Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Chelsio T580-SO-CR

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    38 Posts 6 Posters 5.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • GrimsonG
      Grimson Banned @xlameee
      last edited by Grimson

      @xlameee said in Chelsio T580-SO-CR:

      Ether I am crazy or there is a conspiracy going on

      You are crazy. Driver updates and deprecation is largely done by the FreeBSD developers, not the pfSense developers. If at all the pfSense devs add additional drivers.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by stephenw10

        There is no conspiracy to break NICs I assure you. 😉 But feel free to review the source code:
        https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src/tree/RELENG_2_4_4/sys/dev/cxgbe

        What is the actual PCI ID of that card? Is it listed here?:
        https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src/blob/021c0c7c1ad07dad2227fb7529e176648cc53716/sys/dev/cxgbe/t4_main.c#L648

        Yes, if there are no errors you can see there a good test here would be to try the adapter in FreeBSD 11.2. If it works there and not in pfSense then it could be a change we've accidentally introduced and we can look into that.

        Steve

        X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • X
          xlameee @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10
          Sep 30 13:40:57 kernel t5nex0: <Chelsio T580-LP-SO-CR> mem 0xd9d00000-0xd9d7ffff,0xd8000000-0xd8ffffff,0xd9ffa000-0xd9ffbfff irq 48 at device 0.4 numa-domain 0 on pci2
          Sep 30 13:40:57 kernel t5nex0: fw init failed: 5.
          Sep 30 13:40:57 kernel t5nex0: error during attach, adapter is now in recovery mode.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Hmm, so some firmware issue. The t5 firmware modules seem to be loaded:

            [2.4.4-RELEASE][root@4220.stevew.lan]/root: kldstat -v | grep t5
            		112 pci/t5iov
            		118 t5nex/cxl
            		115 pci/t5nex
            		124 t5fw_cfg_fw
            

            What firmware version is on the card? Has it been updated?

            Testing in FreeBSD 11.2 is probably the next step though just to be sure it works as expected there.

            Steve

            X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              tman222
              last edited by

              I'm not sure whether this is helpful, but I have the T520-SO-CR version of the card and also experienced some issues after the upgrade from 2.4.3_1 to 2.4.4, though nothing nearly as severe as what the OP is going through. When 2.4.4 came up I lost one of the network card tunables I had set. I had disabled Flow Control on the card, and while the tunable was still set in advanced settings, the card showed flow control as enabled after the system booted. Oddly enough, going into advanced settings and opening the flow control tunable and saving it again would then disable flow control. I have not found a way to get around this, including adding the flow control options into loader.conf.local. The system will boot with flow control enabled until I manually disable it. Could it be that something with the driver did change in FreeBSD?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                It might have been. I'm not aware if any changes there though. Even if there were I would still expect it to conform to the sysctl settings.

                What values are you actually setting? hw.cxgbe.pause_settings?

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  tman222
                  last edited by

                  Hi @stephenw10 - actually I'm setting this tunable (covers both ports on the card):

                  dev.cxl.0.pause_settings=0
                  dev.cxl.1.pause_settings=0

                  This worked perfectly in 2.4.3_1 and prior. In 2.4.4 even with these values set under System Tunables and within loader.conf.local, flow control is enabled when the system fresh boots. Maybe something changed?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Well I would certainly try that variable I posted that should cover both ports. I wasn't aware that had changed but...

                    Steve

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DerelictD
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by

                      According to the 11.2 cxl manual page nothing has changed there.

                      How are you determining flow control is still enabled after boot?

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T
                        tman222
                        last edited by

                        Thanks @stephenw10 and @Derelict.

                        Two ways:

                        1. I first saw on the interfaces widget in the dashboard that besides just "10Gbase-SR <full-duplex>", "RX Pause", "TX Pause" were now also included between the < >.
                        2. I confirmed this by via sysctl from the shell and saw that dev.cxl.x.pause_settings was set equal to 3 for both ports.

                        I'll try hw.cxgbe.pause_settings=0 next to see if that might make a difference. Thanks again for all your help.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • X
                          xlameee @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10 here is what I get
                          0_1538385768270_2018-10-01_4-21-59.jpg

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            Ok so nothing different. Are you able to test that card in FreeBSD 11.2?

                            Steve

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • X
                              xlameee
                              last edited by

                              @tman222 I had that problem after I upgraded to 2.4.2_1 and then the same problem with 2.4.4

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                So can you retest with a version you didn't have a problem in?

                                The Chelsio driver can update the firmware on the card if it finds it's older than the version it has. That may have happened and it may be that that's causing the problem. If it is it would probably be a problem in any OS.

                                Do you actually see cxlX devices in pciconf -lv ?

                                Steve

                                X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • X
                                  xlameee
                                  last edited by

                                  OK my other server is working
                                  R320 exactly the same configuration and firmware and T580 firmware is the same and it is working perfectly just pfsense come up with the bug see https://forum.netgate.com/topic/136203/bug-v2-4-4

                                  3_1538409964397_chelsio-version.jpg 2_1538409964397_2018-10-01_6-20-23.jpg 1_1538409964397_2018-10-01_6-04-53.jpg 0_1538409964392_2018-10-01_6-01-47.jpg

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • X
                                    xlameee @stephenw10
                                    last edited by

                                    @stephenw10 yes I can I thing

                                    0_1538411091800_2018-10-01_11-12-38.jpg

                                    1_1538411091800_2018-10-01_11-13-14.jpg

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      Ok so that is comparing your two systems?

                                      Both are running 2.4.4 and both have the same Chelsio card in?

                                      In that case I would try swapping the cards between the systems and see if the fault follows the card.

                                      Otherwise can we see the complete output of pciconf -lv from both systems?

                                      Steve

                                      X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • X
                                        xlameee @stephenw10
                                        last edited by

                                        @stephenw10 I did still no change :(

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          So you swapped the cards and the issue stayed with the same system?

                                          Then if the same card works fine in pfSense 2.4.4 on the other system there is a difference with the system setup or something in the config that is different. The pciconf output between the two systems looks identical?

                                          Steve

                                          X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • X
                                            xlameee @stephenw10
                                            last edited by xlameee

                                            @stephenw10 Hello

                                            I just compare both firmware in lifecycle controller seems the stupid dell have mind of it own the lifecycle controller had upgraded itself to a newer version

                                            FIRMWARE:

                                            BIOS : v2.5.1
                                            Lifecycle Controller : v1.1.1.18

                                            HARDWARE I USED

                                            CPU: E5-2450L 1.8GHz 8-core
                                            RAM : 24GB ECC Registered
                                            Network adapter: Chelsio T580-SO-CR
                                            SAS Controller: PERC H310 mini
                                            HDD: Intel SSD 545s Series 256GB
                                            IDRAC: IDRAC7 Enterprise with dedicated card

                                            Some tips:
                                            iDRAC7 (if) make sure you disable auto update option
                                            Lifecycle Controller: Disabled - Just in-case

                                            I will tested to see if it works as is without tuning it and I will post it here so if someone wants to build system like mine won't go trough hell like me

                                            Thank you

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.