Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    pfBlockerNG-devel feedback

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    102 Posts 26 Posters 100.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • U
      un1que
      last edited by

      Since some days I have some troubles using pfBlockerNG. From time to time there appears a notification:

      There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:52: cannot define table pfB_Level4_v4: Cannot allocate memory - The line in question reads [52]: table <pfB_Level4_v4> persist file "/var/db/aliastables/pfB_Level4_v4.txt"
      @ 2018-09-16 00:38:28
      

      Has anyone an idea what the solution might be?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • BBcan177B
        BBcan177 Moderator
        last edited by BBcan177

        @un1que said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

        Cannot allocate memory

        Need to increase the pfSense > System > Advanced > Firewall & NAT > Firewall Maximum Table Entries
        The package defaults it to "2000000", but you might need to increase that value depending on how many Aliastable entries you have.

        "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

        Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
        Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
        Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

        U 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • U
          un1que @BBcan177
          last edited by

          @bbcan177
          Thanks for your reply! I’ll try that.

          I now reloaded the IP values via force update and at the end of that process I found those numbers:

          pfSense Table Stats
          -------------------
          table-entries hard limit  2000000
          Table Usage Count         104384
          

          Before your hint I had 600000 table entries set in advanced settings. But for only about 100k used entries it should have been enough, isn’t it?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • RonpfSR
            RonpfS
            last edited by

            And the table-entries hard limit was showing 600000 in pfblockerng.log before you made the change ?

            2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
            Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
            Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

            U 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • U
              un1que @RonpfS
              last edited by

              @ronpfs
              I can’t say yet, but I think at the end of the force update process it was showing 600k instead of 2mio now, yes.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • GrimsonG
                Grimson Banned
                last edited by

                I just updated from v2.2.5_15 to v2.2.5_16, now the "pfBlockerNG firewall filter service" refuses to start, according to the dashboard status. There are no errors in the logs (checked both pfB logs and system logs).

                BBcan177B occamsrazorO 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • BBcan177B
                  BBcan177 Moderator @Grimson
                  last edited by BBcan177

                  @grimson said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

                  I just updated from v2.2.5_15 to v2.2.5_16, now the "pfBlockerNG firewall filter service" refuses to start, according to the dashboard status. There are no errors in the logs (checked both pfB logs and system logs).

                  Can you check this:
                  https://forum.netgate.com/topic/135893/getting-crash-reports-after-updating-to-2-4-4/24

                  php -v
                  php_pfb -v
                  

                  Versions should match.

                  You can also try to start from the shell to see if it shows any errors:

                  /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pfb_filter.sh restart
                  

                  "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                  Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                  Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                  Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                  GrimsonG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • BBcan177B
                    BBcan177 Moderator @Grimson
                    last edited by BBcan177

                    @grimson said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

                    I just updated from v2.2.5_15 to v2.2.5_16, now the "pfBlockerNG firewall filter service" refuses to start, according to the dashboard status. There are no errors in the logs (checked both pfB logs and system logs).

                    I think its running:

                    ps auxww | grep pfb
                    
                    /usr/local/bin/php_pfb -f /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc filterlog (php)
                    

                    But now thats its a symlink and not a link, the Services function might not see the executable "php_pfb".

                    So as long as your still getting firewall events in the Alerts/Reports tab, then it is still working, just not showing that in the the services status as "running".

                    Still investigating...

                    "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                    Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                    Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                    Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • occamsrazorO
                      occamsrazor @Grimson
                      last edited by

                      @grimson said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

                      I just updated from v2.2.5_15 to v2.2.5_16, now the "pfBlockerNG firewall filter service" refuses to start, according to the dashboard status. There are no errors in the logs (checked both pfB logs and system logs).

                      Just to chime in... same situation here, was shown as running Services before I upgraded to v2.2.5_16 but not now.

                      pfSense CE on Qotom Q355G4 8GB RAM/60GB SSD
                      Ubiquiti Unifi wired and wireless network, APC UPSs
                      Mac OSX and IOS devices, QNAP NAS

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • BBcan177B
                        BBcan177 Moderator
                        last edited by

                        @occamsrazor said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

                        Just to chime in... same situation here, was shown as running Services before I upgraded to v2.2.5_16 but not now.

                        I posted a PR which reverts the symlink change... Will be v2.2.5_17 once that is merged.

                        https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/pull/575

                        "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                        Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                        Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                        Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                        XentrkX 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • GrimsonG
                          Grimson Banned @BBcan177
                          last edited by

                          Sorry for the late answer, I got an emergency call from work and had to leave.

                          @bbcan177 said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

                          php -v
                          php_pfb -v
                          

                          Versions should match.

                          Both show the same version:

                          PHP 7.2.10 (cli) (built: Sep 14 2018 11:32:18) ( NTS )
                          Copyright (c) 1997-2018 The PHP Group
                          Zend Engine v3.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2018 Zend Technologies
                              with Zend OPcache v7.2.10, Copyright (c) 1999-2018, by Zend Technologies
                          

                          You can also try to start from the shell to see if it shows any errors:

                          /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pfb_filter.sh restart
                          

                          Restarts without an error.

                          I think its running:

                          ps auxww | grep pfb
                          
                          /usr/local/bin/php_pfb -f /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc filterlog (php)
                          

                          Yes it's running.

                          But now thats its a symlink and not a link, the Services function might not see the executable "php_pfb".

                          Yep, looks like it.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • XentrkX
                            Xentrk @BBcan177
                            last edited by

                            @bbcan177
                            I landed here by doing a search as I have the same issue. Thanks for the update!

                            pfSense 2.4.4_2 | Intel i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz  | AES-NI enabled |  pfBlockerNG | Snort
                            Blog Site: https://x3mtek.com || GitHub: https://github.com/Xentrk

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • GrimsonG
                              Grimson Banned
                              last edited by

                              BBcan177 posted a quick fix here: https://forum.netgate.com/topic/136155/2-4-4-upgrade-messed-pfbng-beta/3 if the red status icon is bothering you.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                stownplayer
                                last edited by

                                Just updated and still have the same issue. I'm on 2.2.5_17 and the filter service is still red.

                                occamsrazorO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • occamsrazorO
                                  occamsrazor @stownplayer
                                  last edited by

                                  @stownplayer Try the quick fix in the post 2 above this.... worked fine for me.

                                  pfSense CE on Qotom Q355G4 8GB RAM/60GB SSD
                                  Ubiquiti Unifi wired and wireless network, APC UPSs
                                  Mac OSX and IOS devices, QNAP NAS

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    stownplayer @occamsrazor
                                    last edited by

                                    @occamsrazor We think my pfsense install is corrupted in some way. I'm going to re-install 2.4.4 and then reload the config. I tried those commands not long after they were posted and it did not work.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • VeldkornetV
                                      Veldkornet
                                      last edited by Veldkornet

                                      On my dashboard, DNSBL always has a yellow icon and says

                                      DNSBL is out of sync. Perform a force reload to correct.
                                      

                                      0_1538905435877_11dec9f0-7baf-4b97-a9e7-cb372d0d80c8-image.png

                                      Although I’ve already done a force reload a few times...

                                      Also, unrelated to the above, would it be possible to allow the ability to choose your own certificate for DNSBL so that you don’t get certificate errors for the https page?

                                      BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • H
                                        Hugovsky
                                        last edited by

                                        after upgrade to latest _17, I can't open 10.10.10.1 with browser. pfBlocker seems to be working and logging fine but can't get the 10.10.10.1 page. Is it normal?

                                        BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • BBcan177B
                                          BBcan177 Moderator @Veldkornet
                                          last edited by

                                          @veldkornet said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

                                          On my dashboard, DNSBL always has a yellow icon and says
                                          DNSBL is out of sync. Perform a force reload to correct.

                                          Although I’ve already done a force reload a few times...
                                          Also, unrelated to the above, would it be possible to allow the ability to choose your own certificate for DNSBL so that you don’t get certificate errors for the https page?

                                          For the Sync issue: Typically this is caused by having multiple feeds with the same "Header/Label" name. Every Header needs to be unique. Also can be caused if you have a duplicated Feed.

                                          For the Certificate errors, you can fix this in pfBlockerNG-devel, see here:
                                          https://forum.netgate.com/topic/136302/is-hiding-dnsbl-alerts-without-whitlisting-possible

                                          "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                          Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                          Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                          Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                          VeldkornetV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • BBcan177B
                                            BBcan177 Moderator @Hugovsky
                                            last edited by

                                            @hugovsky said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

                                            after upgrade to latest _17, I can't open 10.10.10.1 with browser. pfBlocker seems to be working and logging fine but can't get the 10.10.10.1 page. Is it normal?

                                            Any errors in the system.log when you restart the service?

                                            What happens if you try to start it from the shell?

                                            /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pfb_filter.sh restart
                                            

                                            Also check the pfblockerng.log for any errors.

                                            "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                            Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                            Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                            Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.