What is taking so long for next update
-
@johnpoz okay I understand that makes more sense so the program got more complicated so it's taking a little more time.
-
@johnpoz said in What is taking so long for next update:
Lets keep in mind that product has gotten way more complex since first release.. As something like this gets more mature and complexity increases.. Its not realistic to expect release every X days.. Not when the goal is quality, and not just changes and or releases.. If they wanted to - every single commit they could "release" Not how it works in such a project..
Many years ago, when I was at IBM, part of my job was integration testing of standard desktop systems. When something changed, the entire package had to be tested again. Changes are not taken lightly, not even updates to individual software.
-
I have been wondering whether there is a beta testing guide. I believe we all had been eager for an update that I want to start using V. 2.5 which was waiting on FreeBSD 12.1 that was released last November. I don't know much but to me, V.2.4.5 seems a waste of energy at this stage. FreeBSD even laid out a timeline for V.12.2 (https://www.freebsd.org/releases/12.2R/schedule.html)
So, I am willing to turn my home/office/lab network, despite the small amount of connections, to help get V.2.5 show on the road. I just don't know what to start testing other than Suricata/Snort, and Bill is doing such an AWESOME job already... or pfBlockerNG but BBcan177 also is already doing an AWESOME job already. Maybe some of the senior forum gurus can draft a beta test guide for network novices like myself so we can contribute more than bitch sessions.
-
@NollipfSense FWIW, I've been running 2.5 w/o out major issues for a couple of months. I'd say the base case is quite stable. But there are too many environmental variables for you to see issues with features you do not use. I'd just install it and keep up with the snapshots and forum.
-
@provels said in What is taking so long for next update:
@NollipfSense FWIW, I've been running 2.5 w/o out major issues for a couple of months. I'd say the base case is quite stable. But there are too many environmental variables for you to see issues with features you do not use. I'd just install it and keep up with the snapshots and forum.
Thanks for the vote of confidence Provels, I'll do just that.
-
@provels What a sense of relief when one takes the jump in the cold water!
-
And what was it in the 2.5 that you needed, that you could not wait til actually released? Curious...
-
@NollipfSense said in What is taking so long for next update:
I don't know much but to me, V.2.4.5 seems a waste of energy at this stage.
We have some hardware coming out soon that needs a new release which includes new code to support it, and 2.5.0 is not close enough to be done in time. Plus it's been a while since we made a release and there are plenty of important updates to get out to users.
-
There are still plenty of blockers left in 2.5. Limiters do not work properly, various interfaces are not behaving properly, and we need to move to 12-STABLE yet and shake out issues there. Plus all the remaining open issues we need to address. Some of those can be moved up, but not all of them.
-
@jimp said in What is taking so long for next update:
We have some hardware coming out soon that needs a new release which includes new code to support it,
Any chance nut and APCUPSD will work properly with newer APC UPSs?
-
@johnpoz Mainly it was Snort inline mode except for just want to help if I can, and anyway I can. So, now I have Suricata inline mode on WAN and Snort inline mode LAN.
-
@JKnott said in What is taking so long for next update:
Any chance nut and APCUPSD will work properly with newer APC UPSs?
If it's something fixed in the ports tree, maybe? We do not maintain the apcupsd port. If there is something it's missing in the port, it needs fixed there. From another recent thread I got the impression it was an upstream problem with the drivers. That isn't something we can really control.
2.4.5 has the latest quarterly ports branch (from a few days ago, 2020Q1), so if it's fixed there, 2.4.5 would have it. Otherwise, it'd need to be fixed in FreeBSD first and then we can maybe pick it back. That's not really a topic for this thread, though.
-
@jimp said in What is taking so long for next update:
From another recent thread I got the impression it was an upstream problem with the drivers.
I knew it was upstream. I was just hoping the FreeBSD team had fixed it.
BTW, that other recent thread was likely mine. I bought a couple of new UPSs a few months ago and found that they worked fine with Linux, but not pfsense. The older UPSs, which they replaced, worked fine with both Linux and pfSense.
-
@jimp My comment applied only to me...there was no guarantee that Snort 4.0 would work with V.2.4.5.