• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

ipconfig/all showing secondary CARP device interface IP as DHCP server address instead of the VIP - is this as expected?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved HA/CARP/VIPs
3 Posts 2 Posters 498 Views 2 Watching
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    jklmn12345
    last edited by Jan 14, 2020, 8:37 AM

    I am examining our CARP setup and just want to check what I'm seeing isn't a configuration failure.

    ipconfig/all shows VIP as default gateway and DNS server but the secondary CARP interface for DHCP server.

    I found this question on the forum. A reply states the pool is shared between the pair.

    This link from the ISC documentation says the same thing i.e. that the pool is shared.

    I can see that leases are sync'd. All looks good, all working fine.

    However, I just want to confirm for sure that I should be seeing a physical interface IP as the DHCP server instead of the VIP?

    NOTE: This question was originally in the DHCP section but I moved it here because it seemed the better location.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • D Offline
      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
      last edited by Jan 20, 2020, 7:15 AM

      You might get an answer from the primary or the secondary. The interface address - not the CARP VIP - will be the DHCP server shown.

      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

      J 1 Reply Last reply Jan 27, 2020, 10:57 AM Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        jklmn12345 @Derelict
        last edited by Jan 27, 2020, 10:57 AM

        @Derelict

        Thanks for the confirmation that the behaviour is as expected. Very much appreciated.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post
        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
          This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
          consent.not_received