Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Firewall blocks, Pfblocker, multicast

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    13 Posts 4 Posters 2.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • NogBadTheBadN
      NogBadTheBad
      last edited by NogBadTheBad

      Do I need to have this traffic blocked?

      If you don't want it being gogged you do.

      Is it being blocked from going around my LAN, or only being blocked from going out the WAN? Do I want it being blocked from going out the WAN?

      Its local to the subnet.

      Assuming I need this traffic to go around my LAN for device/service functionality, how can I keep the functionality but prevent the logs being full of this.

      Create a firewall above the Pfblocker rule blocking multicast and set it not to log if you don't need multicast past your LAN interface.

      https://www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-addresses/multicast-addresses.xhtml

      Andy

      1 x Netgate SG-4860 - 3 x Linksys LGS308P - 1 x Aruba InstantOn AP22

      occamsrazorO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • occamsrazorO
        occamsrazor @NogBadTheBad
        last edited by

        @nogbadthebad said in Firewall blocks, Pfblocker, multicast:

        Create a firewall above the Pfblocker rule blocking multicast and set it not to log if you don't need multicast past your LAN interface.

        Thanks. But still a little confused. So is the multicast traffic currently being blocked only multicast traffic that's trying to exit the WAN? Therefore I would want to block that but not log it.... is that correct?
        pfBlocker rules live in the Floating firewall tab, is that where I would put your rule? Or on the WAN tab?

        I should add I do also have OpenVPN TAP & TUN servers for remote access running on pfSense and think I would want multicast traffic to be allowed to those clients.

        pfSense CE on Qotom Q355G4 8GB RAM/60GB SSD
        Ubiquiti Unifi wired and wireless network, APC UPSs
        Mac OSX and IOS devices, QNAP NAS

        NogBadTheBadN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • NogBadTheBadN
          NogBadTheBad @occamsrazor
          last edited by

          @occamsrazor

          Sorry was mid edit and the phone went :)

          Andy

          1 x Netgate SG-4860 - 3 x Linksys LGS308P - 1 x Aruba InstantOn AP22

          JKnottJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JKnottJ
            JKnott
            last edited by

            @occamsrazor said in Firewall blocks, Pfblocker, multicast:

            Thanks. But still a little confused. So is the multicast traffic currently being blocked only multicast traffic that's trying to exit the WAN?

            Mulitcast has to specifically be configured for it to get through a router. This can be either manually or automatically, with multicast snooping/discovery. If you don't have either of those then those multicasts are notleaving your LAN.

            PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
            i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
            UniFi AC-Lite access point

            I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

            occamsrazorO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • JKnottJ
              JKnott @NogBadTheBad
              last edited by

              @nogbadthebad said in Firewall blocks, Pfblocker, multicast:

              Sorry was mid edit and the phone went :)

              That's OK, we didn't mind waiting. 😉

              PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
              i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
              UniFi AC-Lite access point

              I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • BBcan177B
                BBcan177 Moderator
                last edited by

                Better to view blocked events in the Alerts tab.

                Do you use Firehol level 1 feed? That feed contains bogons and should not be used for outbound blocking.

                "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • occamsrazorO
                  occamsrazor @JKnott
                  last edited by occamsrazor

                  @jknott said in Firewall blocks, Pfblocker, multicast:

                  Mulitcast has to specifically be configured for it to get through a router. This can be either manually or automatically, with multicast snooping/discovery. If you don't have either of those then those multicasts are notleaving your LAN.

                  So basically there is no need for lists in pfBlocker to be blocking it anyway? There's no need for me to be blocking it for security purposes, and it's not being blocked from reaching my LAN devices... its merely a logging issue.

                  @bbcan177 said in Firewall blocks, Pfblocker, multicast:

                  Better to view blocked events in the Alerts tab.

                  Indeed, thanks. I've identified one list that was problematic, have now deleted that. But some of the blocks are showing "no match" as to where the block is coming from...

                  0_1535725447107_alerts.jpg

                  Do you use Firehol level 1 feed? That feed contains bogons and should not be used for outbound blocking.

                  No... I made that mistake once already :-) Never again...

                  I guess all this will be easier once I move over to the new version of your excellent blocker, but for now I think I have to wait until 2.4.4 stable is released as that's required for pfBlockerNG-devel right? Or can it safely be run on 2.4.3-RELEASE-p1?

                  pfSense CE on Qotom Q355G4 8GB RAM/60GB SSD
                  Ubiquiti Unifi wired and wireless network, APC UPSs
                  Mac OSX and IOS devices, QNAP NAS

                  BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JKnottJ
                    JKnott
                    last edited by

                    @occamsrazor said in Firewall blocks, Pfblocker, multicast:

                    So basically there is no need for lists in pfBlocker to be blocking it anyway? There's no need for me to be blocking it for security purposes, and it's not being blocked from reaching my LAN devices... its merely a logging issue.

                    Correct. However, if you want to be sure, run Wireshark or Packet Capture on the WAN port. I doubt you'll see those multicasts.

                    PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                    i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                    UniFi AC-Lite access point

                    I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • BBcan177B
                      BBcan177 Moderator @occamsrazor
                      last edited by BBcan177

                      @occamsrazor said in Firewall blocks, Pfblocker, multicast:

                      No... I made that mistake once already :-) Never again...
                      I guess all this will be easier once I move over to the new version of your excellent blocker, but for now I think I have to wait until 2.4.4 stable is released as that's required for pfBlockerNG-devel right? Or can it safely be run on 2.4.3-RELEASE-p1?

                      If you stay on 2.4.3, then you can goto pfBlockerNG-devel.

                      The issue people were having was when they were on 2.4.3, and the switched to the 2.4.4 devel branch and then went to pfBlockerNG-devel. This causes the PHPv7 to be installed in 2.4.3 which caused issues...

                      So for those who want to goto 2.4.4, they need to update pfSense first before installing pfBlockerNG-devel.

                      There is one of your feeds that contains a block on 224/3 which is not a good idea. The new devel has a Feeds management page with a list of Feeds from the original sources which should be better.

                      "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                      Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                      Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                      Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                      occamsrazorO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • occamsrazorO
                        occamsrazor @BBcan177
                        last edited by

                        @bbcan177 said in Firewall blocks, Pfblocker, multicast:

                        If you stay on 2.4.3, then you can goto pfBlockerNG-devel.

                        The issue people were having was when they were on 2.4.3, and the switched to the 2.4.4 devel branch and then went to pfBlockerNG-devel. This causes the PHPv7 to be installed in 2.4.3 which caused issues...

                        So for those who want to goto 2.4.4, they need to update pfSense first before installing pfBlockerNG-devel.

                        Thanks, I was kind of following that issue but then lost track. So on 2.4.3-RELEASE-p1 I can just disable pfblockerNG in its settings (but keep it around in case of any issues) and install pfBlockerNG-devel? Or does pfblockerNG need to be uninstalled as a package first before installing the pfBlockerNG-devel package?

                        pfSense CE on Qotom Q355G4 8GB RAM/60GB SSD
                        Ubiquiti Unifi wired and wireless network, APC UPSs
                        Mac OSX and IOS devices, QNAP NAS

                        BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • BBcan177B
                          BBcan177 Moderator @occamsrazor
                          last edited by BBcan177

                          @occamsrazor said in Firewall blocks, Pfblocker, multicast:

                          Thanks, I was kind of following that issue but then lost track. So on 2.4.3-RELEASE-p1 I can just disable pfblockerNG in its settings (but keep it around in case of any issues) and install pfBlockerNG-devel? Or does pfblockerNG need to be uninstalled as a package first before installing the pfBlockerNG-devel package?

                          First make sure that "Keep Settings" is enabled.
                          Disable pfBlockerNG and Save
                          Then Uninstall pfBlockerNG
                          Then install pfBlockerNG-devel
                          Re-enable pfBlockerNG-devel and run a: Force Reload - All

                          "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                          Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                          Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                          Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                          occamsrazorO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • occamsrazorO
                            occamsrazor @BBcan177
                            last edited by occamsrazor

                            @bbcan177 said in Firewall blocks, Pfblocker, multicast:

                            First make sure that "Keep Settings" is enabled.
                            Disable pfBlockerNG and Save
                            Then Uninstall pfBlockerNG
                            Then install pfBlockerNG-devel
                            Re-enable pfBlockerNG-devel and run a: Force Reload - All

                            Awesome, thanks a lot, will give it a try.....

                            pfSense CE on Qotom Q355G4 8GB RAM/60GB SSD
                            Ubiquiti Unifi wired and wireless network, APC UPSs
                            Mac OSX and IOS devices, QNAP NAS

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.