Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Hardware for small business

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    20 Posts 5 Posters 2.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • O
      oxhey
      last edited by

      @johnkeates:

      If you're gonna get one for business use, get a single vendor source. Check netgate, or if you are not afraid for asian vendors, qotom and minisys.
      Other options are business desktop PC's, small servers and perhaps used pre-existing rack mounted network gear that had some other software on it (but you'd luck out on the hardware support right away).

      I agree that a netgate one would be good for business use and I will present that as an option to management.

      We have 2 internet connections so may end up using both a custom solution and netgate one.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DerelictD
        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
        last edited by

        pfSense can wrangle two internet connections on one node.

        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • O
          oxhey
          last edited by

          @Derelict:

          A tight budget should consider the long-term cost of the power bill (firewalls generally run 24x7) vs the up-front cost of the hardware.

          I will update the list with the G4560T, but by tight budget I meant only for this project.

          You know how it is with management that think of this as an afterthought  :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DerelictD
            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
            last edited by

            I have generally found that management likes when suggestions are made that cost them less money over, say, three to five years.

            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • O
              oxhey
              last edited by

              @Derelict:

              pfSense can wrangle two internet connections on one node.

              Im aware of this  :) , but the connections are on opposite sides of the building (because of course they).

              We have our main Virgin Media connection which I intend to use my build for and we have a backup slow sky broadband connection which we will probably end up using a netgate system with.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • O
                oxhey
                last edited by

                @Derelict:

                I have generally found that management likes when suggestions are made that cost them less money over, say, three to five years.

                Noted! :)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DerelictD
                  Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                  last edited by

                  Nothing some ethernet can't fix.

                  If you have two routers you have to overcome the inevitable asymmetric routing issues.

                  But it sounds like you know exactly what you need to do. I'm out.

                  Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                  A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                  DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                  Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jahonixJ
                    jahonix
                    last edited by

                    @oxhey:

                    but the connections are on opposite sides of the building

                    And that's an excuse for what? Not running a single system with WAN failover/load-balaning or for being lazy and not pulling a cable (copper or fiber)?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • O
                      oxhey
                      last edited by

                      @jahonix:

                      @oxhey:

                      but the connections are on opposite sides of the building

                      And that's an excuse for what? Not running a single system with WAN failover/load-balaning or for being lazy and not pulling a cable (copper or fiber)?

                      Its really no excuse, but Id rather not over complicate this.

                      I dont want to be making holes in walls to pass pass cables through.

                      I think one pfsense box per connection is fine.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • V
                        VAMike
                        last edited by

                        @oxhey:

                        @jahonix:

                        CPU: TDP 54 W
                        That thing burns 54 Watts with only two (physical) cores. Nice heating and not really the top pick in 2018.

                        That doesn't bother me that much as there is a tight budget for this.

                        I guess at some point we could always upgrade to a G4560T which only has a TDP of 35 W.

                        The TDP is irrelevant unless you're building something that's cooling constrained. All the TDP number means is "you need to be able to dissipate this much heat". It does not mean "it uses this much power all the time" even though some people act like it does. At idle both CPUs will draw about the same (close to nothing). The main difference is that you pay more for a T series CPU that's throttled to prevent it from getting too hot. What does this mean? If you need more CPU when you're under load, the non-T can give it to you and the T can't. Don't get the T series, you don't need it.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • O
                          oxhey
                          last edited by

                          @VAMike:

                          @oxhey:

                          @jahonix:

                          CPU: TDP 54 W
                          That thing burns 54 Watts with only two (physical) cores. Nice heating and not really the top pick in 2018.

                          That doesn't bother me that much as there is a tight budget for this.

                          I guess at some point we could always upgrade to a G4560T which only has a TDP of 35 W.

                          The TDP is irrelevant unless you're building something that's cooling constrained. All the TDP number means is "you need to be able to dissipate this much heat". It does not mean "it uses this much power all the time" even though some people act like it does. At idle both CPUs will draw about the same (close to nothing). The main difference is that you pay more for a T series CPU that's throttled to prevent it from getting too hot. What does this mean? If you need more CPU when you're under load, the non-T can give it to you and the T can't. Don't get the T series, you don't need it.

                          I agree  :)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.