Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfSense looses connection every 28-30 days.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    41 Posts 7 Posters 6.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Indeed the dhclient is independent of dpinger. Something it triggered may have restarted the dhclient perhaps but if it was able to pull a lease it would have done so anyway.

      You said the rebooting the modem also allowed it to come back up. I would try simply pulling the WAN cable from either the modem or pfSense and reconnecting it. Does that also bring back the connection?

      Are you running 2.4.4p3 now? It's possible you're hitting this: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/9267

      That is fixed in current 2.5 snapshots if you're able to test one.

      Steve

      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jacksnack2 @stephenw10
        last edited by

        @stephenw10 Bug #9267 does give me hope in a resolution.

        I will look into this.

        Thank You.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DerelictD
          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
          last edited by

          That redmine does not seem to match. The packet capture is pretty clear. At least it seems pretty clear to me.

          Another test would be not rebooting anything and simply disconnecting the coax from the modem, letting it drop, and reconnecting it. That would eliminate any interface bounces unless the modem does one in that case.

          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Yes, you're right. In the case of that bug the client stops requesting a new lease but here it clearly continues. Ignore me! 🙄

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jacksnack2
              last edited by jacksnack2

              https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/9267
              "...DHCP timeout occurs and the cached gateway address is not pingable. This results in a case where the cached IP is removed from the interface, but dhclient is informed via the exit status of 0 that the IP was added successfully. As a result, the impacted interface remains without an IPv4 address..."

              Seems plausible this is the issue.

              Why remove the cached IP?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DerelictD
                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                last edited by

                I have no doubt that might cause some people problems, but I don't see how it will make your modem stop responding to DHCPREQUEST/DHCPDISCOVER as it apparently does.

                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  Kimberly3475
                  last edited by Kimberly3475

                  What is happening when those ARP resolve messages start? You showed the end, what about the beginning? Is the MTU showing anything strange on the interface when it is not working?

                  dpinger is trying to ping the gateway address but it cannot because it is not receiving an ARP response for it on WAN. Then it miraculously does for some reason. ttrockstars

                  If it were me I'd packet capture for ARP on WAN and see what is happening. I'd just set interface WAN protocol ARP and a packet count of 100000 or 1000000 and let it run. Then get the times of the start and end of the can't allocate llinfo logs and see what's happening there in wireshark.

                  J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jacksnack2 @Kimberly3475
                    last edited by jacksnack2

                    @Kimberly3475 Thanks.

                    I will most likely start a packet capture in the next several weeks, as this is the time for the next event to occur.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DerelictD
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by Derelict

                      I would run it on the command line and capture both DHCP and ARP.

                      Something like this should work:

                      1. Stop any running capture in the gui
                      2. SSH or console in
                      3. Menu option 8
                      4. nohup /usr/sbin/tcpdump -i eth0 -c 1000000 -s 0 -w /root/packetcapture.cap arp or port 67 &
                      5. exit

                      eth0 needs to be your WAN interface (em0, igb1, etc). You can get that interface name from Status > Interfaces.

                      You should be able to log out and the GUI should show the capture running there. Should be able to stop it and view it normally when the time comes.

                      You might want to start one, let it soak, and stop it to see how much ARP there is out there. It might be a lot and will vary due to the design at the ISP. You might want to up that count to 10000000.

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jacksnack2
                        last edited by jacksnack2

                        @Derelict hello.

                        I am going to do exactly that, but may from a Linux box on the network via ssh.

                        I’ll post back when something comes up.

                        Thanks again for all the help.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          jacksnack2 @Derelict
                          last edited by

                          @Derelict Thanks again for the reply.

                          However I think there is error in you command:

                          what does '1.' represent?

                          I ran this via ssh without the '1.'

                          ARP captures are brutal...filling the logs. Already at 554684. Is there anyway to minimize the captures to something more specific?

                          Thanks.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DerelictD
                            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                            last edited by

                            Yeah that's a mistake. Corrected.

                            Not that I can think of. You can do a circular capture that keeps overwriting the older files but you can miss the event if you don't stop it soon enough after it happens. See if adding -p helps:

                            nohup /usr/sbin/tcpdump -i eth0 -p -c 1000000 -s 0 -w /root/packetcapture.cap arp or port 67 &

                            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.