Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Can't do a basic port forward

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    20 Posts 5 Posters 1.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      Glaz0n4
      last edited by

      I'm just reading my ISP uses CGNAT by default, I'm still reading, but I wonder if that could be the issue.

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        mcury Rebel Alliance
        last edited by

        It's because somehow you have another router there, with that 121.x.x.x, in which you should configure that port forward as well.

        Could that be the ISP modem? If that is the case, have you tried to configure it in bridge mode?
        In case you can't, try to access it and setup the port forward there as well

        dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          mcury Rebel Alliance @Glaz0n4
          last edited by

          @Glaz0n4 Yes, that is the problem, CGNAT sucks

          dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G
            Glaz0n4
            last edited by

            Ah sweet, thanks :)

            Apparently you can get them to disable it.

            I wonder if it's cost cutting or something, they are actually a really good ISP.

            My 'regular' wifi/router device worked fine.

            Thanks for your help again, really appreciate the fast response.

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              mcury Rebel Alliance @Glaz0n4
              last edited by

              @Glaz0n4 You are welcome :)

              dead on arrival, nowhere to be found.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                NOCling
                last edited by

                If your ISP get you a good IPv6, you can try to build a VPN Tunnel, and then you can route your private IPv4 through it.

                Netgate 6100 & Netgate 2100

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DaddyGoD
                  DaddyGo
                  last edited by

                  @Glaz0n4
                  you mention this in your description
                  "I know using a VPN is a better way to do this, however I just want to get this working first."

                  The RDP is no longer explicitly recommended, just an example:

                  https://www.welivesecurity.com/2019/12/17/bluekeep-time-disconnect-rdp-internet/

                  Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                  (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • G
                    Glaz0n4
                    last edited by

                    Thanks for the heads up.

                    I got this working earlier today and could connect over 3389 directly. I then deleted the rule. I plan on doing this via a VPN and will set that up when I have some time. Open VPN seems a good way to do this. I'm about to start a job in security, so bought this device to learn more about networking and security. So it'll be a fun learning experiment!

                    DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DaddyGoD
                      DaddyGo @Glaz0n4
                      last edited by DaddyGo

                      @Glaz0n4

                      OpenVPN is a completely good choice.
                      https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/vpn/openvpn/openvpn-remote-access-server.html
                      https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/vpn/openvpn/using-the-openvpn-client-export-package.html

                      in the meantime, these can also be good temporarily:
                      https://www.teamviewer.com/ -free version
                      https://anydesk.com/en -free version

                      @Glaz0n4
                      So it'll be a fun learning experiment! ✋

                      Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                      (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        serbus
                        last edited by

                        Hello!

                        I have similar problems with CGNAT at a couple of sites, but am able to get by with them running the client side of a site to site openvpn connection. This might not always be possible, so I was looking for other solutions.

                        I noticed that pfsense has a tinc package. It might be worthwhile looking into that and a MITM VPS as a way to address the CGNAT and secure remote admin issues.

                        Something like this :

                        https://ideaman924.com/2020/02/10/using-tinc-to-get-around-double-nat/

                        John

                        Lex parsimoniae

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • G
                          Glaz0n4
                          last edited by

                          I was able to be removed from cgnat at no cost, so went that way :)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.