Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Unable to PING test pfSense box

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
    13 Posts 4 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      There would normally also be a 'Default allow LAN to any' rule on the LAN which would pass pings from the LAN subnet. If you don't have that for some reason though you will need a firewall rule to allow pings.

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        Balanga
        last edited by

        @stephenw10:

        There would normally also be a 'Default allow LAN to any' rule on the LAN which would pass pings from the LAN subnet. If you don't have that for some reason though you will need a firewall rule to allow pings.

        Steve

        There are three rules, an Ant-Lock Rule and two Default allow to any LAN rules. These are default rules provided, although I have just added SSHD, but that doesn't work.

        I've tried both ping and ssh from two different FreeBSD machines but neither get any response, although I am able to ping and ssh both machines from the pfSense box.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by

          "I'm sure there is a problem with the routing."

          Please draw up your network - you mention another pfsense.  Going to need to understand how you connected everything if you want help.

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            Balanga
            last edited by

            @johnpoz:

            "I'm sure there is a problem with the routing."

            Please draw up your network - you mention another pfsense.  Going to need to understand how you connected everything if you want help.

            pfSense (main) DHCP Server
                eth0 (WAN) –--- Broadband - connected to Internet via ADSL router
                eth1 (LAN)  192.168.1.1

            sys1

            sys2

            sysx

            pfSense-test
                eth0 (LAN)  192.168.1.4
                ue0 (WAN)  ----- Broadband - connected to Internet via 4G USB modem

            Everything is connect via cable - no WiFi.

            pfSense-test can ping all systems on the LAN.
            No system on the LAN can ping pfSense-test

            When pfSense boots ue0 does not exist. I need to run usb_modeswitch first

            Now after rebooting I am unable to access the webConfigurator so am restricted to the operators console.  I'm not aware of what I may have changed.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by

              Why would there be any routing in such a setup?

              So you have dumb switch that inter connects all devices on the common 192.168.1/24 lan?

              I know you said you have default rules on the lan - but lets see a screenshot of them and the interface mask.. Maybe you set it to /32 vs /24.. When you change IPs on an interface in the gui the gui dropdown likes to default to /32 which many users do not notice.

              So some weird stuff could happen with that…

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                Balanga
                last edited by

                @johnpoz:

                Why would there be any routing in such a setup?

                So you have dumb switch that inter connects all devices on the common 192.168.1/24 lan?

                I know you said you have default rules on the lan - but lets see a screenshot of them and the interface mask.. Maybe you set it to /32 vs /24.. When you change IPs on an interface in the gui the gui dropdown likes to default to /32 which many users do not notice.

                So some weird stuff could happen with that…

                There are a couple of switches but everything works as expected apart from this test pfsense box. I can't do a screenshot because I can no longer connect to the webConfigurator after removing my USB modem and rebooting…

                Maybe I'll try a reinstall, although the problem appears to be something fundamental and should be easily fixable...

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  Yeah such a setup with a shared lan would bet up and running out of the box.. You could have 100 pfsenses all on the same shared lan and connect to any of them from that lan network.

                  Did you put a gateway on the lan interface or do something else sine you thought there was some sort of routing required?

                  The only routing you would need is on the clients on which IP to use if you wanted to use the other pfsense.  Or if the pfsense was downstream vs a shared lan. That is going to be a problem with asymmetrical routing if you want to bounce traffic from 1 pfsense to the other to use the wan connection.

                  If your going to want leverage a different wan connection on the 2nd pfsense then you would connect it to the first via a transit network, not your shared lan setup.  To have a client use a specific pfsense then you would have to do routing on the clients.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    @Balanga:

                    …I can no longer connect to the webConfigurator after removing my USB modem and rebooting...

                    Like we've been saying on your other threads, if you assign ue0 as WAN then disconnected it pfSense won't boot fully because one of it's NICs is missing. If you check the console it's probably waiting at the interfaces assign screen.

                    Steve

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B
                      Balanga
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10:

                      @Balanga:

                      …I can no longer connect to the webConfigurator after removing my USB modem and rebooting...

                      Like we've been saying on your other threads, if you assign ue0 as WAN then disconnected it pfSense won't boot fully because one of it's NICs is missing. If you check the console it's probably waiting at the interfaces assign screen.

                      Steve

                      I'm doing some testing with devd on a FreeBSD box to see if I can get the USB modem configured during boot up. In the meanwhile I will be using a USB/Ethernet adapter on the test pfSense box so that ue0 is available on boot.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Hmm, never tried it but I'm wondering of one of the usb device quirks could work directly here.
                        https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=usb_quirk&sektion=4&n=1

                        It looks like you're using the standard Huawei mode switch message currently so one of those might.

                        If that does work you can just add it in loader.conf.local.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.