Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Hardware for 10Gb/s

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    8 Posts 5 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      prx
      last edited by

      Hi,

      I wolud like to know if the following server is good for a 10 Gb/s connection:

      Server: AS -1114S-WTRT
      CPU: AMD Rome 7272 DP/UP 12C/24T 2.9G 64M
      RAM: 64 GB DDR4-3200 2Rx8 ECC REG DIMM
      SSD: Seagate Haden 240GB SATA 6Gb/s, 2.5", 7mm 3DWPD SSD in RAID 1 (zfs)
      NIC 1: Chelsio T540-LP-CR 4 x 10Gb SFP+
      NIC 2: Chelsio T540-LP-CR 4 x 10Gb SFP+

      consider that I have to use PfblokerNG dev and nat

      thank you

      DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DaddyGoD
        DaddyGo @prx
        last edited by

        @prx said in Hardware for 10Gb/s:

        hi,

        You put together a pretty hard "iron" for this task. 😉

        What can I say(?):
        -we also use AMD Epyc series CPUs in pfSense devices, without any problems
        -I recommend using good quality RAM modules like Hynix, Micron, etc.
        -ZFS RAID1 is a good choice for high availability
        (I know this SSD too, more than perfect for the task)
        -the soul of the firewall is the NIC(s), your choice is supported:
        https://www.freebsd.org/releases/11.3R/hardware.html#ethernet

        I would like to ask if it is intended for a home or production environment?

        6d8bcd0c-b19d-4d61-986b-0615ec207907-image.png

        Cats bury it so they can't see it!
        (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          prx
          last edited by

          Hi,

          it is for a production site, in a HA configuration. It will be our main firewall and, as I said in my previous post, I need to use pfBlockerNG_dev and nat some networks. We will use it also as router.

          The hardware is ok for 10Gb/s connectivity?

          DaddyGoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DaddyGoD
            DaddyGo @prx
            last edited by DaddyGo

            @prx

            Hi,
            In my view, yes!

            but we seek the advice of the Netgate hardware expert who is @stephenw10
            (he will see this question and he will answer)

            it can help you in every way to keep your investment safe

            since the system is 10Gig and serves high security purposes, this is the safest next step

            ++++edit:
            these things ("pfBlockerNG_dev and nat some networks"), if these things are configured well, easily performs with this hardware configuration

            Cats bury it so they can't see it!
            (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Unfortunately I have zero experience with any recent AMD CPUs of reasonable speed.

              I can tell you you need something fast to get 10Gbps and I would still choose fewer cores at a higher speed given the choice.

              I would also choose Intel ixl NICs at this point over Chelsio. Certainly if you're able to run 2.5 snapshots to get more recent drivers.

              It may be better to wait for feedback from someone who actually has proven hardware for this.

              Steve

              T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T
                tman222 @stephenw10
                last edited by

                @stephenw10 said in Hardware for 10Gb/s:

                Unfortunately I have zero experience with any recent AMD CPUs of reasonable speed.

                I can tell you you need something fast to get 10Gbps and I would still choose fewer cores at a higher speed given the choice.

                I would also choose Intel ixl NICs at this point over Chelsio. Certainly if you're able to run 2.5 snapshots to get more recent drivers.

                It may be better to wait for feedback from someone who actually has proven hardware for this.

                Steve

                Hi @stephenw10 - any particular reason you are recommending the Intel ixl over Chelsio? I have been using a pair of T540's for some time now (one of them in pfSense actually) and they have been real work horses - never gave me any trouble. Thanks in advance.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  If you have the Chelsios then use them. The newer Intel chips run a lot less power for the same job (in pfSense), cooling is less of a concern.

                  At one point the Chelsio cards were the only thing we found that ran stable with good throughput in FreeBSD/pfSense. But that was a long while ago now.

                  Steve

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • aponomarenkoA
                    aponomarenko
                    last edited by

                    We have a review of similar AS -1014S-WTRT in the FreeBSD hardware database.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.