Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Problema com VPN IPSEC conecta apenas em uma maquina

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Portuguese
    6 Posts 2 Posters 780 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • W
      willfranco
      last edited by willfranco

      Boa Tarde Pessoal, estou com um problema que nao consigo entende o que pode estar errado, tenho configurado VPN IPsec para conexoes externas de funcionarios geralmente no MacBook, tenho os usuarios cadastrados no L2TP para acessos, tudo funcionava normalmente porem agora apenas uma maquina especifica conesegeu conectar as outras nao

      Alguem sabe o que poderia ser
      https://imgur.com/a/isnlXut
      vpn

      W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W
        willfranco @willfranco
        last edited by

        @willfranco alguem conseguiria me ajudar?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • W
          willfranco
          last edited by

          Percebi que refazendo toda a configuração a primeira maquina que conecta na vpn fica sempre funcionando todas as demais não conecta, Exemplo maquina A é a primeira conectar depois da configuração dos túneis vai de boa a Maquina B e C nao conecta, se eu desfazer os túneis e a primeira maquina a se conectar for a B ela vai de boa e as outras não

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • W
            willfranco
            last edited by marcelloc

            log da maquina que nao conecta, alguém me da uma luz!!!!

            Aug 10 17:40:51	charon		11[IKE] <13> IKE_SA (unnamed)[13] state change: CONNECTING => DESTROYING
            Aug 10 17:40:51	charon		11[JOB] <13> deleting half open IKE_SA with 177.58.239.34 after timeout
            Aug 10 17:40:44	charon		11[IKE] <13> ID_PROT request with message ID 0 processing failed
            Aug 10 17:40:44	charon		11[NET] <13> sending packet: from 177.68.148.144[500] to 177.58.239.34[29556] (76 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:44	charon		11[ENC] <13> generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 3798514334 [ HASH N(PLD_MAL) ]
            Aug 10 17:40:44	charon		11[IKE] <13> message parsing failed
            Aug 10 17:40:44	charon		11[ENC] <13> could not decrypt payloads
            Aug 10 17:40:44	charon		11[ENC] <13> invalid ID_V1 payload length, decryption failed?
            Aug 10 17:40:44	charon		11[NET] <13> received packet: from 177.58.239.34[29524] to 177.68.148.144[4500] (108 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:31	charon		11[IKE] <13> ID_PROT request with message ID 0 processing failed
            Aug 10 17:40:31	charon		11[NET] <13> sending packet: from 177.68.148.144[500] to 177.58.239.34[29556] (76 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:31	charon		11[ENC] <13> generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 2917947375 [ HASH N(PLD_MAL) ]
            Aug 10 17:40:31	charon		11[IKE] <13> message parsing failed
            Aug 10 17:40:31	charon		11[ENC] <13> could not decrypt payloads
            Aug 10 17:40:31	charon		11[ENC] <13> invalid ID_V1 payload length, decryption failed?
            Aug 10 17:40:31	charon		11[NET] <13> received packet: from 177.58.239.34[29524] to 177.68.148.144[4500] (108 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:28	charon		11[IKE] <13> ID_PROT request with message ID 0 processing failed
            Aug 10 17:40:28	charon		11[NET] <13> sending packet: from 177.68.148.144[500] to 177.58.239.34[29556] (76 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:28	charon		11[ENC] <13> generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 3688728202 [ HASH N(PLD_MAL) ]
            Aug 10 17:40:28	charon		11[IKE] <13> message parsing failed
            Aug 10 17:40:28	charon		11[ENC] <13> could not decrypt payloads
            Aug 10 17:40:28	charon		11[ENC] <13> invalid ID_V1 payload length, decryption failed?
            Aug 10 17:40:28	charon		11[NET] <13> received packet: from 177.58.239.34[29524] to 177.68.148.144[4500] (108 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:25	charon		11[IKE] <13> ID_PROT request with message ID 0 processing failed
            Aug 10 17:40:25	charon		11[NET] <13> sending packet: from 177.68.148.144[500] to 177.58.239.34[29556] (76 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:25	charon		11[ENC] <13> generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 1505104153 [ HASH N(PLD_MAL) ]
            Aug 10 17:40:25	charon		11[IKE] <13> message parsing failed
            Aug 10 17:40:25	charon		11[ENC] <13> could not decrypt payloads
            Aug 10 17:40:25	charon		11[ENC] <13> invalid ID_V1 payload length, decryption failed?
            Aug 10 17:40:25	charon		11[NET] <13> received packet: from 177.58.239.34[29524] to 177.68.148.144[4500] (108 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:22	charon		11[IKE] <13> ID_PROT request with message ID 0 processing failed
            Aug 10 17:40:22	charon		11[NET] <13> sending packet: from 177.68.148.144[500] to 177.58.239.34[29556] (76 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:22	charon		11[ENC] <13> generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 540116142 [ HASH N(PLD_MAL) ]
            Aug 10 17:40:22	charon		11[IKE] <13> message parsing failed
            Aug 10 17:40:22	charon		11[ENC] <13> could not decrypt payloads
            Aug 10 17:40:22	charon		11[ENC] <13> invalid ID_V1 payload length, decryption failed?
            Aug 10 17:40:22	charon		11[NET] <13> received packet: from 177.58.239.34[29524] to 177.68.148.144[4500] (108 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[NET] <13> sending packet: from 177.68.148.144[500] to 177.58.239.34[29556] (244 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[ENC] <13> generating ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> candidate "con1", match: 1/1/28 (me/other/ike)
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> candidate "bypasslan", match: 1/1/24 (me/other/ike)
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> remote host is behind NAT
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[ENC] <13> parsed ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[NET] <13> received packet: from 177.58.239.34[29556] to 177.68.148.144[500] (228 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[NET] <13> sending packet: from 177.68.148.144[500] to 177.58.239.34[29556] (160 bytes)
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[ENC] <13> generating ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V V V ]
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> sending NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> sending FRAGMENTATION vendor ID
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> sending DPD vendor ID
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> sending XAuth vendor ID
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> received proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_2048, IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_2048, IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_MD5_96/PRF_HMAC_MD5/MODP_2048, IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_512_256/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_512/MODP_2048, IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_1536, IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1536, IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_MD5_96/PRF_HMAC_MD5/MODP_1536, IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_1024, IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_MD5_96/PRF_HMAC_MD5/MODP_1024, IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_MD5_96/PRF_HMAC_MD5/MODP_1024, IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_MD5_96/PRF_HMAC_MD5/MODP_1024
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> proposal matches
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> selecting proposal:
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> no acceptable PSEUDO_RANDOM_FUNCTION found
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> selecting proposal:
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> no acceptable PSEUDO_RANDOM_FUNCTION found
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> selecting proposal:
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> no acceptable DIFFIE_HELLMAN_GROUP found
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> selecting proposal:
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> no acceptable PSEUDO_RANDOM_FUNCTION found
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> selecting proposal:
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> no acceptable PSEUDO_RANDOM_FUNCTION found
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> selecting proposal:
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> no acceptable PSEUDO_RANDOM_FUNCTION found
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> selecting proposal:
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> no acceptable DIFFIE_HELLMAN_GROUP found
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> selecting proposal:
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> no acceptable PSEUDO_RANDOM_FUNCTION found
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[CFG] <13> selecting proposal:
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> IKE_SA (unnamed)[13] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> 177.58.239.34 is initiating a Main Mode IKE_SA
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> received DPD vendor ID
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> received FRAGMENTATION vendor ID
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> received draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02\n vendor ID
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> received draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02 vendor ID
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> received draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03 vendor ID
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> received draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-04 vendor ID
            Aug 10 17:40:21	charon		11[IKE] <13> received draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-05 vendor ID
            
            W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • W
              willfranco @willfranco
              last edited by

              @willfranco
              Boa Tarde @marcelloc consegue me auxiliar nesse quesito?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • marcellocM
                marcelloc
                last edited by

                A mensagem está cheia de erros de IPSEC.
                Confere as chaves e identificadores definidos em cada um dos lados.

                Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                Help a community developer! ;D

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.