Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    gigabit internet with Zotac ci323 Speed bottleneck

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    11 Posts 5 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JKnottJ
      JKnott @chevywu
      last edited by

      @chevywu said in gigabit internet with Zotac ci323 Speed bottleneck:

      Recently, I was offered a good deal on gigabit cable (1000Mb/30Mb) internet here.

      I wonder why fibre ISPs still have asymetric bandwidth. With coax and also ADSL, there were valid reasons for it. Not so with fibre.

      PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
      i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
      UniFi AC-Lite access point

      I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

      chevywuC R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • chevywuC
        chevywu @JKnott
        last edited by

        @jknott what I got is coax. It's offered by cable company Rogers here in Canada.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          TheNarc
          last edited by

          Have you tried running iperf against the LAN port from a client on your local network? I run a CI323 also, just tested mine and got about 860Mbps UDP but only 350Mbps TCP. I also run snort though . . . not sure if that could plausibly impact TCP throughput significantly more than UDP. But the fact that disabling bandwidthD got you a speed increase of roughly 120Mbps would seem to suggest that your bottleneck is not necessarily the NIC. Have you monitored CPU and other resource utilization during your speed testing?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • chevywuC
            chevywu
            last edited by

            CPU usage doesnt seem to be problem. It's always low (<10%).

            Just ran iperf on TCP towards a local server:

            Client connecting to 10.0.5.11, TCP port 5201
            TCP window size: 64.2 KByte (default)

            [ 3] local 10.0.5.1 port 41649 connected with 10.0.5.11 port 5201
            [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
            [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 844 MBytes 708 Mbits/sec

            Just curious, is snort limiting your speed because of CPU usage?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              redstonemason @JKnott
              last edited by

              Hi @JKnott

              I found so much information from you and other contributors about pfSense on Rogers. Your response was very, very helpful.

              I changed out my motherboard, NIC's, SSD and still my intermittent disconnects did not go away until I turned off gateway monitoring and gateway action. I also followed your other advice here in this forum on how to setup DHCP6, DHC4 on the WAN.

              BTW, after all the trouble shooting, I am actually back to an old ASUS motherboard that has Intel Ethernet on board and then I have one genuine Intel single port stick in a PCI Slot.

              I am thinking of starting a new thread regarding all my investments in a new motherboard (in the past 2 weeks) (AMD APU) with a dual Intel ethernet card installed.

              Seems to boot but pfsense crashes within 2 to 3 days.

              Any thoughts would be much appreciated.

              Mark

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • chevywuC
                chevywu
                last edited by

                @redstonemason said in gigabit internet with Zotac ci323 Speed bottleneck:

                I turned off gateway monitoring and gateway action. I also followed your other advice here in this forum on how to setup DHCP6, DHC4 on the WAN.
                BTW, after all the trouble shooting, I am actually back to an old ASUS motherboard that h

                That's quite an investment Mark.
                For me, I think if I can't get close to 800Mb, I will probably downgrade to their 500Mb plan and save 10 buck.

                D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  Doboy @chevywu
                  last edited by

                  @chevywu said in gigabit internet with Zotac ci323 Speed bottleneck:

                  @redstonemason said in gigabit internet with Zotac ci323 Speed bottleneck:

                  I turned off gateway monitoring and gateway action. I also followed your other advice here in this forum on how to setup DHCP6, DHC4 on the WAN.
                  BTW, after all the trouble shooting, I am actually back to an old ASUS motherboard that h

                  That's quite an investment Mark.
                  For me, I think if I can't get close to 800Mb, I will probably downgrade to their 500Mb plan and save 10 buck.

                  Did you ever succeed in improving your download speed? I am also stuck around 550Mbs

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • chevywuC
                    chevywu
                    last edited by

                    No, I didn't.
                    I feel it's a combination of both NIC and CPU.
                    So, I went with a full workstation setup with a i7 3700 CPU and a eBay fake Intel NIC.

                    D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      Doboy @chevywu
                      last edited by

                      @chevywu said in gigabit internet with Zotac ci323 Speed bottleneck:

                      No, I didn't.
                      I feel it's a combination of both NIC and CPU.
                      So, I went with a full workstation setup with a i7 3700 CPU and a eBay fake Intel NIC.

                      In case you were wondering, i was able to get 750/750 working by tweaking it:

                      sysctl net.isr.dispatch=deferred AND Disabling the Kernel PTI workaround for Meltdown in System > Advanced > Misc.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • chevywuC
                        chevywu
                        last edited by

                        Thanks for letting me know.
                        I decided to upgrade on HW mainly because I want the box to do more. IDP, bandwidth monitoring and Traffic shaping...

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.