Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    pfsense disabling firewall for one specific ip

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    25 Posts 4 Posters 3.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
      last edited by

      @viragomann said in pfsense disabling firewall for one specific ip:

      Do you have multiple public IPs or a public subnet?

      You have not answered the most important question asked!! If you do not have more than 1 public IP what your asking is just not possible.

      If you want to to expose some box to the internet, then just use 1:1 nat and there you go - done!

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • KOMK
        KOM
        last edited by

        At this point, we're not even clear on what problem he's really trying to solve. No big picture.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by

          I doubt he even knows what he is trying to do - make no sense.. and is utterly pointless in the big picture. Unless some public netblock is routed to you. trying to expose box A to the public internet with a public IP.

          Exposing any host in any situation to the public internet is a mistake anyway. Atleast if "routed" you could still firewall it behind pfsense, etc. 1:1 nat you can firewall it as well..

          But unless he can explain the reasoning behind this - just put it on a rfc1918 address and port forward the traffic you need = DONE!

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            sbwcws @johnpoz
            last edited by

            @johnpoz I've a block of 50

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • KOMK
              KOM
              last edited by KOM

              OK good. That's a start. Now what are you trying to accomplish that requires what you are describing?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                last edited by johnpoz

                You have a block of 50 IPs?? so part of a /26? Seems ODD number to give someone... And with such an odd number its not actually routed to you... So your just attached.

                If that is the case then the solution of a switch and putting the box in front of pfsense is your best solution.

                I would just use the IPs you want out of your 50 as VIPs and do 1:1 NAT to boxes behind that you want all traffic to go to.

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  sbwcws @johnpoz
                  last edited by

                  @johnpoz I've multiple public IP's, I just need one local ip which I setup as ONE TO ONE NAT to bypass my firewall, I appreciate all your quick responses but it seems like it's a joke to some people, I am switching from FortiGate 900D

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • KOMK
                    KOM
                    last edited by

                    It's not a joke but we can't figure out why you insist on doing it that way, and you refuse to explain what you're trying to do despite several requests.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                      last edited by johnpoz

                      @sbwcws said in pfsense disabling firewall for one specific ip:

                      ONE TO ONE NAT to bypass my firewall,

                      Then create an any any firewall rule - its that simple.. there will be nothing blocked.. Just natted.

                      If you don't want it natted at all - then connect the device in front of your pfsense and give it your public IP..

                      But I am with KOM here - you have not provide any info at all to why anyone would want/need to do such a thing. So to be honest it doesn't even peak my interest enough to think through how could be possible, if at all.. You could always get support direct from netgate/pfsense - with such a large deployment and moving away from fortigate sounds like enterprise level shit, have to assume you have a support contract with netgate ;)

                      You might be able to do some hackery shit with a bridge, etc. But yeah it would be messy!

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • S
                        sbwcws
                        last edited by

                        Thanks consider this resolved.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • KOMK
                          KOM
                          last edited by

                          20 replies later and we still don't know what the original problem was, nor the solution used.

                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            sbwcws @KOM
                            last edited by

                            @KOM You might need to scroll up..

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              sbwcws @johnpoz
                              last edited by

                              @johnpoz said in pfsense disabling firewall for one specific ip:

                              @sbwcws said in pfsense disabling firewall for one specific ip:

                              ONE TO ONE NAT to bypass my firewall,

                              Then create an any any firewall rule - its that simple.. there will be nothing blocked.. Just natted.

                              If you don't want it natted at all - then connect the device in front of your pfsense and give it your public IP..

                              But I am with KOM here - you have not provide any info at all to why anyone would want/need to do such a thing. So to be honest it doesn't even peak my interest enough to think through how could be possible, if at all.. You could always get support direct from netgate/pfsense - with such a large deployment and moving away from fortigate sounds like enterprise level shit, have to assume you have a support contract with netgate ;)

                              You might be able to do some hackery shit with a bridge, etc. But yeah it would be messy!

                              Thanks

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                sbwcws @viragomann
                                last edited by

                                @viragomann said in pfsense disabling firewall for one specific ip:

                                If you want to keep it behind pfSense why don't you want to go with NAT?
                                If the machine should get a public IP and bypass the firewall, why don't you connect it to WAN?

                                Do you have multiple public IPs or a public subnet?

                                Thanks

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.