Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Can I route internet traffic from site B through site A via Ipsec VTI?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPsec
    34 Posts 7 Posters 4.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      Konstanti @gabacho4
      last edited by

      @ngoehring123

      I would consider an option of the usual IPSEC tunnel, through it too it is possible to pass a traffic outside.

      https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/vpn/ipsec/routing-internet-traffic-through-a-site-to-site-ipsec-vpn.html

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • G
        gabacho4 Rebel Alliance
        last edited by

        I had thought of doing that as well but really like the routed option more due to its flexibility and power. Perhaps @jimp has some tips for me.

        K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G
          gabacho4 Rebel Alliance
          last edited by

          The really weird thing now is that my phone says I have no internet connection yet here I am writing to you and browsing the internet. Something is ascew...

          K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            Konstanti @gabacho4
            last edited by Konstanti

            @ngoehring123

            That's possible. I myself use the GRE over IPSEC option and do not want to switch to VTI yet.
            Will wait to hear other forum members

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              Konstanti @gabacho4
              last edited by

              @ngoehring123
              In this forum, I read that some remove the VTI interface, re-create the tunnel , and the problems are solved

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G
                gabacho4 Rebel Alliance
                last edited by

                I'll give that a go. After everything else, it won't hurt!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  saeed
                  last edited by

                  Hi,
                  I have the exactly same problem, did you get find any solution?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • G
                    gabacho4 Rebel Alliance
                    last edited by

                    I did not. Last thing I tried was to remove the interface, delete the static routes, and the remove the p1 and p2 and do it all over again. No luck. So I went back to openvpn. I was super excited to use the ipsec route instead due to the better throughput and all.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      saeed
                      last edited by

                      Openvpn is cool , but unfortunately Iran's government filter it here, so we must find another solution.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G
                        gabacho4 Rebel Alliance
                        last edited by

                        Yeah I'm in a part of the world where I want the anonymity as well. Have you tried openvpn on port 443? Or does Iran filter on something more specific?

                        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          saeed @gabacho4
                          last edited by

                          @ngoehring123 Tried that either

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            ccb056
                            last edited by ccb056

                            Trying to get this working between China and USA.
                            I've got a stable VTI network, and traffic passes successfully between the machines on both LAN ends.

                            I create a LAN rule on the China router to use the gateway on the USA router, and it looks like some traffic is tunneled through, but not everything.

                            Webpages from a laptop can load some elements, but not all; and webpages from a phone don't work much at all.

                            I had this working on the old IPSEC with the 0.0.0.0/0 phase 2, but I really want to change over to routed IPSEC to address some other issues.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DerelictD
                              Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                              last edited by

                              https://forum.netgate.com/post/862316

                              Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                              A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                              DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                              Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Ok, all that blocked traffic you're seeing is TCP flagged traffic that is out of state. It's either blocked because the states have already closed, probably the case on that :PA traffic, ot because the states were never opened, usually due to rouet asymmetry.

                                https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/firewall/troubleshooting-blocked-log-entries-for-legitimate-connection-packets.html

                                You should be trying to find out why that is happening not just trying to pass the traffic anyway. Remove any floating rules you added there. You should not be seeing asymmetric traffic if this is setup correctly.

                                I assume pings work fine from the policy routed clients?

                                If you run a packet capture do you see both requests and replies at all points in the path?

                                Steve

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.