Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Vlan issue

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved L2/Switching/VLANs
    17 Posts 4 Posters 1.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • X
      xciter327
      last edited by

      If You are connecting your test PC directly to the pfsense, You need to tag the traffic on the test PC, with a vlan-10 tag. If You have a switch in-between, you need to make sure your port(facing the test PC) is member of VLAN 10 and it's configured as "un-tagged", which means that all packets coming in/out will be always part of vlan 10.

      That's about it.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        Disthene
        last edited by

        em3 ( on my pf sense) -> plugged to port 1 of the switch in trunk mode.
        port 2 of the switch is plugged on the computer in access mode vlan 10.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DerelictD
          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
          last edited by

          Then it would be working.

          Be sure VLAN 10 is tagged on the switch port connected to pfSense em3.

          Be sure the switchport connected to the PC is untagged on VLAN 10.

          It's pretty much that simple.

          Note the firewall rule in the image you posted has 0B received. That indicates it is receiving no traffic.

          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • F
            frikinet
            last edited by

            I also think something could be wrong with the trunk link between your pfSense box and your switch. Try to make packet captures from pfSense (or even from the switch) to see if the traffic is reaching the firewall and if it's correctly tagged.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              Disthene
              last edited by Disthene

              0_1531134152117_Screenshot_41.png

              0_1531134159402_Screenshot_42.png

              This is my switch config, very basic, it should work with this ...I don't see the problem...

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DerelictD
                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                last edited by Derelict

                Neither do I.

                But if it was that simple it would be working. You are missing something.

                Post the output of Diagnostics > Command Prompt Execute ifconfig -a

                Are you 100% positive that with that switch port config it will pass all vlans?

                switchport trunk allowed vlan add 10 or something?

                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DerelictD
                  Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                  last edited by

                  Why are you running 2.3.5 if you are amd64?

                  All of this works in both but why?

                  Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                  A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                  DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                  Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    Disthene
                    last edited by Disthene

                    Here the command you asked
                    Also I'm on this version because I'm doing shit on GNS3...preparing the job is better, especially with such kind of issue...

                    em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
	ether 00:0c:29:ca:5f:e3
	hwaddr 00:0c:29:ca:5f:e3
	inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feca:5fe3%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
	inet 192.168.0.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
em1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
	ether 00:0c:29:ca:5f:ed
	hwaddr 00:0c:29:ca:5f:ed
	inet6 fe80::1:1%em1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
	inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
em2: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
	ether 00:0c:29:ca:5f:f7
	hwaddr 00:0c:29:ca:5f:f7
	inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feca:5ff7%em2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
	inet 192.168.19.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.19.255
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
em3: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
	ether 00:0c:29:ca:5f:01
	hwaddr 00:0c:29:ca:5f:01
	inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feca:5f01%em3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
	inet 192.168.50.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.50.255
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
pflog0: flags=100<PROMISC> metric 0 mtu 33160
pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1500
	syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 defer: on
	syncok: 1
enc0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1536
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
	options=600003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
	inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
	inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
	inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
em3_vlan10: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM>
	ether 00:0c:29:ca:5f:01
	inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feca:5f01%em3_vlan10 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9
	inet 192.168.10.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.10.255
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
	vlan: 10 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: em3

                    I enabled em3 only for testing, I know I shouldn't use a logical interface here

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DerelictD
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by

                      Yeah that is all kinds of hosed up.

                      You have two interfaces (em0 and em1) with 192.168.0.254 assigned. You have two entries for em1. em3 looks reasonable but idk wtf you have going on there.

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        Disthene
                        last edited by

                        It was a mistake in my copy/paste, just refresh please

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DerelictD
                          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                          last edited by

                          Really?

                          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            Disthene
                            last edited by Disthene

                            I don't know what the fuck happened, let me try the command again...
                            now up to date :

                            em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
	ether 00:0c:29:ca:5f:e3
	hwaddr 00:0c:29:ca:5f:e3
	inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feca:5fe3%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
	inet 192.168.0.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
em1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
	ether 00:0c:29:ca:5f:ed
	hwaddr 00:0c:29:ca:5f:ed
	inet6 fe80::1:1%em1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
	inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
em2: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
	ether 00:0c:29:ca:5f:f7
	hwaddr 00:0c:29:ca:5f:f7
	inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feca:5ff7%em2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
	inet 192.168.19.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.19.255
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
em3: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
	ether 00:0c:29:ca:5f:01
	hwaddr 00:0c:29:ca:5f:01
	inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feca:5f01%em3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
	inet 192.168.50.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.50.255
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
pflog0: flags=100<PROMISC> metric 0 mtu 33160
pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1500
	syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 defer: on
	syncok: 1
enc0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1536
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
	options=600003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
	inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
	inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
	inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
em3_vlan10: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM>
	ether 00:0c:29:ca:5f:01
	inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:feca:5f01%em3_vlan10 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9
	inet 192.168.10.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.10.255
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
	status: active
	vlan: 10 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: em3
                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DerelictD
                              Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                              last edited by Derelict

                              OK so any interface assigned to VLAN 10 on em3 will be tagged there.

                              If that is not working it is your switch. Or, in your case, maybe GNS3.

                              Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                              A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                              DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                              Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                Disthene
                                last edited by

                                If by chance I find the answer...I'll post it there, but I'll quite this shit soon I think...

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • D
                                  Disthene
                                  last edited by

                                  I confirm that it's not pfsense, but my cisco config, I need to make some research as I'm not a cisco expert but clearly pfsense is working correctly, thanks for your time guys ! :)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.