Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Energy-efficient hardware with PCI slots?

    Hardware
    5
    8
    861
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      sensemann
      last edited by

      Hello,

      I am looking for an energy-efficient box with 2 or 3 PCI-Slots (for Quad NICs).

      Which components or ready-to-use boxes you can recommend?

      Shoule be just enough for 100Mbit WAN.

      Thanks for your response

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GruensFroeschliG
        GruensFroeschli
        last edited by

        What are you trying to do?
        If you're looking to route only 100Mbit you might probably be well off with a VLAN capable switch and trunking multiple virtual interfaces over a single (or multiple) trunk(s).

        We do what we must, because we can.

        Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          sensemann
          last edited by

          Hi, I dont like VLANs and I need some ports ( at least 5) for using different IPs with the cable provider. 1 mac address = 1 IP.

          So, I am looking for energy-efficient hardware with PCI slots..

          btw, the LAN ports should be able to filter GigE.

          Cheers!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            Guest
            last edited by

            A quotom box with 5 intel cards built in would work…

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              DeLorean
              last edited by

              You can use a Quad PCI-X NIC in a PCI slot, but i works only with 1 lane
              of the speed bus of the NIC.
              So your maximum throughput speed will be arround 220Mbps between the four Gigabit ports.

              Grtz
              DeLorean

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V
                VAMike
                last edited by

                Do you actually mean PCI slots or do you mean PCIe slots? Actual (ancient) multiport PCI cards will burn through any possible energy savings on the CPU side.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  Guest
                  last edited by

                  @VAMike:

                  Do you actually mean PCI slots or do you mean PCIe slots? Actual (ancient) multiport PCI cards will burn through any possible energy savings on the CPU side.

                  He means PCI-X, not PCI or PCIe. But in the PCI-X case, also power burns all.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    VAMike
                    last edited by

                    @johnkeates:

                    @VAMike:

                    Do you actually mean PCI slots or do you mean PCIe slots? Actual (ancient) multiport PCI cards will burn through any possible energy savings on the CPU side.

                    He means PCI-X, not PCI or PCIe. But in the PCI-X case, also power burns all.

                    PCI-X is dead, so he won't find that. My thought was that someone might be trying to reuse an ancient quad port card (even if it were PCI-X that spec was backward compatible with PCI so that might work even if it performed horribly). Or (hopefully) someone is just using the wrong term for a PCIe port.

                    There were, once upon a time, PCI-X to PCIe bridges, but that's firmly in "just don't do that" territory.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.