pfBlockerNG-devel feedback

bartkowski

@BBcan177 Can you see my post https://forum.netgate.com/topic/135362/geoip-policy-based-routing-not-working-with-pfblockerng-devel
To me it appears as an issue with the new version.

BBcan177

@occamsrazor

Blutmagie needs to have the State set to "flex" since the TLS settings or the certificates of the site are poor.

For the Dan.me feed, they have rate-limiting. You can move that feed into its own Alias "TOR2" and set it update every 4 hours... I might have to adjust the Feeds Tab to account for this issue. I have been after Dan.me for several months to try to improve this issue. Part of the problem is that pfBlockerNG checks the last-time-stamp of the Feed and Dan.me is counting this as a download attempt which causes the rate-limiting issue.

un1que

Since some days I have some troubles using pfBlockerNG. From time to time there appears a notification:

There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:52: cannot define table pfB_Level4_v4: Cannot allocate memory - The line in question reads [52]: table &lt;pfB_Level4_v4&gt; persist file &quot;/var/db/aliastables/pfB_Level4_v4.txt&quot;
@ 2018-09-16 00:38:28

Has anyone an idea what the solution might be?

BBcan177

@un1que said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

Cannot allocate memory

Need to increase the pfSense > System > Advanced > Firewall & NAT > Firewall Maximum Table Entries
The package defaults it to "2000000", but you might need to increase that value depending on how many Aliastable entries you have.

un1que

@bbcan177
Thanks for your reply! I’ll try that.

I now reloaded the IP values via force update and at the end of that process I found those numbers:

pfSense Table Stats
-------------------
table-entries hard limit  2000000
Table Usage Count         104384

Before your hint I had 600000 table entries set in advanced settings. But for only about 100k used entries it should have been enough, isn’t it?

RonpfS

And the table-entries hard limit was showing 600000 in pfblockerng.log before you made the change ?

un1que

@ronpfs
I can’t say yet, but I think at the end of the force update process it was showing 600k instead of 2mio now, yes.

Grimson

I just updated from v2.2.5_15 to v2.2.5_16, now the "pfBlockerNG firewall filter service" refuses to start, according to the dashboard status. There are no errors in the logs (checked both pfB logs and system logs).

BBcan177

@grimson said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

I just updated from v2.2.5_15 to v2.2.5_16, now the "pfBlockerNG firewall filter service" refuses to start, according to the dashboard status. There are no errors in the logs (checked both pfB logs and system logs).

Can you check this:
https://forum.netgate.com/topic/135893/getting-crash-reports-after-updating-to-2-4-4/24

php -v
php_pfb -v

Versions should match.

You can also try to start from the shell to see if it shows any errors:

/usr/local/etc/rc.d/pfb_filter.sh restart

BBcan177

@grimson said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

I just updated from v2.2.5_15 to v2.2.5_16, now the "pfBlockerNG firewall filter service" refuses to start, according to the dashboard status. There are no errors in the logs (checked both pfB logs and system logs).

I think its running:

ps auxww | grep pfb

/usr/local/bin/php_pfb -f /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc filterlog (php)

But now thats its a symlink and not a link, the Services function might not see the executable "php_pfb".

So as long as your still getting firewall events in the Alerts/Reports tab, then it is still working, just not showing that in the the services status as "running".

Still investigating...

occamsrazor

@grimson said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

I just updated from v2.2.5_15 to v2.2.5_16, now the "pfBlockerNG firewall filter service" refuses to start, according to the dashboard status. There are no errors in the logs (checked both pfB logs and system logs).

Just to chime in... same situation here, was shown as running Services before I upgraded to v2.2.5_16 but not now.

BBcan177

@occamsrazor said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

Just to chime in... same situation here, was shown as running Services before I upgraded to v2.2.5_16 but not now.

I posted a PR which reverts the symlink change... Will be v2.2.5_17 once that is merged.

https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/pull/575

Grimson

Sorry for the late answer, I got an emergency call from work and had to leave.

@bbcan177 said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

php -v
php_pfb -v
Versions should match.

Both show the same version:

PHP 7.2.10 (cli) (built: Sep 14 2018 11:32:18) ( NTS )
Copyright (c) 1997-2018 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v3.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2018 Zend Technologies
    with Zend OPcache v7.2.10, Copyright (c) 1999-2018, by Zend Technologies

You can also try to start from the shell to see if it shows any errors:
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/pfb_filter.sh restart

Restarts without an error.

I think its running:

ps auxww | grep pfb

/usr/local/bin/php_pfb -f /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc filterlog (php)

Yes it's running.

But now thats its a symlink and not a link, the Services function might not see the executable "php_pfb".

Yep, looks like it.

Xentrk

@bbcan177
I landed here by doing a search as I have the same issue. Thanks for the update!

Grimson

BBcan177 posted a quick fix here: https://forum.netgate.com/topic/136155/2-4-4-upgrade-messed-pfbng-beta/3 if the red status icon is bothering you.

stownplayer

Just updated and still have the same issue. I'm on 2.2.5_17 and the filter service is still red.

occamsrazor

@stownplayer Try the quick fix in the post 2 above this.... worked fine for me.

stownplayer

@occamsrazor We think my pfsense install is corrupted in some way. I'm going to re-install 2.4.4 and then reload the config. I tried those commands not long after they were posted and it did not work.

Veldkornet

On my dashboard, DNSBL always has a yellow icon and says

DNSBL is out of sync. Perform a force reload to correct.

0_1538905435877_11dec9f0-7baf-4b97-a9e7-cb372d0d80c8-image.png

Although I’ve already done a force reload a few times...

Also, unrelated to the above, would it be possible to allow the ability to choose your own certificate for DNSBL so that you don’t get certificate errors for the https page?

Hugovsky

after upgrade to latest _17, I can't open 10.10.10.1 with browser. pfBlocker seems to be working and logging fine but can't get the 10.10.10.1 page. Is it normal?