Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    What Netgate appliance should I choose?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    18 Posts 4 Posters 2.2k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S Offline
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Yes, contact sales directly for the best recommendation.

      Does the firewall need to be rackmount?

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A Offline
        apena
        last edited by

        Yes, 1 Gbps symmetrical. And is no needed to be rack mounted. I will prefer under 1000 €

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • RicoR Offline
          Rico LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance
          last edited by

          I'd go for the SG-5100 then.

          -Rico

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S Offline
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Yes, that's what I would choose in that situation. But our sales guys can discuss your requirements in more detail if you contact them.

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A Offline
              apena
              last edited by

              I thought you would recommend me the XG-7100..

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • RicoR Offline
                Rico LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance
                last edited by

                The XG-7100 is a great device as well, both the XG-7100 and SG-5100 run with the same CPU.
                In my eyes the main difference is that the SG-5100 got 6 separate GbE Ports, the XG-7100 2x 10 GbE and 8x GbE Switch Ports.
                You just have to check which one fits your requirements best. :-)
                And the SG-5100 is $100 cheaper then the XG-7100 desktop version.

                -Rico

                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Offline
                  apena @Rico
                  last edited by

                  @rico said in What Netgate appliance should I choose?:

                  The XG-7100 is a great device as well, both the XG-7100 and SG-5100 run with the same CPU.
                  In my eyes the main difference is that the SG-5100 got 6 separate GbE Ports, the XG-7100 2x 10 GbE and 8x GbE Switch Ports.
                  You just have to check which one fits your requirements best. :-)
                  And the SG-5100 is $100 cheaper then the XG-7100 desktop version.

                  -Rico

                  If in the future I go for 10GBe connected switches.. better go for the XG-7100, true?

                  SWITCH1----10GBe----SWITCH2----10GBe-----FIREWALL

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A Offline
                    apena
                    last edited by

                    I don't know that "switch ports" are.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • RicoR Offline
                      Rico LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance
                      last edited by

                      @apena said in What Netgate appliance should I choose?:

                      SWITCH1----10GBe----SWITCH2----10GBe-----FIREWALL

                      From your drawing when both switches reside in the same subnet behind the firewall you don't have essentially go for 10 GbE Ports... only when you really want or need to route 10 Gb Traffic.

                      @apena said in What Netgate appliance should I choose?:

                      I don't know that "switch ports" are.

                      Exactly what the name implies, it's a build-in 8 Port Switch. No big deal because you can discrete them in pfSense with VLANs when needed, just for your reference because the ports are not physically separate.

                      -Rico

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A Offline
                        apena
                        last edited by

                        Thanks a lot man!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S Offline
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Yes, the on-board switch in the XG-7100 is nice if you have a soho style setup where you would otherwise need an additional switch. But you cna also separate ports out into discrete interfaces using internal VLANs.
                          If you ever need to route traffic between subnets at greater than 1Gbps then you will need 10GbE ports. If the firewall is only between your switched internal network and your internet connection though it only needs to pass whatever bandwidth that can provide.

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A Offline
                            apena
                            last edited by

                            And.. If I could find a Dell/HP 1U rack for the same price?

                            • Basic Xeon
                            • 8 GB Ram
                            • HDD SATA

                            Will be better?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S Offline
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Well obviously not better for us / the project. 😉

                              Steve

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • johnpozJ Offline
                                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                last edited by

                                No prob not.. How much power that going to use? Does that HP support the company that makes the OS your running... etc..

                                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                SG-4860 25.07 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A Offline
                                  apena
                                  last edited by

                                  Yes you are right!
                                  I’ll go for the SG-5100... if my customer want to expend that money!
                                  Now is running on an old Compaq server!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • RicoR Offline
                                    Rico LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance
                                    last edited by

                                    If you can get Hardware+Software from the same producer it's always the best choice, they work 100% together and you'll get good support.
                                    With HP for example you will have problems with the Gen10 because there are no working FreeBSD drivers yet. I tried myself with some ProLiant DL360 Gen10 for testing ~3 months ago and could not even get through the pfSense 2.4.3-p1 Installer...
                                    If you want some 100% reliable out of the Box pfSense without tinker just get one Netgate appliance and be happy. :-)

                                    -Rico

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.