Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Upgrade from 2.4.4-p3 to 2.5

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
    12 Posts 5 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      netblues @A Former User
      last edited by

      @cdx304 What 2.5? 2.5 is not yet released for production use.
      And it might have worked for you but it would certainly not work for many others.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JeGrJ
        JeGr LAYER 8 Moderator
        last edited by

        Right! Let's repeat:

        Version 2.5 is still in snapshot state. No Beta, no ReleaseCandidate!

        Don't forget to upvote ๐Ÿ‘ those who kindly offered their time and brainpower to help you!

        If you're interested, I'm available to discuss details of German-speaking paid support (for companies) if needed.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          But thanks for testing! ๐Ÿ˜‰

          Steve

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            A Former User
            last edited by

            So far rock stable and no problems om my hp server i am using it on

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User
              last edited by

              I have a multicore cpu 6 core 12 thread cpu and from what i see is version 2.5 is utilizing the cores better than 2.4.4-p3 .And still no problems

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • NollipfSenseN
                NollipfSense
                last edited by

                The development team should get on the ball and release pfSense 2.5...some folks, such as I and others (OP), had already prepared for it with newer equipment then got the disappointed news that pfSense 2.5 won't require AES-in.

                pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User
                  last edited by

                  Yes i upgraded also to new hardware and with the announcement I was not to happy because my hardware is ready for AES

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N
                    netblues
                    last edited by

                    Why is the requirement of aes-ni so significant fails me.
                    AES hardware crypto offload is supported for quite some time now. Making it an absolute requirement certainly won't make any difference to the folks that already have aes-ni capable hardware.

                    NollipfSenseN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • NollipfSenseN
                      NollipfSense @netblues
                      last edited by

                      @netblues said in Upgrade from 2.4.4-p3 to 2.5:

                      Why is the requirement of aes-ni so significant fails me.
                      AES hardware crypto offload is supported for quite some time now. Making it an absolute requirement certainly won't make any difference to the folks that already have aes-ni capable hardware.

                      That's true; however, for over a year and a half the requirement to upgrade to pfSense 2.5 was AES-in...so, folks who wanted to continue growing with pfSense and didn't already had hardware capable for that requirement needed to get new/old hardware to meet pfSense 2.5.

                      pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                      pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                      N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        netblues @NollipfSense
                        last edited by

                        @NollipfSense And it was good they did. They benefit from much better vpn encryption performance.
                        The fact that dropping support for non aes-ni capable hardware could make the community smaller jeopardizing the longlivity and future of pf, is a far bigger problem.

                        NollipfSenseN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • NollipfSenseN
                          NollipfSense @netblues
                          last edited by

                          @netblues said in Upgrade from 2.4.4-p3 to 2.5:

                          @NollipfSense And it was good they did. They benefit from much better vpn encryption performance.
                          The fact that dropping support for non aes-ni capable hardware could make the community smaller jeopardizing the longlivity and future of pf, is a far bigger problem.

                          In this case, have two versions for a win win. The new folks who just spend money upgrading could quickly jump ship limiting pfSense growth potential.

                          pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                          pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.