Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Failing cloudsense fragmented packets test

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    15 Posts 2 Posters 785 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
      last edited by johnpoz

      They have 2 pages... Why would you care to be testing ipv4 when you stated your problem is via ipv6..

      While I am a fan of IPv6 - its not something that is REQUIRED to use the net... You can think it is all you want... Its just not there yet..

      They have the tcpdump listed on the page.. just hit it in your browser and scroll down... What account are you running that as.. what version of pfsense... Looks like you get permission denied?

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        chrcoluk
        last edited by chrcoluk

        Sorry for the confusion I didnt state its a ipv6 problem but I accept I did link to a ipv6 test page.

        But anyway, any suggestions aside from turning off the current gen ip protocol. It is not a ipv6 specific problem.

        The tcpdump command provided on their page is invalid, it reports this.

        tcpdump: any: No such device exists

        pfSense CE 2.7.2

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by johnpoz

          So are you using IPv6 or not? You do understand that clients will use ipv6, and fall back to IPv4... So you need to validate where your having a problem with only IPv4

          " or load only after a long unexplained pause and feel this could be related."

          This screams of fallback to IPv4 from IPv6 to me..

          edit: You have to call out the actually interface... in the tcpdump command.

          Here ipv6 test down my HE tunnel which is on gif0
          0_1544720258749_test.png

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            chrcoluk
            last edited by chrcoluk

            Since you appear confused I will clarify.

            We are talking about the failure of this specific command.

            curl -v -s http://icmpcheck.popcount.org/frag -o /dev/null

            This is an ipv4 hostname and as thus an ipv4 test, zilch to do with ipv6.

            I understand this also fails

            curl -v -s http://icmpcheckv6.popcount.org/frag -o /dev/null, and that one is a ipv6 test but lets please concentrate on the ipv4 test.

            So ipv4 fragments not arriving is the problem at hand.

            The sites in question are not ipv6 sites, ipv6 sites load fine e.g. youtube and netflix utilise ipv6. It is not a internet noob not recognising ipv6 to ipv4 fallback delays :) Typically the problematic sites tend to be very old unmaintained sites, no modern sites cause this and indeed the pfsense forum we are on now is loading from ipv6.

            Also the Dc install is 2.4.4, my LAN install is 2.4.4-p1

            here is output of tcpdump

            [2.4.4-RELEASE][admin@pfSense.localdomain]/root: tcpdump -ni vtnet0 '(ip[6] & (1<<5)) != 0 or (ip[7] != 0) or (ip[6] & ((1<<5)-1) != 0) or ip6[6] == 44'
            tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
            listening on vtnet0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes
            17:01:01.149318 IP 139.162.188.91.80 > 88.198.64.148.9344: Flags [.], seq 1059434196:1059434676, ack 1855695002, win 227, options [nop,nop,TS val 1574322922 ecr 462037901], length 480: HTTP
            17:01:01.149345 IP 139.162.188.91 > 88.198.x,x: ip-proto-6
            17:01:01.149357 IP 139.162.188.91 > 88.198.x,x: ip-proto-6
            17:01:01.180237 IP 139.162.188.91.80 > 88.198.x.x.9344: Flags [.], seq 1448:1928, ack 1, win 227, options [nop,nop,TS val 1574322922 ecr 462037901], length 480: HTTP
            17:01:01.180266 IP 139.162.188.91 > 88.198.x.x: ip-proto-6
            17:01:01.180279 IP 139.162.188.91 > 88.198.x.x: ip-proto-6
            17:01:01.210996 IP 139.162.188.91.80 > 88.198.x.x.9344: Flags [P.], seq 2896:3376, ack 1, win 227, options [nop,nop,TS val 1574322922 ecr 462037901], length 480: HTTP
            17:01:01.211026 IP 139.162.188.91 > 88.198.x.x: ip-proto-6
            17:01:01.211047 IP 139.162.188.91 > 88.198.x.x: ip-proto-6
            17:01:01.246718 IP 139.162.188.91.80 > 88.198.x.x.9344: Flags [.], seq 4096:4576, ack 1, win 227, options [nop,nop,TS val 1574322922 ecr 462037901], length 480: HTTP
            17:01:01.246746 IP 139.162.188.91 > 88.198.x.x: ip-proto-6
            17:01:01.246757 IP 139.162.188.91 > 88.198.x.x: ip-proto-6
            17:01:01.278593 IP 139.162.188.91.80 > 88.198.x.x.9344: Flags [.], seq 5544:6024, ack 1, win 227, options [nop,nop,TS val 1574322922 ecr 462037901], length 480: HTTP
            17:01:01.278620 IP 139.162.188.91 > 88.198.x.x: ip-proto-6
            17:01:01.278631 IP 139.162.188.91 > 88.198.x.x: ip-proto-6
            

            pfSense CE 2.7.2

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by

              Well you should prob remove the links to the ipv6 test then ;)

              Don't see your frag stuff... So you prob have something between you and where your trying to go breaking PMTUD.. This has nothing to do with pfsense.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                chrcoluk
                last edited by chrcoluk

                So

                In the DC case, pfsense is hosted on proxmox. It has a virtual switch between it and the proxmox host. The proxmox host is fine but the pfsense VM is not.

                At home, I have the same problem, but I have no device in front of pfsense to test otherwise, I could I suppose hook up another router but really dont want to do that.

                I am not saying I disagree with you, but you jumped to the conclusion very quickly.

                pfSense CE 2.7.2

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by johnpoz

                  do the other test
                  [2.4.4-RELEASE][root@sg4860.local.lan]/root: curl -v -s http://icmpcheck.popcount.org/icmp --data @payload.bin

                  • Trying 139.162.188.91...
                  • TCP_NODELAY set
                  • Connected to icmpcheck.popcount.org (139.162.188.91) port 80 (#0)

                  POST /icmp HTTP/1.1
                  Host: icmpcheck.popcount.org
                  User-Agent: curl/7.62.0
                  Accept: /
                  Content-Length: 0
                  Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

                  < HTTP/1.1 200 OK
                  < Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:09:58 GMT
                  < Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
                  < Connection: close
                  < Transfer-Encoding: chunked
                  <
                  {"msg1": "Upload complete", "mtu":1500, "lost_segs":0, "retrans_segs":0, "total_retrans_segs":0, "reord_segs":3, "snd_mss":1448, "rcv_mss":536}

                  • Closing connection 0
                    [2.4.4-RELEASE][root@sg4860.local.lan]/root:

                  As to conclusion quickly - there was a recent thread with issue but with IPv6.. Same urls using, etc.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    chrcoluk
                    last edited by chrcoluk

                    is good

                    root@PFSENSE tmp # curl -v -s http://icmpcheck.popcount.org/icmp --data @payload.bin
                    *   Trying 139.162.188.91...
                    * TCP_NODELAY set
                    * Connected to icmpcheck.popcount.org (139.162.188.91) port 80 (#0)
                    > POST /icmp HTTP/1.1
                    > Host: icmpcheck.popcount.org
                    > User-Agent: curl/7.62.0
                    > Accept: */*
                    > Content-Length: 0
                    > Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
                    > 
                    < HTTP/1.1 200 OK
                    < Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:11:19 GMT
                    < Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
                    < Connection: close
                    < Transfer-Encoding: chunked
                    < 
                    {"msg1": "Upload complete", "mtu":1500, "lost_segs":0, "retrans_segs":0, "total_retrans_segs":0, "reord_segs":3, "snd_mss":1420, "rcv_mss":536}
                    * Closing connection 0
                    

                    I notice the snd_mss value seems low on my test tho, especially considering I do have a mtu of 1500.

                    pfSense CE 2.7.2

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                      last edited by johnpoz

                      what do you get from here?
                      http://www.letmecheck.it/mtu-test.php

                      What about this test
                      https://www.speedguide.net/analyzer.php

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        chrcoluk
                        last edited by chrcoluk

                        The requested URL /mtu-test.php was not found on this server. Their ipv6 vhost is broken I suspect as I am accessing it on ipv6.

                        speedguide analyzer looks good

                        TCP options string = 020405b40103030401010402
                        MTU = 1500
                        MTU is fully optimized for broadband.
                        MSS = 1460
                        Maximum useful data in each packet = 1460, which equals MSS.
                        Default TCP Receive Window (RWIN) = 65696 
                        RWIN Scaling (RFC1323) = 4 bits (scale factor: 2^4=16) 
                        Unscaled TCP Receive Window = 4106 
                        
                        In Windows 8.1, unless "TCP/IP Auto-Tuning" is disabled, only the Current TCP Window is displayed. Use the latest TCP Optimizer for tweaking.
                        You seem to be using Google Chrome. Note that Chrome can modify the TCP Window for sockets it creates under some OSes, and therefore servers may not get your OS-assigned RWIN value. FAQ
                        RWIN is not fully optimized. The unscaled RWIN value is lower than it should be. Also, RWIN being close to and above 65536 does not justify the header overhead of enabling TCP 1323 Options. You might want to use one of the recommended RWIN values below.
                        
                        RWIN is not multiple of MSS. If your OS supports setting RWIN directly, consider changing it to a multiple of MSS for optimum performance.
                        Other RWIN values that might work well with your current MTU/MSS: 
                        64240  (up to 2 Mbit lines, depending on latency. MSS * 44) 
                        128480 (1-5 Mbit lines, depending on latency. MSS * 44 * 2) 
                        256960 (2-15 Mbit lines, depending on latency. MSS * 44 * 2^2) 
                        513920 (10-30 Mbit lines, depending on latency. MSS * 44 * 2^3) 
                        1027840 (30-100 Mbit lines depending on latency. MSS * 44 * 2^4) 
                        bandwidth * delay product (Note this is not a speed test):
                        
                        Your current TCP Window limits you to: 2628 kbps (328 KBytes/s) @ 200ms latency
                        Your current TCP Window limits you to: 1051 kbps (131 KBytes/s) @ 500ms latency
                        MTU Discovery (RFC1191) = ON
                        Time to live left = 118 hops
                        TTL value is ok.
                        Timestamps (RFC1323) = OFF
                        Selective Acknowledgements (RFC2018) = ON
                        IP type of service field (RFC1349) = 00000010 (2)
                        Precedence (priority) = 000 (routine)
                        Delay = 0 (normal delay)
                        Throughput = 0 (normal throughput)
                        Reliability = 0 (normal reliability)
                        Cost = 1 (low cost)
                        Check bit = 0 (correct, 8th checking bit must be zero)
                         
                        DSCP (DiffServ) = CS0 000000 (0) - class 0, default traffic (RFC 2474).
                        

                        pfSense CE 2.7.2

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          chrcoluk
                          last edited by chrcoluk

                          Ok I set the preference level on my windows desktop for ipv6 below ipv4 and ran the first link again, here is the result.

                          Sending 32 bytes to 87.81.x,x  <-  not fragmented
                          
                          Sending 750 bytes to 87.81.x.x  <-  not fragmented
                          
                          Sending 1125 bytes to 87.81.x.x  <-  not fragmented
                          
                          Sending 1313 bytes to 87.81.x.x  <-  not fragmented
                          
                          Sending 1407 bytes to 87.81.x.x  <-  not fragmented
                          
                          Sending 1454 bytes to 87.81.x.x  <-  not fragmented
                          
                          Sending 1478 bytes to 87.81.x.x  <-  FRAGMENTED!
                          
                          Sending 1466 bytes to 87.81.x.x  <-  not fragmented
                          
                          Sending 1472 bytes to 87.81.x.x  <-  not fragmented
                          
                          Sending 1475 bytes to 87.81.x.x  <-  FRAGMENTED!
                          
                          Sending 1473 bytes to 87.81.x.x  <-  FRAGMENTED!
                          
                          Sending 1472 bytes to 87.81.x.x  <-  not fragmented
                          
                          
                          From the tests we did, we can assume that 1472 bytes is the largest unfragmented packet
                          size. The MTU size would be 1500, made up from 1472 payload and 28 ICMP/IP Headers
                          and payload information. 
                          

                          pfSense CE 2.7.2

                          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            chrcoluk @chrcoluk
                            last edited by chrcoluk

                            Ok it is fixed on the DC instance now.

                            I simply enabled scrub again and it works. How strange is that? Considering scrub messes with fragmented packets. So with scrub disabled the frag test fails, are you able to test that?

                            Same fix works on LAN as well.

                            Ok glad the cause is found, it is odd, but good nevertherless. thanks :)

                            pfSense CE 2.7.2

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.