Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Multi LAN routing help

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    16 Posts 4 Posters 1.5k Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V Offline
      viragomann @Mac101
      last edited by

      @Mac101 said in Multi LAN routing help:

      but when the firewall is disabled it makes no difference

      Which firewall? pfSense or that one on the destination device?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        Mac101
        last edited by

        the PfSense firewall

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • kiokomanK Offline
          kiokoman LAYER 8
          last edited by kiokoman

          the default rules for LAN is to permit traffic to any destination
          the default rules for OPTx is to deny

          show us with a screenshot what rules do you have on that interface
          and Diagnostic -> routes

          ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
          Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
          we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
          Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            Mac101
            last edited by

            advancef firewall.jpg firewall rules.jpg

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • kiokomanK Offline
              kiokoman LAYER 8
              last edited by

              ah noticed only now sorry, pfsense is a VM
              how did you pass the network card to the vm and why 3 ip?

              ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
              Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
              we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
              Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                Mac101
                last edited by

                The hardware platform has 6 nic's with bridges created on each of the 3 nic'c being used for the VMs. The intention is to have 1 network for VOIP, 1 for local lan and the 3rd for internet.
                I have used the 192.168.100.0/24 subnet in this lab environment to sort out any bugs before I change it over to PPOE and plug into my modem.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • kiokomanK Offline
                  kiokoman LAYER 8
                  last edited by kiokoman

                  i understand, it could be that you created an asymmetric routing somewhere.
                  here it's too late and i'm too tired to think of anything, maybe try some traceroute -i br0/br1/br2 and you could ask for the help of @Derelict or some other expert in the field if you post the routing table

                  ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                  Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                  we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                  Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ Online
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                    last edited by johnpoz

                    Your lan rule is tcp only - that is going to be a problem for any dns, etc.

                    You have a upstream router from your pfsense VM that is not just default route out in a double nat role? What VM platform are you on, how is everything connected both logically and physically.. You mention bridges - which is almost never a good thing.

                    I take it that network is just not transit - are there hosts on this network between pfsense and this other router - yeah that ill scream asymmetrical.

                    BTW - your diagram is bit small and light texting, maybe its the beers and now wine I am drinking but its a bit hard to make out.

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 25.07 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      Mac101
                      last edited by

                      I have fixed up the protocol issue on the LAN interface, thanks for spotting that one.
                      I'm not familiar with asymmetric routing, but assume that it is when the paths to and from a device are different. I honestly don't think that this is the case here, as the connected machines, physical and virtual, have the correct default gateway set. (ie 192.168.1.254 for lan and 192.168.10.254 for opt1). I have carried out traceroutes in both directions.
                      Lan to Opt1:-

                      • 192.168.1.254
                      • 192.168.10.1

                      Opt1 to Lan:-

                      • 192.168.10.254
                      • ************** timed out

                      I can ping from Opt1 to 192.168.1.254 but nothing else connected in that subnet
                      I can ping from Lan to any device inside either network.

                      I am using KVM on Debian 10 as the virtualisation platform.
                      Considering that I am only having issues in the traffic in one direction, I still believe it to be a config issue with Pfsense

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • kiokomanK Offline
                        kiokoman LAYER 8
                        last edited by

                        idk.. i'm using KVM myself on my ubuntu server at work but without the bridge part, you have already disabled pf and if it's not a routing problem i don't see how it could be a pfsense problem.
                        can you check with this if the bridge is working ?
                        https://superuser.com/questions/1211852/why-linux-bridge-doesnt-work

                        ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                        Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                        we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                        Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpozJ Online
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                          last edited by johnpoz

                          @Mac101 said in Multi LAN routing help:

                          but nothing else connected in that subnet

                          And you sure those dest not running their own host firewall.

                          If they are windows for example - they not going to answer ping from outside there own network. Just sniff on pfsense, when you ping - do you see it sending out the ping..

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 25.07 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M Offline
                            Mac101
                            last edited by

                            Thanks guys, this will give me a couple of new tools and approaches to diagnose where the issue is.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M Offline
                              Mac101
                              last edited by

                              Thanks, the stupid windows firewall was causing issues, or should I say stupid me for not checking that first. I can now ping and trace route in both directions however if I try to browse to the web page on 192.168.10.55 from the lan, the page does not load.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M Offline
                                Mac101
                                last edited by

                                Looks like another software firewall issue. The web page I was trying to access (FreePBX) must have som ebuilt in firewall preventing access outside of its subnet. I plugged in a cisco handset and can browse to the web interface on 192.168.10.56 from the lan without any issues.
                                Thanks again for your help in steering me in the right direction, I really appreciate it and I am learning heaps

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • johnpozJ Online
                                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                  last edited by

                                  looks like it does
                                  https://wiki.freepbx.org/display/FPG/Firewall

                                  Did you enable that module?

                                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                  SG-4860 25.07 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.