Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New SG-3100 with gigabit comcast line... can't get over 540Mbps

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Official Netgate® Hardware
    17 Posts 7 Posters 7.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      How exactly are you connecting the SG-3100?

      Is it pulling a public IP via DHCP?

      I would certainly expect it to get close to line rate there in straight firewall/NAT throughput.

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DerelictD
        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
        last edited by

        How is your WAN provisioned? DHCP? PPPoE? Static?

        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          teksavy
          last edited by

          I'm pulling the WAN IP via DHCP.

          The server doesn't matter. After 10+ tests with different servers, the results are all pretty much the same.

          Like I said before, straight out of the box default configuration yields the same results.

          Any ideas are appreciated.

          Thank you,

          Ed

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by johnpoz

            From your public IPs you listed there in your 2 tests - your clearly on a different ISP segment when your slower vs the segment your on when your faster.

            So it is possible its your isp. I would suggest for a valid test take your isp out of the equation. Why don't you put box on the wan side running iperf, and a box on the lan side and do some testing that way, etc.

            have a 3100 here, but its in production - and would get screamed at for taking it down for a test ;) Sorry but our connection here is not gig, so I can not just do a speed test to show getting gig, etc.

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              teksavy
              last edited by

              I figured out what the problem was... and it had nothing to do with the Netgate SG-3100!

              Speedtest through the SG-3100 now....
              alt text

              The issue was that another gigabit 8-port switch was in between my main machine and my core HP ProCurve switch. It simply could not handle the sustained throughput.

              Once I connected my main machine directly to the core switch... viola... issue gone.

              Shame on me for not testing better (and being consistent with my test machines) before posting. I should have done better apples to apples testing. I'm sorry to bother the group with a bad post.

              Hopefully others will see this and know that those little 8 port gigabit switches can't really handle gigabit sustained traffic and they should really test everything before posting.

              Mea culpa,

              Ed

              PS: Does anyone have a favorite Bootable USB linux distro that has some nice network testing tools built in like iperf? I'd like to add it to my toolbox.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Nice catch. I would not have expected that. Even from the lowest of low end switches!

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DerelictD
                  Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                  last edited by

                  Please name names. ☺ What switch was that?

                  Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                  A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                  DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                  Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                  T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    teksavy @Derelict
                    last edited by

                    @derelict said in New SG-3100 with gigabit comcast line... can't get over 540Mbps:

                    Please name names. ☺ What switch was that?

                    So.. I tried two...

                    The worst one (in the original post) in terms of speed was the Trendnet "GreenNet" switch model TEG-S81g (HW v2.0R) with 514 Mbps.

                    I then tried a non-green 8 port switch from Netgear- one of those "business grade" units with a metal box and probably lead weight inside. Model GS108-400NAS. It yielded slightly better- around 580Mbps.

                    Hope this helps.

                    -Ed

                    G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • DerelictD
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by

                      Thanks. Trendnet and Netgear are some of my all-time favorites. 🙄

                      Was kind of hoping you'd say TP-Link though. :)

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T
                        teksavy @Derelict
                        last edited by

                        @derelict said in New SG-3100 with gigabit comcast line... can't get over 540Mbps:

                        Thanks. Trendnet and Netgear are some of my all-time favorites. 🙄

                        Was kind of hoping you'd say TP-Link though. :)

                        TBH, I was surprised too! I've had really good luck with Netgear and TPLink switches.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • G
                          gfeiner @teksavy
                          last edited by

                          @teksavy said in New SG-3100 with gigabit comcast line... can't get over 540Mbps:

                          @derelict said in New SG-3100 with gigabit comcast line... can't get over 540Mbps:

                          Please name names. ☺ What switch was that?

                          So.. I tried two...

                          The worst one (in the original post) in terms of speed was the Trendnet "GreenNet" switch model TEG-S81g (HW v2.0R) with 514 Mbps.

                          I then tried a non-green 8 port switch from Netgear- one of those "business grade" units with a metal box and probably lead weight inside. Model GS108-400NAS. It yielded slightly better- around 580Mbps.

                          Hope this helps.

                          -Ed

                          Thanks for the info. I have a TEG-S80g. I'll need to keep this in mind if I ever get gig internet.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B
                            behemyth
                            last edited by

                            My 3100 has been rock solid running Comcast Gig. Make sure you test with [speedtest.xfinity.com], it will use a dedicated server that is always able to do gig, when you just use speedtest you use other peoples servers, and most of the time they dont have gig bandwidth.

                            I did have weird issues with my modem firmware causing slower speeds, but they appear to have fixed that. What modem model are you running btw?

                            T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • T
                              teksavy @behemyth
                              last edited by

                              I'm running a Motorola MB8600 (32 channels down and 8 channels up). Total speed demon and very reliable. Only thing I wish it had was more than one port. (It actually has 4 ports, but three are masked off- for use with bonded connections only).

                              @behemyth said in New SG-3100 with gigabit comcast line... can't get over 540Mbps:

                              My 3100 has been rock solid running Comcast Gig. Make sure you test with [speedtest.xfinity.com], it will use a dedicated server that is always able to do gig, when you just use speedtest you use other peoples servers, and most of the time they dont have gig bandwidth.

                              I did have weird issues with my modem firmware causing slower speeds, but they appear to have fixed that. What modem model are you running btw?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B
                                border
                                last edited by border

                                This post is deleted!
                                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • B
                                  border @border
                                  last edited by

                                  This post is deleted!
                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.