Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    OPT interface exit route nightmare

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    13 Posts 4 Posters 1.3k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V Offline
      viragomann
      last edited by

      Yes.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ Online
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by

        Is that wan2 nat being applied? Do a simple sniff on your wan2 - when you send traffic to say your wan2 gateway from this guest client which you say works is pfsense natting this to its wan2 IP?

        Can pfsense using wan2 get to the itnternet?

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 25.07 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DerelictD Offline
          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
          last edited by

          Post your GUEST rules.

          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            mike315
            last edited by

            Thx @viragomann, now that I've added the NAT rule, it's working !
            I still don't know why this NAT rule is needed though... Isn't the interface supposed to forward the traffic to the default gateway / or rule specific gw ?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ Online
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by

              If it doesn't NAT it how does the upstream know how to get back to this downstream network. You wuldn't have to nat it if your upstream knew how to get back to this network.

              If your wan2 is public - then yeah for sure it has to be natted, since rfc1918 doesn't route on the internet.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 25.07 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V Offline
                viragomann
                last edited by

                @mike315 said in OPT interface exit route nightmare:

                I still don’t know why this NAT rule is needed though… Isn’t the interface supposed to forward the traffic to the default gateway / or rule specific gw ?

                You have to distinguish routing and NAT.
                If your internet router have no static route to your guest network behind pfSense, you have to do NAT on outbound traffic.
                If the outbound NAT work in automatic mode, the necessary rules should be added by pfSense automatically, but sometimes that fails.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  mike315
                  last edited by

                  @viragomann

                  But my internet router has a static route to my guest network, with pfsense as a GW...

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DerelictD Offline
                    Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                    last edited by

                    What?

                    Draw a diagram. Please be specific and complete.

                    Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                    A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                    DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                    Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • V Offline
                      viragomann
                      last edited by

                      If it has a route for the guest network pointing to pfSense NAT shoudn‘t be needed. Maybe therer is something wrong with it.
                      Since you have 2 WANs, does the route point to the right address?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M Offline
                        mike315
                        last edited by

                        Ok, it's working now that I've disabled the NAT rule, not sure what was wrong before...

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.