Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Port forwarding

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    12 Posts 4 Posters 848 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • kiokomanK
      kiokoman LAYER 8
      last edited by

      rules are automatically generated when you configure a port forward. if you make a screenshot of what you have done so far we can see if there is something wrong

      ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
      Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
      we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
      Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GotYour6G
        GotYour6
        last edited by

        97e03e1c-c569-4809-a714-bff5c06e4cfb-image.png

        Dest is actually set to WAN not LAN

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • chpalmerC
          chpalmer
          last edited by

          You might need UDP instead of TCP on one or two of those rules.. Depends on the camera.

          Triggering snowflakes one by one..
          Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • GotYour6G
            GotYour6
            last edited by

            I got lazy and use an old screenshot, here is what it looks like right now.

            15f2b413-dd92-4769-82d5-a00a3c7fbac2-image.png

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • chpalmerC
              chpalmer
              last edited by

              So what do your actual firewall rules look like?

              Your NAT rules there actually overlap on the LAN side.. I don't believe Ive ever had the opportunity to try that..

              Triggering snowflakes one by one..
              Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • GotYour6G
                GotYour6
                last edited by

                WAN

                7e51d6ab-a776-4a01-b588-38de3b75f7b1-image.png

                LAN

                7e00bd33-13ab-4e2b-9aed-a714dd0f5ffd-image.png

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • chpalmerC
                  chpalmer
                  last edited by chpalmer

                  Flip your two WAN rules around so the last one is above the other.. See if that makes a difference..

                  Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                  Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                  GotYour6G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • GotYour6G
                    GotYour6
                    last edited by

                    I worked directly with the server software (UniSight) company and the guys that wrote the mobile app for the better part of a day, we couldn't figure it out.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • GotYour6G
                      GotYour6 @chpalmer
                      last edited by

                      @chpalmer Well, that got me closer. I can actually get to the server from the app. But when I try to open one of the cameras to view it, I get an error that says channel unregistered, but now that is on the server software company.
                      I can't believe just fliping the rule was all it was. Thanks a million!!!!!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • chpalmerC
                        chpalmer
                        last edited by

                        Rules are always parsed first from top down. I only use 1:1 NAT in my use cases around here so don't get to play with single/multiple port forwarding to often. But my belief is that having the first rule with your multiple ports on top was causing the box to somehow take control of port 8554 for its use and blocking the redirect rule.

                        Another way would be to make three port forwards and corresponding rules. 8000-8553 554/8554 8555-9000.

                        Im betting you actually do not need all those ports forwarded but until you get everything working you probably wont be able to trim them down to what is needed. Unless you can see it in the various cameras.. if more than one. My guess is one port per camera?

                        Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                        Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • GrimetonG
                          Grimeton
                          last edited by

                          Are you testing from INSIDE the same network where the cameras are running?

                          If so, enable the NAT-reflection option that does NAT + PROXY.

                          I explained NAT-reflection in a different context here:

                          https://forum.netgate.com/topic/139457/transparently-intercept-and-redirect-dns-traffic-to-an-internal-dns/14

                          Cu

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.