Will my extra hardware work well for pfSense?
-
Yes.
That should work great I would expect. You almost certainly won't need 16GB RAM but it doesn't hurt.
You won't be able to use a 2TB HD, pfSense required only minimal install space. I have test boxes running in 2GB. It does try to create a SWAP partition double the RAM size by default. IT will run happily on a 32GB SSD for example.What sort of bandwidth do you need to pass? VPNs?
Steve
-
My internet provides 100Mb download and 10Mb Up, I do plan on setting up VPN's and using snort and pfBlocker. I believe when using Plex I've seen it use as much as 25MB of bandwidth and theres also some torrenting bandwidth.
I wasn't sure about using a SSD or usb stick because i saw post about lots of writes burning out flash drives quickly. It actually seems hard to get a small hard drive now. I would prefer to not use the 2TB hard drive but it was literally just laying on my desk, but i'd like to use something that would not be a huge waste and will last. -
At 100Mbps you will have no issues at all with that system. You should have no real problems up to 1Gbps though it won't fill 1G with VPN traffic. It will at 100M easily.
You can use a 2TB drive no problem it will just be 99% unused.
There is a lot of FUD regarding SSDs and write life. Yes they have limited write-life but any decent drive it will last many many years. They are worlds apart from running on, for example, a CF card where you do have to consider write-life and take steps to minimise writes. You won't have an issue running from an SSD. At least not a write-life related one!
Steve
-
Just by way of another data point, I've been running a Zotac CI323 Nano (Intel Celeron N3150, comparison here) with 4GB of RAM and a 32GB SSD. I also have a 100/10 connection, run Snort and pfBlockerNG, and maintain 3 concurrent VPN client connections. I haven't run into any resource constraints or throughput issues.
-
@thenarc thanks for the info, I thought it would be fine. I just wanted to get the opinion of people who have more experience with pfSense than my self.
-
The basic pfsense takes very little resources, until people start to load up packages "because they are there."
My playbox was a circa 2000 single-core Pentium-III and was idling @ 30% cpu load.
-
Ha, I think you got me beat there. Pretty sure my first test box was a Pentium-4.
Steve
-
Is one of these NIC's preferred over the other?
Intel PRO/1000 PT QUAD
or
Intel PRO/1000 VT QUAD -
@techsanity VT has more hardware channels; useful for virtualization, doesn't matter for pfsense. get the cheaper one.
-
Make me an offer on your old hardware, because I need to build a NAS box. :)
Then use the money to buy a Netgate device. :)
