CLI installed pfsense packages not showing up in GUI

KOM

The GUI-based installer is probably adding a section in the main config. The system reconfigures itself at boot based on the config contents, which is why some manual changes you make get lost on a reboot. You might have some luck locating the config file (sorry, I don't remember what it's called or where it is, in /config maybe?) and looking for a packages section, or perhaps you might need to do a test install with the packages installed, and then diff the config to see what was added and add that you your config. It will be messy and I don't know if it would persist through firewall upgrades.

Derelict

You would want to use pfSsh.php playback installpkg package-name to install a package from the command line. There are several packages available in the repository that are command-line only.

The command pkg search pfSense-pkg should provide a list of available names. You want everything between ^pfSense-pkg- and -VersionNumber$. This should get you close:

pkg search -q pfSense-pkg | sed -e 's/^pfSense-pkg-$[a-zA-Z0-9_-]*$-[0-9,_\.]*$/\1/'

(Don't judge - it works.)

When you install a package using pkg no manipulation of the configuration file is done. Something like squid is not going to work. There is more to adding a GUI package that just running pkg. You would want to do something like pfSsh.php playback installpkg squid to install squid from the command line.

A package such as iperf3, py27-speedtest-cli, etc will never show up in the GUI.

meshuggener

Hi Derelict,

Thanks for that, I've just tried that with the following result:

pfSsh.php playback installpkg squid-3.5.27_3.txz
Installing package "squid-3.5.27_3.txz"... Failed.

And found the following in the system log:

tail /var/log/system.log
$DATE, $HOSTNAME php-cgi: pfSsh.php: The command '/usr/local/sbin/pfSense-upgrade -y -i pfSense-pkg-squid-3.5.27_3.txz' returned exit code '1', the output was 'ERROR: Unable to compare version of pfSense-repo'

I'm guessing it's not working because it's not connected to the internet? Is there still a way to build a local repo to bypass this?

Derelict

The command pkg search pfSense-pkg should provide a list of available names. You want everything between ^pfSense-pkg- and -VersionNumber$. This should get you close:

pkg search -q pfSense-pkg | sed -e 's/^pfSense-pkg-$[a-zA-Z0-9_-]*$-[0-9,_\.]*$/\1/

Installing from any repositories other than the official ones is unsupported. Not sure what's going on with that because I have never done it.

meshuggener

Here's what I get with that:

pkg search -q pfSense-pkg | sed -e 's/^pfSense-pkg-\([a-zA-Z0-9_-]*\)-[0-9,_\.]*$/\1/
pkg: Repository pfSense-core missing. 'pkg update' required
pkg: Repository pfSense-core load error: access repo file(/var/db/pkg/repo-pfSense-core.sqllite) failed: No such file or directory
pkg: https://pkg.pfsense.org/pfSense_v2_4_4_amd64-core/meta.txz: No address record
pkg: https://pkg.pfsense.org/pfSense_v2_4_4_amd64-core/packagesite.txz: No address record

So a pfsense appliance with no access to internet will be entirely unable to install packages and manage them from the GUI?

Derelict

Yes. It needs access to the repositories.

If you want to try to duplicate the online repos locally, you will need to also point pkg locally using the repo file. There is probably even more than that required. I wouldn't know what that would be.

All of the freebsd docs are here:

https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi

meshuggener

Cool I will have a look into that, thank you for your time!

jimp

The CLI method of installing packages works fine if you specify the full pfSense-pkg-<name> name. That is identical to what the GUI does, and what the playback script ends up doing as well.

Good: pkg install pfSense-pkg-squid
Bad: pkg install squid

Derelict

Ah, I though you needed to use the pfSsh.php to get bits into config.xml, etc. Thanks.

RahulGarg

@meshuggener : I am also stuck at the same point for which you have posted this question. I already tried all the solution provided here.
Can you please help me how did you come out of this problem?

Derelict

You would probably get a better response starting your own thread with a complete description of exactly what YOU are doing and seeing.