Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfSense 2.4.1 - ikev2 IPSEC tunnel under load crashes whole firewall VM

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPsec
    30 Posts 10 Posters 6.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      lkolbe @jimp
      last edited by

      @jimp we're experiencing the same problem. One client, using AES256-gcm, reliably crashes the SG-8860 w/pfsense 2.4.3 when using e.g. speedtest.net (during the upload phase), another can't bring it down at all. Switching back to plain AES with SHA512 seems to fix it for now. All clients are Macbook Pros.
      Kind regards,
      Lukas

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        dave.opc
        last edited by

        is AES256-GCM better than AES?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DerelictD
          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
          last edited by

          AES-GCM is an authenticated cipher so you can eliminate the hashing step. If max IPsec performance is what you seek, AES-GCM is the way to go.

          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            dave.opc
            last edited by

            I got 2 sites connected via IPSEC using AES. Both have 100Mb connection to internet. And IPSEC uses the whole 100Mb bandwidth on file transfers. So what is the limitation for AES, compared to AES-GCM?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DerelictD
              Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
              last edited by

              AES-GCM will consume fewer CPU cycles to accomplish the same task.

              Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
              A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
              DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
              Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dave.opc
                last edited by

                So basically, if you got powerful enough CPU/PC it dosn't matter which algorithm to use?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DerelictD
                  Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                  last edited by

                  AES-GCM will use fewer CPU cycles to accomplish the same task.

                  Fewer cycles means more cycles available for other tasks.

                  You can waste them if you so desire.

                  Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                  A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                  DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                  Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • L
                    lkolbe
                    last edited by

                    ... as long as you can live with the occasional hard crash (at least on an SG-8860/Atom C7258 using AES-NI). I haven't yet found out what kind of traffic pattern causes this crash; switching to AES-CBC w/SHA512 removed the crashes reliably for us.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • msrachelchenM
                      msrachelchen @jimp
                      last edited by

                      @jimp said in PfSense 2.4.1 - ikev2 IPSEC tunnel under load crashes whole firewall VM:

                      To claim it's unusable in general is untrue. The crash must be specific to a certain combination of hardware, traffic load, and/or pattern of traffic.

                      Loads of people are using AES-NI and AES-GCM without crashing, including just about every Netgate employee from our home firewalls.

                      If that's the case, what are their hardware configurations? It seems to me that this issue is pretty common among users, and there isn't a pattern in hardware I can see.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • msrachelchenM
                        msrachelchen
                        last edited by

                        Same issue with AES-GCM+AES-NI crashing the system:

                        Version	2.4.3-RELEASE-p1 (amd64) 
                        built on Thu May 10 15:02:52 CDT 2018 
                        FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p10 
                        	 
                        CPU Type	Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1271 v3 @ 3.60GHz
                        Current: 3600 MHz, Max: 3601 MHz
                        4 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s)
                        AES-NI CPU Crypto: Yes (active)
                        
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DerelictD
                          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                          last edited by Derelict

                          All kinds, but mostly Netgate devices such as the SG-2440, SG-4860, SG-3100.

                          Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU C2558 @ 2.40GHz
                          4 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s)
                          AES-NI CPU Crypto: Yes (active)

                          Uptime 122 Days 21 Hours 45 Minutes 01 Seconds

                          AES_GCM_16
                          MODP_2048
                          IPComp: none

                          I used TRex a few weeks ago to run terabytes and terabytes through AES-GCM IPsec trying to make it crash. Hundreds of megabits per second for days on end. Could not duplicate.

                          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                          msrachelchenM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • msrachelchenM
                            msrachelchen @Derelict
                            last edited by msrachelchen

                            @derelict a few things were mentioned in the thread

                            1. 2.3 was unaffected yet 2.4 was crashing
                            2. issues appeared on VM and bare metal
                            3. there was a bug in the kernel
                            4. this "issue" first appeared 10 months ago
                            5. usr @RMB is using Netgate product yet he was experiencing the issue

                            Maybe I suggest:

                            1. Let us know if that particular patch was merged
                            2. Can you try running AES-GCM with any EC (say nist ecp384)
                            3. What do you suggest for us the users to get to the bottom of this?
                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • msrachelchenM
                              msrachelchen
                              last edited by

                              This is fixed in 2.4.4. If you are having issues try again on 2.4.4.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • L
                                lkolbe
                                last edited by

                                Just wanted to confirm here that the AES-GCM-crashes with AES-NI on our SG-8860 are indeed gone now on pfSense 2.4.4. No crashes since I restartet testing AES-GCM a few weeks ago.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.