• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Athp driver

Development
8
71
14.6k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K
    kiokoman LAYER 8
    last edited by Jun 24, 2019, 8:21 AM

    yes, i understand that, but i have 2 atheros mini pci express card, 1 for 2.4Ghz that use ath9k that work without problem and one QCA988X for the 5Ghz.
    i set FIRMWARE_MAX to 100 but i put a random value, default was 50 if I remember correctly.

    ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
    Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
    we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
    Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by Jun 24, 2019, 11:14 AM

      Yes I have two cards in there also. 😉

      But it would be a useful test. I was referring to some of the other stuff like the Broadcom and Chelsio firmwares. I've never tried to check what is loaded there by default though. More research needed!

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kiokoman LAYER 8
        last edited by kiokoman Jun 24, 2019, 12:25 PM Jun 24, 2019, 12:25 PM

        i am now on official kernel, after the introduction of ALQ, and that problem did not come out again/i don't need to modify firmware_max anymore.
        also i changed my 4 lan network card from realtek to intel i350-t4. i had too many trouble from realtek.
        so now i don't need to load if_re.ko anymore, maybe that helped.

        ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
        Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
        we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
        Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kiokoman LAYER 8
          last edited by Jun 24, 2019, 9:57 PM

          @stephenw10 i'm trying to understand why the athp0 is not recognized as a wireless interface in the gui,
          i track down the problem to this file: /usr/local/www/interfaces_assign.php at line 209 where it say

          if (preg_match($g['wireless_regex'], $_POST['if_add'])) {
          			$config['interfaces'][$newifname]['wireless'] = array();
          			interface_sync_wireless_clones($config['interfaces'][$newifname], false);
          		}
          

          it should save the interface inside a 'wireless' array but it doesn't do it, it save it inside a "enable" array

          i put a print_r($config); inside the php

          [opt5] => Array ( [descr] => WIFI5G [if] => athp0_wlan0 [enable] => [spoofmac] => [ipaddr] => ....
          vs
          [opt3] => Array ( [descr] => WIFI [if] => ath0_wlan0 [wireless] => Array ( [mode] => hostap [standard] =>....

          from what i understand, the 'wireless' tag is readed when you go to configure the interface
          i'm too tired now to go on, i will check further tomorrow, if you have any idea let me know

          ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
          Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
          we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
          Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by Jun 25, 2019, 1:07 AM

            Yeah I'll have to re-check tomorrow too. I'm pretty sure I found that previously though.... 🤔

            Steve

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kiokoman LAYER 8
              last edited by kiokoman Jun 25, 2019, 11:48 AM Jun 25, 2019, 11:37 AM

              found something new inside interfaces_assign.php

              if (preg_match($g['wireless_regex'] =>

              /^(ath|bwi|bwn|ipw|iwi|iwm|iwn|malo|mwl|ral|rsu|rum|run|uath|upgt|ural|urtw|urtwn|wi|wpi|wtap|zyd)[0-9]
              athp does not match preg_match, now i need to find out where this is defined ...

              found it
              /etc/inc/globals.inc
              need to add athp

              "wireless_regex" => "/^(ath|bwi|bwn|ipw|iwi|iwm|iwn|malo|mwl|ral|rsu|rum|run|uath|upgt|ural|urtw|urtwn|wi|wpi|wtap|zyd|athp)[0-9]+/",
              

              after adding it, you need to delete and re-add the interface

              ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
              Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
              we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
              Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by Jun 25, 2019, 7:31 PM

                Aha, that was it, nice!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by Aug 24, 2019, 11:27 PM

                  Hmm, I kinda lost track of where we are with this.

                  I have two ath10k NICs in my test box and they load up OK across 2.5 updates. I have some kernel modules in there but they are waaay old at this point. The only line required, seemingly, is if_athp_load="yes" in loader.conf(.local). It seems to pull in the required firmware modules without explicitly loading them:

                  [2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT][root@apu.stevew.lan]/root: kldstat
                  Id Refs Address                Size Name
                   1   22 0xffffffff80200000  3123108 kernel
                   2    1 0xffffffff83324000    d42f8 if_athp.ko
                   3    1 0xffffffff83621000      a45 athp_QCA988X_hw2.0_board.bin.ko
                   4    1 0xffffffff83622000    3cb9f athp_QCA988X_hw2.0_firmware-5.bin.ko
                   5    1 0xffffffff8365f000      fe0 cpuctl.ko
                   6    1 0xffffffff83660000     2678 intpm.ko
                   7    1 0xffffffff83663000      b10 smbus.ko
                   8    1 0xffffffff83664000     3110 cryptodev.ko
                  
                  [2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT][root@apu.stevew.lan]/root: sysctl net.wlan.devices
                  net.wlan.devices: athp1 athp0
                  

                  I don't see any sort of driver version listed in a sysctl.

                  I do see it trying and failing to load this:

                  athp0: ath10k_fetch_fw_file: firmware_get: athp_cal-pci-athp0.bin
                  athp_cal-pci-athp0.bin: could not load firmware image, error 2
                  

                  Steve

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    kiokoman LAYER 8
                    last edited by kiokoman Aug 25, 2019, 6:52 PM Aug 25, 2019, 6:43 PM

                    hi steve,
                    athp_cal-pci-athp0.bin
                    this is a firmware for calibration, not used/needed by us. I found it month ago and searched on google for what it was.

                    the only file we need to load are the one already present in your kldstat

                    the only thing that if_athp.ko do is to load the correct firmware for the card, in your case
                    athp_QCA988X_hw2.0_board.bin.ko and athp_QCA988X_hw2.0_firmware-5.bin.ko

                    also i found that if you remove *firmware-5.bin.ko then firmware-4.bin.ko will be loaded.
                    if you remove *5.bin.ko and 4.bin.ko then *3.bin.ko will be loaded and so on

                    i found somewhere a discussion talking about the difference of this firmware but the only thing that i rember now is that firmware-2 should be idea for AP mode. i tried all of them and saw no difference

                    ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                    Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                    we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                    Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by stephenw10 Aug 25, 2019, 8:46 PM Aug 25, 2019, 8:46 PM

                      Ah, interesting. Looks like the modules I have are dated May 14th, they must still be those you compiled.

                      I'll try to update.

                      Steve

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        kiokoman LAYER 8
                        last edited by kiokoman Aug 26, 2019, 10:39 AM Aug 26, 2019, 9:46 AM

                        there is nothing new from Geramy or Adrian, the last commit is 7 feb
                        but here is the new firmware i found
                        10.2.4.70.70.zip
                        from kvalo/ath10k-firmware

                        content of athp_QCA988X_hw2.0_firmware-5.bin.ko

                        ^?ELF^B^A^A 
                        ......
                        ^@QCA-ATH10K^@w^@^@^@^@^L^@^@^@10.2.4.70.70^A^@^@^@^D^@
                        ......
                        

                        ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                        Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                        we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                        Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by Aug 26, 2019, 11:52 AM

                          Seems good:

                          athp1: qca988x hw2.0 (0x4100016c, 0x043202ff) fw 10.2.4.70.70 api 5 htt-ver 2.1 wmi-op 5 htt-op 2 cal otp max-sta 128 raw 0 hwcrypto 1 features no-p2p,bit10
                          

                          Be nice if there was some change log. 2.5 years between those versions from what I can see.

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            kiokoman LAYER 8
                            last edited by Aug 26, 2019, 4:10 PM

                            nope, sorry can't find any changelog anywhere

                            ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                            Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                            we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                            Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by Aug 26, 2019, 5:35 PM

                              Yeah I couldn't see anything either. Seems to be working OK though so no significant regression, at least not yet!

                              Still seeing values in scans that cannot be correct in terms of channel or even the reported MAC. Some random data in there.

                              Can't wait to try media VHT mode 11ac mediaopt hostap. Just need some way to actually apply it I guess. Fun!

                              Steve

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by May 31, 2020, 11:25 AM

                                Anyone running this in a current, 12.1-stable, snapshot?

                                I tested the modules would load before upgrading and was surprised to find they did. But doesn't actually load the with the hardware in place.

                                I guess it's new modules time.

                                Steve

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • K
                                  kiokoman LAYER 8
                                  last edited by May 31, 2020, 1:43 PM

                                  not anymore, I have virtualized everything on ESXi and added a Ubiquiti ap-ac-pro, for me it was too unstable.
                                  but I have modules compiled for FreeBSD 12.1 if you want to try
                                  https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1fM-Jlmf8BY21kIEGueSxFWmrISZqcDj3
                                  there is a folder athp-12.1

                                  ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                                  Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                                  we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                                  Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                                  G 1 Reply Last reply Jun 29, 2020, 4:19 PM Reply Quote 1
                                  • K
                                    kiokoman LAYER 8
                                    last edited by kiokoman Jun 3, 2020, 11:12 AM Jun 3, 2020, 11:09 AM

                                    nice

                                    Sponsored by: Rubicon Communications, LLC (d/b/a "Netgate")

                                    Co-authored-by: Bjoern A. Zeeb bz@FreeBSD.ORG.

                                    we had to wait for netgate to chime in before something get done

                                    thumb up for netgate and bzfbd

                                    but idk when we can take advantage of the patches, that drivers are intended to be built against FreeBSD 13

                                    maybe with pfsense 2.6 ? 😂

                                    ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                                    Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                                    we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                                    Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by Jun 3, 2020, 5:56 PM

                                      Ooo, nice I'll give them a go.
                                      It's weird I'm seeing that firmware table full error that others reported before. It's been so long since I set this up initially I've forgotten exactly how I got past it. The notes I made that seemed sufficient at the time suddenly look woefully inadequate! 🙄

                                      Steve

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                        last edited by Jun 3, 2020, 6:44 PM

                                        Looks like current snaps are loading more firmware by default. Standby....

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by Jun 14, 2020, 10:36 PM

                                          And we're back...
                                          Firmware limit removed in current snaps.

                                          Steve

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.