Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    When creating self signed certificate, no prompts

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    51 Posts 5 Posters 6.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      markn6262
      last edited by

      I instead could use an https server if a pfsense pkg existed. A portal seems too intrusive for the need. Using mini_httpd to display a basic notification page explaining to clients why service is interrupted. I have mini_https working as an http server with many misses “page not found” because most web sites are https. Don’t find a method to redirect an https web browser request to a static http page.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Where and when exactly are you trying to show these pages?

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by

          If you need to create and sign certs use the CA manager that is part of pfsense. You can download the file in PEM format and install to whatever you want.. Using some openssl cmd line from some freebsd doc is not how you would do it in pfsense.

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            I suspect he may be running mini_httpd in pfSense. 😬
            Which is why he's attempting to do it like this.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jimpJ
              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
              last edited by

              A self-signed cert will result in browser errors for that kind of setup anyhow. Do not do this to/with your firewall. It is not going to have the result you want.

              Back up and explain in more detail what you're trying to accomplish and why, maybe there will be an alternative solution that doesn't involve compromising the security of your firewall.

              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

              Do not Chat/PM for help!

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                markn6262
                last edited by

                @johnpoz Thanks I’ll try the CA Mgr & report back.
                @ stephenw10 I installed mini_httpd via ssl command line. Lauching with PfSense Cron so it survives PfSense reboots & updates. I have a few alias ip lists with rules that redirects webpage requests to the applicable mini_httpd hosted webpage to notify of RIAA violations, non-payment & maintenance downtime to reduce complaint calls & letters. Saves staff time & customer confusion.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  Unless customers trust the CA you create in the CA manager - they are still going to balk at any certs you create.. If you want to strangers to trust your certs - they have to be signed by public CA that everyone's browsers trust out of the box. You could use ACME for such certs.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    markn6262 @jimp
                    last edited by

                    @jimp Plan on purchasing a signed cert. Self-signed is for testing at this point. Dont want users to have to accept an unsigned cert through prompts. The rule after the redirect rule is to block all traffic in alias so a response to the redirect webpage is needed before a client is unblocked. Hope this helps the security question. Open to other approaches.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      markn6262 @johnpoz
                      last edited by

                      @johnpoz Thats my intent, thanks. Looking @ others, I’ll check out ACME.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        markn6262 @johnpoz
                        last edited by

                        @johnpoz Also should mention I’m running mini_httpd localhost with access only by client pool on private lan subnet.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpozJ
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                          last edited by

                          If access is by clients under your control - then very simple to have them all trust your CA... Then you can issue whatever certs you want for any fqdn and or IP address via SAN and they will accept it without complaining.. This allows for use of domains and or IPs that no public CA would ever sign off on...

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            So this is to redirect customers trying to access pages on servers hosted behind your firewall?

                            Or your customers are on the inside trying to connect out and need to be notified?

                            I still expect a cert error there since users will be trying to connect to https://somehost and your error page will not be that host.

                            Steve

                            M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              markn6262 @stephenw10
                              last edited by

                              @stephenw10 Customers are on the inside trying to connect out and need to be notified.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • johnpozJ
                                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                last edited by

                                Well that is always going to FAIL with cert error..

                                If I try and go to https://www.google.com you can not redirect me to https://whatever and expect it not to throw an error.. Not unless you doing MITM with a proxy - where your generating the certs for whatever fqdn they are trying to access.

                                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  markn6262 @johnpoz
                                  last edited by

                                  @johnpoz You lost me a bit. I'm new to this CA stuff other than that needed for OpenVpn that I employ. I do know mini_httpd needs a CA with a common name equal to the host ip, 127.0.0.1 Are you saying ACME or other will not offer a signed CA to a private IP? Not understanding your work-around solution. Via SAN (storage area network)?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    markn6262 @stephenw10
                                    last edited by

                                    @stephenw10 Right now I'm getting cert warning because it's self-signed. View of self-signed shows company name, contact info, etc. but don't expect many will bother looking. When self-signed is accepted by client it does take the client to the proper hosted html page. Testing with myself as a client currently.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • johnpozJ
                                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                      last edited by

                                      No you can offer up whatever cert you want... But since the common name or SAN does not match where your going the clients browser is going to throw a flag about it..

                                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        markn6262 @johnpoz
                                        last edited by

                                        @johnpoz So your saying I can't purchase a signed CA with a matching common name to the host IP? Any solution to this so client doesn't get prompts. The latter is the only obstacle remaining to good functionality.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M
                                          markn6262 @johnpoz
                                          last edited by

                                          @johnpoz This is not what I wanted to hear. So is there another solution to this? Do I have to host in the public domain and redirect there? Seems less secure. And when the redirect is internet outage, I need a local host to serve the page.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • johnpozJ
                                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                            last edited by johnpoz

                                            You can for sure buy a cert or have a client trust a cert for host.domain.tld... And if your browser goes to host.domain.tld you will be fine and browser will be all happy.

                                            But when client ties to go to https://otherhost.otherdomain.tld and gets some page signed for host.domain.tld its going to complain about it..

                                            edit:
                                            There really is no "solution" to this ;) Welcome to HTTPS.. You would have to generate a cert on the fly that is signed by a CA the client trusts for https://otherhost.otherdomain.tld

                                            And then even then with hsts you could have problems...

                                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.