Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    ipv6 broken: radvd: can't join ipv6-allrouters on <interface>

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.5 Development Snapshots (Retired)
    144 Posts 15 Posters 60.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • w0wW
      w0w
      last edited by

      https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/9577 is updated, but nothing new so far, waiting for the new build based on 12.1

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • w0wW
        w0w
        last edited by

        @jimp when do we expect snapshots based on FreeBSD 12.1? Is it coming early 2020?
        Happy holidays! 😉

        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • S
          strangegopher @w0w
          last edited by

          @w0w said in ipv6 broken: radvd: can't join ipv6-allrouters on <interface>:

          @jimp when do we expect snapshots based on FreeBSD 12.1? Is it coming early 2020?
          Happy holidays! 😉

          im sure upgrading to 12.1 will break other things and require more testing. But I hope this issue will be fixed.

          ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            A Former User @strangegopher
            last edited by

            @strangegopher said in ipv6 broken: radvd: can't join ipv6-allrouters on <interface>:

            im sure upgrading to 12.1 will break other things and require more testing. But I hope this issue will be fixed.

            I’m reasonably current with 12.1 and haven’t noticed any new issues and a few other issues have been fixed. Most of the 2.50 pfsense commits to 12.0 apply to 12.1 without conflicts.

            S w0wW 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • S
              strangegopher @A Former User
              last edited by

              @rschell thats great news! thanks for all the work. Happy holidays!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • w0wW
                w0w @A Former User
                last edited by

                @rschell
                Ronald, any chances to get already compiled radvd with patch provided on https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/9577? Just for testing.

                ? 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User @w0w
                  last edited by

                  @w0w I can give it a try. I’ll have to update my 2.5 version first, it’s been a while.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • ?
                    A Former User @w0w
                    last edited by A Former User

                    @w0w said in ipv6 broken: radvd: can't join ipv6-allrouters on <interface>:

                    @rschell
                    Ronald, any chances to get already compiled radvd with patch provided on https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/9577? Just for testing.

                    I think I got a RADVD version based on 2.5 now. My build machine is based on stable-12 and there was a linker change that required changing one of the linker options (added -z notext).

                    The test version is based on the 2.5 source changing the behavior of setup_allrouters_membership routine in the RADVD port. From the code listed in 9577, I changed the dimension of the msockets table from 10 to 50 and added a logging message when a socket has been added to the table and also expanded the "can't join" message to include additional information should the IPV6_JOIN_GROUP call fail. Normal operation should log the following messages in the Routing log, one for each interface configured:

                    Feb 11 08:28:18 	radvd 	78824 	version 2.18 started
                    Feb 11 08:28:18 	radvd 	78834 	adding ipv6-allrouters on em0, sock: 4, iface->props.if_index:1
                    

                    I have the txz file ready and have posted it to the redmine issue #9577 for those who wish to test the alternate patch.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                    • w0wW
                      w0w
                      last edited by

                      Thanks, testing.

                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        motific @w0w
                        last edited by

                        @w0w - any results so far?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • kiokomanK
                          kiokoman LAYER 8
                          last edited by kiokoman

                          i'm start testing right now, we need at least 24 h to tell if it's ok. no prob so far :)

                          Feb 13 18:58:33 	radvd 	38033 	adding ipv6-allrouters on ix0.100, sock: 4, iface->props.if_index:12
                          Feb 13 18:58:33 	radvd 	37849 	version 2.18 started
                          

                          ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                          Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                          we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                          Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • w0wW
                            w0w
                            last edited by

                            Yes, I can confirm that IPv6 works good. About 36 hours and no problem.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • kiokomanK
                              kiokoman LAYER 8
                              last edited by

                              after all this days it's still working good
                              great job @rschell

                              ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                              Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                              we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                              Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • kiokomanK
                                kiokoman LAYER 8
                                last edited by

                                @rschell idk if it's related to this update but lately i had trouble with my ipv6 tunnel, i still need to investigate but the problem is that my tunnel does not work after a reboot
                                the gif is up but gateway monitor say packet loss 100%
                                i had to reboot 2 / 3 times in a row to make it work again

                                ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                                Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                                we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                                Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User @kiokoman
                                  last edited by

                                  @kiokoman Unlikely related to the proposed patch. I'm using an 6RD stf interface and have noticed issues with loss of the WAN connection. Might be a timing issue with the gif interface, not certain.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • kiokomanK
                                    kiokoman LAYER 8
                                    last edited by

                                    some kind of race condition at boot maybe, also if i wait some hours the tunnel start to work alone. but it's faster if i reboot until it start working. idk the problem started last week just after i moved pfsense from bare metal to esxi, probably something to do with that

                                    ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                                    Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                                    we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                                    Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                                    ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ?
                                      A Former User @kiokoman
                                      last edited by

                                      @kiokoman I've noticed that bare metal vs Hyper V behave differently in subtle ways.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • kiokomanK
                                        kiokoman LAYER 8
                                        last edited by kiokoman

                                        ok i think that i found what's going on, if i disable openvpn before restarting pfsense the tunnel work.
                                        so i have to disable openvpn, restart pfsense, and when it's up i can start the openvpn otherwise i have trouble

                                        ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                                        Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                                        we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                                        Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • w0wW
                                          w0w
                                          last edited by w0w

                                          Looks like there are no error messages on the latest STABLE snapshots.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • kiokomanK
                                            kiokoman LAYER 8
                                            last edited by kiokoman

                                            do we no longer have to apply that patch manually?
                                            I have not yet had time to update and verify

                                            ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                                            Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                                            we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                                            Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                                            w0wW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.