Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    ipv6 broken: radvd: can't join ipv6-allrouters on <interface>

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.5 Development Snapshots (Retired)
    144 Posts 15 Posters 60.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • w0wW
      w0w
      last edited by

      @jimp when do we expect snapshots based on FreeBSD 12.1? Is it coming early 2020?
      Happy holidays! 😉

      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • S
        strangegopher @w0w
        last edited by

        @w0w said in ipv6 broken: radvd: can't join ipv6-allrouters on <interface>:

        @jimp when do we expect snapshots based on FreeBSD 12.1? Is it coming early 2020?
        Happy holidays! 😉

        im sure upgrading to 12.1 will break other things and require more testing. But I hope this issue will be fixed.

        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User @strangegopher
          last edited by

          @strangegopher said in ipv6 broken: radvd: can't join ipv6-allrouters on <interface>:

          im sure upgrading to 12.1 will break other things and require more testing. But I hope this issue will be fixed.

          I’m reasonably current with 12.1 and haven’t noticed any new issues and a few other issues have been fixed. Most of the 2.50 pfsense commits to 12.0 apply to 12.1 without conflicts.

          S w0wW 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • S
            strangegopher @A Former User
            last edited by

            @rschell thats great news! thanks for all the work. Happy holidays!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • w0wW
              w0w @A Former User
              last edited by

              @rschell
              Ronald, any chances to get already compiled radvd with patch provided on https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/9577? Just for testing.

              ? 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                A Former User @w0w
                last edited by

                @w0w I can give it a try. I’ll have to update my 2.5 version first, it’s been a while.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • ?
                  A Former User @w0w
                  last edited by A Former User

                  @w0w said in ipv6 broken: radvd: can't join ipv6-allrouters on <interface>:

                  @rschell
                  Ronald, any chances to get already compiled radvd with patch provided on https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/9577? Just for testing.

                  I think I got a RADVD version based on 2.5 now. My build machine is based on stable-12 and there was a linker change that required changing one of the linker options (added -z notext).

                  The test version is based on the 2.5 source changing the behavior of setup_allrouters_membership routine in the RADVD port. From the code listed in 9577, I changed the dimension of the msockets table from 10 to 50 and added a logging message when a socket has been added to the table and also expanded the "can't join" message to include additional information should the IPV6_JOIN_GROUP call fail. Normal operation should log the following messages in the Routing log, one for each interface configured:

                  Feb 11 08:28:18 	radvd 	78824 	version 2.18 started
                  Feb 11 08:28:18 	radvd 	78834 	adding ipv6-allrouters on em0, sock: 4, iface->props.if_index:1
                  

                  I have the txz file ready and have posted it to the redmine issue #9577 for those who wish to test the alternate patch.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • w0wW
                    w0w
                    last edited by

                    Thanks, testing.

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      motific @w0w
                      last edited by

                      @w0w - any results so far?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • kiokomanK
                        kiokoman LAYER 8
                        last edited by kiokoman

                        i'm start testing right now, we need at least 24 h to tell if it's ok. no prob so far :)

                        Feb 13 18:58:33 	radvd 	38033 	adding ipv6-allrouters on ix0.100, sock: 4, iface->props.if_index:12
                        Feb 13 18:58:33 	radvd 	37849 	version 2.18 started
                        

                        ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                        Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                        we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                        Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • w0wW
                          w0w
                          last edited by

                          Yes, I can confirm that IPv6 works good. About 36 hours and no problem.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • kiokomanK
                            kiokoman LAYER 8
                            last edited by

                            after all this days it's still working good
                            great job @rschell

                            ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                            Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                            we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                            Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • kiokomanK
                              kiokoman LAYER 8
                              last edited by

                              @rschell idk if it's related to this update but lately i had trouble with my ipv6 tunnel, i still need to investigate but the problem is that my tunnel does not work after a reboot
                              the gif is up but gateway monitor say packet loss 100%
                              i had to reboot 2 / 3 times in a row to make it work again

                              ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                              Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                              we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                              Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                              ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                A Former User @kiokoman
                                last edited by

                                @kiokoman Unlikely related to the proposed patch. I'm using an 6RD stf interface and have noticed issues with loss of the WAN connection. Might be a timing issue with the gif interface, not certain.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • kiokomanK
                                  kiokoman LAYER 8
                                  last edited by

                                  some kind of race condition at boot maybe, also if i wait some hours the tunnel start to work alone. but it's faster if i reboot until it start working. idk the problem started last week just after i moved pfsense from bare metal to esxi, probably something to do with that

                                  ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                                  Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                                  we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                                  Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                                  ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ?
                                    A Former User @kiokoman
                                    last edited by

                                    @kiokoman I've noticed that bare metal vs Hyper V behave differently in subtle ways.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • kiokomanK
                                      kiokoman LAYER 8
                                      last edited by kiokoman

                                      ok i think that i found what's going on, if i disable openvpn before restarting pfsense the tunnel work.
                                      so i have to disable openvpn, restart pfsense, and when it's up i can start the openvpn otherwise i have trouble

                                      ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                                      Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                                      we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                                      Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • w0wW
                                        w0w
                                        last edited by w0w

                                        Looks like there are no error messages on the latest STABLE snapshots.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • kiokomanK
                                          kiokoman LAYER 8
                                          last edited by kiokoman

                                          do we no longer have to apply that patch manually?
                                          I have not yet had time to update and verify

                                          ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                                          Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                                          we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                                          Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                                          w0wW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • w0wW
                                            w0w @kiokoman
                                            last edited by

                                            @kiokoman
                                            Wait for 24h and I tell you :)

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.