Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Domain override broken since 2.4.4 p2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    16 Posts 4 Posters 921 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
      last edited by johnpoz

      Yeah not a fan of that myself, but looks like his not just using single lable .local, but mydomain.local

      But yeah apple broke use of tld .local for everyone ;)

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      GrimsonG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GrimsonG
        Grimson Banned @johnpoz
        last edited by

        @johnpoz said in Domain override broken since 2.4.4 p2:

        Yeah not a fan of that myself, but looks like his not just using single lable .local, but mydomain.local

        As long as it ends in .local it will conflict.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by

          Yeah if he is a apple user he could have problems. I agree it's a BAD choice to use.. But still not sure exactly what he has setup, because of the mydomain.local.mynet cname?

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          GrimsonG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • GrimsonG
            Grimson Banned @johnpoz
            last edited by

            @johnpoz said in Domain override broken since 2.4.4 p2:

            Yeah if he is a apple user he could have problems.

            Windows 10 has mDNS support included per default in it's newer builds too.

            Back to the OP: Post the details your DNS config, as longs as it's all about internal domains it shouldn't be a problem.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by

              Not in mine - I turn that shit off right out of the box ;) hehehe

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • L
                luas
                last edited by

                Hi, thanks for your elaborate response!
                Yes, mydomain.local was for obfuscation. In detail, we have two subnets:
                192.168.96.0/20 (.mynet) with a couple of clients which are allowed to access subnet2:
                192.168.0.1/24 (.mydomain.local) - This subnet contains a Windows domain, and 192.168.0.10 is one of its DNS servers.

                I agree that .mydomain.local.mynet looks confusing; I guess that pfsense adds .mynet because I entered it in System>General Setup>Domain. However, this has done no harm in the past. It is not an issue as long as domain override works.

                @johnpoz said in Domain override broken since 2.4.4 p2:

                So your wanting to lookup myserver.mydomain.local - which is a cname that points to
                myserver.mydomain.local.mynet
                Do you have an override for that, if not then your going to get a NX since I highly doubt that would resolve on the public net, etc.

                I have a domain override for mydomain.local, yes. At this very moment, it is working again after a 2 hour outage:

                Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validation success myserver.mydomain.local.mynet. CNAME IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validate(nxdomain): sec_status_secure
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validator operate: query myserver.mydomain.local.mynet. CNAME IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: validator[module 0] operate: extstate:module_wait_module event:module_event_moddone
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: finishing processing for myserver.mydomain.local.mynet. CNAME IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: resolving myserver.mydomain.local.mynet. CNAME IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: iterator[module 1] operate: extstate:module_state_initial event:module_event_pass
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validator operate: query myserver.mydomain.local.mynet. CNAME IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: validator[module 0] operate: extstate:module_state_initial event:module_event_new
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: cache memory msg=2625586 rrset=4532884 infra=2576142 val=176232
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validation success myserver.mydomain.local. CNAME IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validate(nxdomain): sec_status_secure
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validator operate: query myserver.mydomain.local. CNAME IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: validator[module 0] operate: extstate:module_wait_module event:module_event_moddone
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: finishing processing for myserver.mydomain.local. CNAME IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: resolving myserver.mydomain.local. CNAME IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: iterator[module 1] operate: extstate:module_state_initial event:module_event_pass
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validator operate: query myserver.mydomain.local. CNAME IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: validator[module 0] operate: extstate:module_state_initial event:module_event_new
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: cache memory msg=2625586 rrset=4532884 infra=2576142 val=176232
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validation success myserver.mydomain.local.mynet. AAAA IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validate(nxdomain): sec_status_secure
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validator operate: query myserver.mydomain.local.mynet. AAAA IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: validator[module 0] operate: extstate:module_wait_module event:module_event_moddone
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: finishing processing for myserver.mydomain.local.mynet. AAAA IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: resolving myserver.mydomain.local.mynet. AAAA IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: iterator[module 1] operate: extstate:module_state_initial event:module_event_pass
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validator operate: query myserver.mydomain.local.mynet. AAAA IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: validator[module 0] operate: extstate:module_state_initial event:module_event_new
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: cache memory msg=2625317 rrset=4532884 infra=2576142 val=176232
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validation success myserver.mydomain.local. AAAA IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validate(nxdomain): sec_status_secure
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validator operate: query myserver.mydomain.local. AAAA IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: validator[module 0] operate: extstate:module_wait_module event:module_event_moddone
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: finishing processing for myserver.mydomain.local. AAAA IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: resolving myserver.mydomain.local. AAAA IN
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	debug: iterator[module 1] operate: extstate:module_state_initial event:module_event_pass
Mar 18 17:37:38	unbound	24418:0	info: validator operate: query myserver.mydomain.local. AAAA IN

                The response to the command given above slightly changed:

                [2.4.4-RELEASE][admin@pfSense.zeggnet]/root: unbound-control -c /var/unbound/unbound.conf lookup myserver.mydomain.local
The following name servers are used for lookup of myserver.mydomain.local.
forwarding request:
Delegation with 0 names, of which 0 can be examined to query further addresses.
It provides 1 IP addresses.
192.168.0.10            expired, rto 29307524 msec, tA 0 tAAAA 0 tother 0.

                Does this "expired" have to bother me? (anyway this is the response I get while it's functional)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by johnpoz

                  And no where do I see unbound actually talking to 0.10

                  As to working... You sure your clients are just asking it directly... Have seen it 1000 times, client has multiple NS listed..

                  if you Level 3 of logging and unbound actually asks and gets a response it would be logged. See my tests above.

                  If your clients are in the .mynet domain, then yeah they will add that to search suffix, etc..

                  Here is what I can tell you for sure - it works, its works well, it works easy... You need to figure out what you have wrong to why its not working.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • L
                    luas
                    last edited by

                    I agree that your responses look different, pointing out the nameserver talking to. No idea why this is not pointed out in my logs, even though setting the same log level as you did.
                    I tried to increase log level to 4 or 5, but this seems to overwhelm my machine (CPU going up and logs no longer recorded)

                    @johnpoz said in Domain override broken since 2.4.4 p2:

                    You sure your clients are just asking it directly

                    For troubleshooting, I'm currently using Diagnostics>DNS lookup, so client configuration should not be an issue.

                    One last thing that confuses me: what exactly does pfsense with multiple DNS servers configured?
                    98ebd03c-aae3-4207-91df-9973b2c90079-image.png
                    This request for an internal server should be answered by 127.0.0.1. It seems that externals servers are still queried (one per WAN line) and I won't get a response before all of them have answered. Shouldn't it be so that requests for internal domains should stay internal? Could this be part of the answer?

                    Does it make sense to post my complete DNS configuration here?

                    Again, thanks for your support!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                      last edited by

                      Looks like your forwarding, or have dns setup in general, or letting get dns from dhcp..

                      If your using resolver.. You should have nothing setup in general for dns, you should make sure that you do not allow dns from dhcp.

                      And yeah when you do diag like that all you should see is loopback 127.0.0.1

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • L
                        luas
                        last edited by luas

                        I agree by now that this is not a "domain override" issue, because I stumbled across a different problem these days.
                        We use DNSBL, which seems to use its own certificate to break SSL encryption. As far as I can see, this certificate was generated during installation and worked for a couple of weeks, until it was suddenly rejected by browsers ("Certificate could not be verified as the issuer is unknown").
                        As a quick solution, I disabled DNSBL and we haven't had domain override issues since then. I'm glad I didn't do a downgrade to 2.4.4 p1 :)

                        So, this issue can happily be considered as solved, and I'll open a new request for the DNSBL thing...

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.