Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Updating on top of Netgate/ADI install images

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
    3 Posts 2 Posters 540 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      ament
      last edited by

      I'm troubleshooting a Netgate SG-4860. Current/remaining symptom is that package and updates do not work at all, I suspect some sort of corruption or bad shutdown with /var configured in RAM. Possibly something like https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/6906. I've followed the advice here to no avail: https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Fixing_a_Broken_pkg_Database.

      Anyway, my question is this: If I'm starting with Netgate/ADI-specific images, such as

      pfSense-netgate-memstick-ADI-2.4.3-RELEASE-amd64.img.gz

      do future updates use a Netgate/ADI-specific repo? Does the choice of update mechanism matter, web UI, pfSense-upgrade, pkg, console update menu,  or any other update mechanism?

      Is there a possibility of starting with Netgate/ADI-specific packages and updating in a way that conflicts, e.g., installing Community Edition files?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Yes they do use a specific repo.

        All update mechanisms should give the same result. However if you've had any issues updating you can get more debug info by updating from the command line.

        If you're using a factory install image you have to try hard to switch to the CE repo. It's very unlikely to happen by accident. You will not see any conflicts there.

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          ament
          last edited by

          Thanks, that's what I assumed but nice to have confirmation.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.