Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Want to Access Switch from a Different Subnet.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    subnetrouting
    23 Posts 8 Posters 5.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      You can route between layer 3 subnets on the same layer 2 segment. You shouldn't do it.... but you can. 😉

      However the switch would need to be using whatever VIP address you add to pfSense as it's gateway in order to have a route back. It probably doesn't have that so adding the outbound NAT rule will allow it to reply.

      I say any of this only because:
      @aeboi80 said:

      ... but for the sake of learning something...is it not possible to access the web interface of the switch at all from the 10.10.0.0 network?

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • NogBadTheBadN
        NogBadTheBad @JKnott
        last edited by

        @JKnott said in Want to Access Switch from a Different Subnet.:

        @NogBadTheBad said in Want to Access Switch from a Different Subnet.:

        Knew I'd seen a brand somewhere saying L2+ lol its Netgear.

        That still doesn't say what L2+ is. Is it VLANs? Routing? Something else?

        I tried to look exactly what they meant by L2+, gave up after a few mins.

        Andy

        1 x Netgate SG-4860 - 3 x Linksys LGS308P - 1 x Aruba InstantOn AP22

        GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • GertjanG
          Gertjan @NogBadTheBad
          last edited by

          @NogBadTheBad said in Want to Access Switch from a Different Subnet.:

          L2+

          Easy : ISO 2 and above (?) ☺

          No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
          Edit : and where are the logs ??

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            pfSense4ME
            last edited by

            Layer 2 vs Layer 3: What Makes Layer 3 Switch Different?
            When comparing the Layer 2 switch to a Layer 3 switch the first thing to look at is what additional software functionality you are getting. When a switch supports Dynamic Routing Protocols, it’s no longer a strictly Layer 2 switch. Because static routing allows traffic to be routed between VLANs. In fact, the switches that add only Static Routing to their software features are considered to be somewhere between a Layer 2 and full Layer 3 switch. Sometimes called Layer 2+ or Layer 3 Lite. Unlike Layer 2+ switch, Layer 3 switch is Dynamic Routing ,which are used to link large networks together and share routing tables between them. They can also allow for dynamic routing of multicast traffic on the network.

            Google search:
            layer 2 vs "layer 2+" switch

            Source:
            Link_Info.jpg
            *Sorry for the pic but when I tried to input the url as a link or plain text it kept getting flagged as spam. If the link / pic is not acceptable (because it voilates a rule - apologies) please remove or correct.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • A
              aeboi80 @Gertjan
              last edited by

              @Gertjan Yes

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                aeboi80 @johnpoz
                last edited by

                @johnpoz said in Want to Access Switch from a Different Subnet.:

                WT

                This is the switch - https://www.tp-link.com/us/business-networking/smart-switch/t1600g-28ps/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Mmm, so static routing between segments/subnets. That's layer 3 in my opinion. 😀
                  I guess I can see why they wanted some in-between label.

                  Steve

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                    last edited by

                    Hehehe - dude really? There is layer 2, and then there is layer 3 ;) There is no layer 2+ heheheh

                    These stupid marketing nonsense terms.. If you want to call it layer 3 lite would be better than layer 2+

                    Where is this drawing of your network? Do you need some color+ crayons to use? ;)

                    While it is technically feasible to route multiple layer 3 on the same layer 2 - it would be the technical term BORKED if you actually do something like that ;)

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DerelictD
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by

                      A Layer 2+ switch generally has things like DHCP snooping but can't actually be configured as a router like a Layer 3 switch.

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                        last edited by johnpoz

                        So a smart/managed layer 2 then ;)

                        BTW, if your going to route and your wanting to access something on your downstream from a IP that is on your transit network you are always going to run into asymmetrical problems..

                        asymmetrical.png

                        If you want to route to other networks on your downstream, then that needs to be connected to your upstream router via a transit network.. If you going to want to get to it from devices on your transit network.. Then you need to host route on them, or you run into the above asymmetrical problem.

                        Connect your upstream to your downstream via transit network (no hosts on it) and your asymmetrical issues are gone
                        17216.png

                        Also if you created your SVI on the L2 that your 10 network is on, then its IP would be in the 10 nework.. If you created put the svi on a different L2, then you need to route it via a transit or host routes or your going to have the asymmetrical problems.

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.