Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    WAN interfaces fail to return after power outage

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    49 Posts 4 Posters 8.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Hmm, well it appears it's not responding to ARP requests for some reason.

      Are you spoofing your MAC address maybe?

      When it's in that state try running ifconfig -v igb0

      And if possible run a packet capture ion that interface to see what it's actually sending and what's coming back (if anything).

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        peter_richardson
        last edited by

        Thanks Steve.

        I'm not spoofing my MAC address.

        What exactly is it that's not responding to ARP requests?

        I'll do some testing and try to replicate it so I can do a capture. Thanks again.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          It's whatever is upstream. If you connect directly and pull a DHCP lease it's whatever that is giving you as a gateway, 100.65.48.1.

          Steve

          B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            peter_richardson
            last edited by peter_richardson

            Seems that way, or might it be a problem with pfsense because it was happening with both WANs, 2 completely different service? And if it were a problem upstream, it wouldn't go away from just unplugging and replugging the cable, right?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • B
              bfeitell @stephenw10
              last edited by bfeitell

              @stephenw10

              Please see my post about a similar issue, and another thread I responded to. I think I know what is happening here, and it needs to be documented, and or added as a default setting in new installs.

              It seems that the dhclient code has been changed to respect the "interface-mtu" option that is being issued via DHCP by some CMTS equipment.

              I the cases I have seen the MTU is being set to 576, rather than being left at the pfSense default of 1500.

              In addition, the interface-mtu option issued via DHCP takes precedence over an MTU explicitly set by the user. To override the bad interface-mtu being set via DHCP, dhclient must be instructed to ignore the option. This is done by setting supersede interface-mtu 0 in the "Option modifiers" section of "Lease Requirements and Requests".

              When the MTU is set too small, it seems that DHCP renewals are failing. The failures coincide with errors like:
              arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for $GATEWAY on $INTERFACE

              I think this is biting a lot of users on the upgrade to 2.4.4-RELEASE, and the symptoms are quirky. If left alone, the interface may stay up, but certain websites will become inaccessible due to packet fragmentation.

              PRIOR POSTS ON SAME SUBJECT:
              https://forum.netgate.com/topic/136089/solved-and-revised-2-4-4-release-arpresolve-can-t-allocate-llinfo-for-gateway-on-interface0-dhcp-mtu-576

              https://forum.netgate.com/topic/136253/frequent-internet-loss-need-help-figuring-out-where-and-why-maybe-pfsense-modem-isp-or-all-3

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by stephenw10

                Wow, nice catch. And what are they doing sending 576?! ๐Ÿ˜•

                That does seem like it could be related at least. I'll be watching with anticipation...

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Actually that should have been resolved already in https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8507

                  If it does work that has somehow missed your install.

                  Steve

                  B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    bfeitell
                    last edited by bfeitell

                    From what I have read, I see references to the 576 MTU related to dialup connections. This might be an old fall-back that is being exposed only because dhclient now respects the option interface-mtu value being sent by the DHCP server. The value shows up in the issued lease. The changes in dhclient upstream are now exposing this.

                    This is worth exploring in connection with reports of WAN interface disconnections, unpredictable website connectivity, and may affect things like name resolution. When combined with the "IP Do-Not-Fragment compatibility" option in System/Advanced/Firewall&NAT, the small MTU breaks connectivity with some websites. I saw problems with the iHeart Radio website and streams, and with loading newyorker.com. Please propagate this up the chain. My earlier post has links to the issues as they are discussed in the FreeBSD development system.

                    https://forum.netgate.com/topic/136089/solved-and-revised-2-4-4-release-arpresolve-can-t-allocate-llinfo-for-gateway-on-interface0-dhcp-mtu-576

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B
                      bfeitell @stephenw10
                      last edited by bfeitell

                      @stephenw10

                      The fix discussed in Redmine doesn't seem to have made it into 2.4.4-RELEASE.

                      Rather, the fix of using the patched version of dhclient now in the FreeBSD tree is that the user must issue "supersede interface-mtu 0" to ignore the requested option 26 information. Dhclient is still requesting option 26 info from the DHCP server. The patch allows being able to supersede option 26 as issued with the lease.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        bfeitell
                        last edited by

                        I have opened a Redmine account, and posted in the relevant thread.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          I agree, it's certainly worth exploring. It could explain a number of threads here.

                          The value supersede interface-mtu 0 should be in the dhclient conf files in /var/etc by default. It is on everything I've just checked. If some connections are still seeing a 576 MTU then there must be some combination of factors that prevent it being added. If that is the case we need to find out what they are and stop that happening.

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B
                            bfeitell
                            last edited by

                            I have a sneaking suspicion that a prior manual setting of MTU on the interface may be interfering with the the setting of supersede interface-mtu 0 in dhclient.conf on upgrade. I know that I have previously hard set the MTU to 1500 on a number of boxes as a matter of course. In this instance, the hard set MTU will not be respected if supersede interface-mtu 0 is not making it into dhclient.conf.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              I think you're right. Working on something now....

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B
                                bfeitell
                                last edited by

                                Jim Pingle, the developer working on this has entered a new diff. Apparently, checking the advanced options checkbox and then saving and applying the config with no other changes entered, and then upgrading to 2.4.4-RELEASE, is enough to disrupt the fix the developers had put in place for the option 26 interface-mtu bug introduced by the new dhclient.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jimpJ
                                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                  last edited by

                                  I added a new note with a workaround to the Upgrade Guide: https://www.netgate.com/docs/pfsense/install/upgrade-guide.html#upgrading-from-versions-older-than-pfsense-2-4-4

                                  A patch is available that can be added with the System Patches package.

                                  The fix is discussed on https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/8507

                                  Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • B
                                    bfeitell
                                    last edited by

                                    Thank you! This is wonderful.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B
                                      bfeitell
                                      last edited by bfeitell

                                      I think this bug also applies to fresh installs using a restored config, not just on in-place upgrades. That is the case for the system I encountered this on.

                                      jimpJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • jimpJ
                                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate @bfeitell
                                        last edited by

                                        @bfeitell said in WAN interfaces fail to return after power outage:

                                        I think this bug also applies to fresh installs using a restored config, not just on in-place upgrades. That is the case for the system I encountered this on.

                                        Since it is a setting in the configuration and not a problem on the filesystem, that is correct. If you restore a config with advanced or custom options set there, it would fail this way.

                                        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • B
                                          bfeitell
                                          last edited by

                                          It is an insidious bug. I triggered the DHCP renewal problems by saving and applying on the WAN with or without changes. Unless triggered by the user, it will lurk until the next DHCP renewal fails, and that may not happen for 30 minutes or more. Looking through recent forum posts, I suspect this bug is in play whenever a user notices arpresolve: can't set llinfo for $GATEWAY on $INTERFACE errors.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • P
                                            peter_richardson
                                            last edited by

                                            Okay so it went a bit over my head there. Can someone please break it down for me? Where are we up to with this one? Is there a patch? Or a configuration change is needed?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.