• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

IPSEC site to site, remote private network behind a NAT

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPsec
2 Posts 2 Posters 956 Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S
    smitopher09
    last edited by Sep 25, 2018, 10:12 AM

    I have setup a site to site between pfSense and a Ubiquity EdgerouterX
    The ER X is behind an ISP NAT and does not have a public ip address. They will only offer me a public address for a 400% price increase.

    My home pfSense site is in Austin, Texas. Running 2.4.4-RELEASE. Just updated. no change in behavior from previous release
    My remote ER X site is in the Philippines

    I followed the recipes found at
    link EdgeRouter-IPsec-Site-to-Site-VPN-behind-NAT
    link EdgeRouter-Site-to-Site-IPsec-VPN-to-pfSense
    and
    link configuring-a-site-to-site-ipsec-vpn.html

    I can now access any host on the pfSense network from the ER X network .
    I can not access any host on the ER X network from any host on the pfSense network

    Am I missing something on my pfSense config

    The ER X config
    0_1537870179531_uberx_5.png image url)
    pfSense Phase 1
    0_1537870234859_pfsenseP1_5.PNG
    pfSense Phase 2
    0_1537870277137_pfsenseP2_5.PNG

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • A
      Alitai
      last edited by Sep 25, 2018, 8:53 PM

      Without a public ipv4 address i see no chance.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      2 out of 2
      • First post
        2/2
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
        This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
        consent.not_received