Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    VPN no longer working after installing v2.4.4

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPsec
    7 Posts 2 Posters 1.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      aristosv
      last edited by

      Up until pfsense v2.4.3, this is all the VPN configuration I had to do, to successful VPN from my iPhone.

      VPN > IPSec > Mobile Clients > Enable IPsec Mobile Client Support
      User Authentication > Local Database
      Provide a virtual IP address to clients > 192.168.50.32
      Provide a DNS server list to clients > 8.8.8.8 / 8.8.4.4
      Save > Apply Changes
      
      Create Phase 1
      Description > VPN
      Authentication Method > Mutual PSK + Xauth
      Peer Identifier > Distinguished name > vpn
      Pre-Shared Key > <password_here>
      NAT Traversal > Force
      Save > Apply Changes
      
      Show Phase 2 Entries > Add P2
      Local Network > Network > 0.0.0.0/0
      Save > Apply Changes
      
      System > User Manager > Add > Username: <username_here> > Password: <password_here> > Save
      Edit user
      Effective Privileges > Add > User โ€“ VPN: IPSec xauth Dialin > Save
      
      Firewall > Rules > IPSec > Add
      Protocol > TCP/UDP
      Description > VPN
      Save > Apply Changes
      

      This morning I did a clean install of pfsense 2.4.4, and this configuration is no longer working. On my iPhone I get a message saying: "Negotiation with the VPN server failed".

      Anyone else facing this issue? Did something change on v2.4.4?

      Thanks

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        Logs?

        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          aristosv
          last edited by

          IPSEC logs here:
          https://paste.ofcode.org/fvHU9bu3fTbK6zYGyv5g5c

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            Oct 17 13:30:52	charon		08[CFG] <8> received proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_MD5_96/PRF_HMAC_MD5/MODP_1024, IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_MD5_96/PRF_HMAC_MD5/MODP_1024, IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_MD5_96/PRF_HMAC_MD5/MODP_1024, IKE:DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024, IKE:DES_CBC/HMAC_MD5_96/PRF_HMAC_MD5/MODP_1024
            Oct 17 13:30:52	charon		08[CFG] <8> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_2048
            Oct 17 13:30:52	charon		08[IKE] <8> no proposal found
            

            Your config doesn't match what your client wants.

            Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              aristosv
              last edited by

              So I am assuming the configuration to fix this, is under Phase 2 Proposal? I tried a few combinations, but nothing worked, so I selected everything but still no luck. And the configured proposals didn't change. So where do I change the configured proposals?

              https://paste.ofcode.org/YQm53ihV23Kxh6J84w4f7F

              alt text

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                aristosv
                last edited by

                So it was actually the changes here that created more proposals

                https://paste.ofcode.org/fgeLYyrqpmqFZj7NLs4t4P

                but now I get a "no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found" message. So I'm working on that. Any suggestions are appreciated.

                alt text

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jimpJ
                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                  last edited by

                  Oct 18 07:11:30	charon		06[CFG] <con-mobile|25> received proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_MD5_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_MD5_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:3DES_CBC/HMAC_MD5_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
                  Oct 18 07:11:30	charon		06[CFG] <con-mobile|25> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_MD5_96/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_384_192/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_512_256/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_256/AES_XCBC_96/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_192/HMAC_MD5_96/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_192/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_192/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_192/HMAC_SHA2_384_192/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_192/HMAC_SHA2_512_256/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_192/AES_XCBC_96/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_MD5_96/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA2_384_192/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA2_512_256/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/AES_XCBC_96/MODP_2048/NO_EX
                  Oct 18 07:11:30	charon		06[IKE] <con-mobile|25> no matching proposal found, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
                  

                  That looks more like P2 mismatch there, again, there was no match between what the client wants and what your firewall is configured to send. Looks like the client doesn't want PFS.

                  Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.