Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Survey of ISP support for Dual-Stack IPv4/IPv6 Networking

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    8 Posts 4 Posters 1.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      bimmerdriver
      last edited by

      I'm having a discussion with my ISP about their support for IPv6. They support native dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 networking, but with some limitations.

      First, they support DHCP-PD only. They do not support IA_NA or IA_NT. They provide a /56 prefix (only). It's possible to concurrently have multiple prefixes delegated. I have three. I've never tried more.

      Second, the prefix is not static, although they will "attempt" to provide the same prefix if the DUID is not changed. In my experience, this works.

      Third, they will only allocate one prefix per MAC. If a prefix has been delegated for a MAC, they will not delegate another prefix until the lease expires. This seems to be non-standard.

      Fourth, the edge router will not respond to an RS until the DHCP solicit has been responded to. This seems to be non-standard.

      If you connect a PC directly to the bridged modem port, it will not get an IPv6 address, due to the above restrictions.

      I'm interested to know what support for IPV6 is provided by other ISPs.

      Does your ISP support static prefixes?

      Does your ISP support IA_NA or IA-NT?

      Does your ISP use the conventional RS/RA before DHCP solicit or the other way around?

      For those of you who have static addresses, do you also have a dedicated prefix, or are the addresses in the prefix allocated to other subscribers?

      If you connect a PC directly to the network, does it get an address?

      What is the name of your ISP?

      Thanks.

      JKnottJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DerelictD
        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
        last edited by

        What's IA_NT?

        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by johnpoz

          @derelict said in Survey of ISP support for Dual-Stack IPv4/IPv6 Networking:

          What's IA_NT?

          Islamic Association of North Texas? 😈

          Institute of Advance Network Technology ?

          Did you mean IA_TA?

          My current ISP does not have any ipv6 support (wide open west).. I run an HE tunnel for all my ipv6 connectivity. Have a /48 with them.

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JKnottJ
            JKnott @bimmerdriver
            last edited by

            @bimmerdriver

            My ISP provides up to a /56, depending on what the customer's router requests. They also provide DHCP-PD to residential/small business customers, but support static assignments to larger businesses. I expect they'd assign only one prefix to a MAC, just as they assign only 1 IPv4 address to a MAC. Not assigning a new prefix before the old expires seems to be an advantage for me. With pfSense my prefix would change for something as simple as momentarily disconnecting the WAN cable. This was later fixed with a setting in pfSense.

            PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
            i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
            UniFi AC-Lite access point

            I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              bimmerdriver @Derelict
              last edited by

              @derelict said in Survey of ISP support for Dual-Stack IPv4/IPv6 Networking:

              What's IA_NT?

              A typo.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                last edited by

                Multiple times? You stated it 2 different times.

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  bimmerdriver @johnpoz
                  last edited by bimmerdriver

                  @johnpoz said in Survey of ISP support for Dual-Stack IPv4/IPv6 Networking:

                  Multiple times? You stated it 2 different times.

                  It was a copy paste error. Surely you know I intended to type IA_NA. What else could be it be?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DerelictD
                    Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                    last edited by

                    @bimmerdriver said in Survey of ISP support for Dual-Stack IPv4/IPv6 Networking:

                    They do not support IA_NA or IA_NT.

                    So you meant to say IA_NA or IA_NA?

                    Not really sure what you meant. IA_NA or IA_TA?

                    Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                    A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                    DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                    Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.