Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PC Engines APU2C4 Download bandwidth half of upload

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    11 Posts 4 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V
      VAMike
      last edited by

      Someone had a suggestion in https://forum.netgate.com/topic/96129/gigabit-pppoe-and-intel-drivers/12 but nobody seems to have tried it yet.

      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Yes, if you're hitting that it would be good to try that sysctl.

        Unfortunately I can only dream of a WAN connection that fast. 😉

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • superweaselS
          superweasel
          last edited by

          Sounds average for a high speed PPPoE connection and the current release of pfSense.

          I have been waiting 4 years for this to get fixed https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4821 with no resolution in sight.

          pfSense rig: pfSense SG-4860/120GB SSD
          WAN: CenturyLink Gigabit Fiber

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T
            themaninspain @VAMike
            last edited by

            @vamike

            Just tried it, download has improved to 450 mbits/s. I'll do some more testing over the next 24 hours. Speed tests are notoriously fickle and I'd like to get some average numbers

            V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • V
              VAMike @themaninspain
              last edited by

              @themaninspain for grins, you might try to compare with a linux based distro, like openwrt

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Mmm, that's quite a significant improvement. More than I expected TBH.

                Steve

                V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • V
                  VAMike @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 It's about what I expected; the freebsd defaults are trying to do too much in the interrupt context for these low-power devices. If he runs both tests with firewalling disabled, I'd expect a dramatic improvement in the non-deferred case and hopefully much less so in the deferred case (but that's hard to test in a NAT environment). Also, @themaninspain what are your net.isr.maxthreads and net.isr.numthreads set to?

                  T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    themaninspain @VAMike
                    last edited by

                    @vamike

                    Both are set to 4

                    V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • V
                      VAMike @themaninspain
                      last edited by

                      @themaninspain cool, that should be optimal

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T
                        themaninspain
                        last edited by themaninspain

                        Bandwidth measurements are consistent. Max download is averaging out to 450.
                        I know I won't get the full 600/600 but I don't really need it.

                        Thanks for all of the help.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.