• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Multi-WAN, LTE Gateway problems

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
8 Posts 3 Posters 598 Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B
    brucehowells
    last edited by Jul 24, 2020, 3:44 PM

    I recently adopted an LTE Gateway, which can't be switched into bridged mode (not sure if that's relevant for LTE, anyway, but...) and I've spent more time than I care to admit trying to get Multi-WAN to work with it.

    I have two WAN interfaces defined - WAN, which goes to Comcast and gets a public IPv4 address, and WWAN which goes to the LTE, getting a NAT IP - at the moment, I have it set to 172.16.0.0/24. My LAN is in 10.0.0.0/23.

    Creating the gateway group works well, but I can not seem to get failover or policy-based routing to work.

    Has someone written up a setup guide for this kind of scenario?

    D 1 Reply Last reply Jul 26, 2020, 1:36 PM Reply Quote 0
    • R
      Rico LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance
      last edited by Jul 24, 2020, 4:07 PM

      Double NAT is not ideal but just works, I do this a lot with LTE too.
      Show your settings via Screenshot.

      -Rico

      B 1 Reply Last reply Jul 24, 2020, 4:15 PM Reply Quote 0
      • B
        brucehowells @Rico
        last edited by Jul 24, 2020, 4:15 PM

        @Rico It'll be later today. Just didn't want to gunk up the forum with a bunch of screenshots if the answer was "oh, yea, just go to this page in the pfSense book, you ninny." :)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          Rico LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance
          last edited by Rico Jul 24, 2020, 5:45 PM Jul 24, 2020, 5:42 PM

          Oh well here we go. ;-)
          https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/routing/connectivity-troubleshooting.html
          https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/routing/troubleshooting-multi-wan.html

          -Rico

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            DaddyGo @brucehowells
            last edited by Jul 26, 2020, 1:36 PM

            @brucehowells said in Multi-WAN, LTE Gateway problems:

            reating the gateway group works well, but I can not seem to get failover or policy-based routing to work.

            we had problems with this for a long time and so we solved it....

            1. Special SIM card from the service provider (industrial non - NATd)
            2. Huawei B2338-168 4G LTE modem / router in IP pass mode

            https://www.4gltemall.com/blog/huawei-b2338-outdoor-lte-cpe/

            9f10435a-7947-489a-a88c-9167a45f9cd5-image.png

            WWAN on pfSense works perfectly after replacements 😉

            Cats bury it so they can't see it!
            (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

            B 1 Reply Last reply Jul 26, 2020, 1:38 PM Reply Quote 0
            • B
              brucehowells @DaddyGo
              last edited by Jul 26, 2020, 1:38 PM

              @DaddyGo Well, yea, but... :)

              D 1 Reply Last reply Jul 26, 2020, 1:44 PM Reply Quote 0
              • D
                DaddyGo @brucehowells
                last edited by DaddyGo Jul 26, 2020, 1:47 PM Jul 26, 2020, 1:44 PM

                @brucehowells

                dual-NAT on the secondary WAN connection is just a headache
                does not work properly the VOIP (SIP), icecast stream, reverse proxy, etc

                can I list more? 🖐

                +++edit:
                https://www.verizon.com/support/knowledge-base-213106/
                https://community.sophos.com/products/xg-firewall/f/hardware/94546/lte-modem-with-passthrough-of-external-ip-address
                https://www.netgear.com/images/datasheet/mobile/LB1120.pdf

                Cats bury it so they can't see it!
                (You know what I mean if you have a cat)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  brucehowells
                  last edited by Aug 20, 2020, 6:57 PM

                  I think I identified my problem, and figured I'd share with the community if anyone ever sees this breadcrumb again.

                  I was trying to use a gateway group so that I had fallback for PBR - "prefer WWAN, use WAN if you must" and that didn't quite seem to be working as expected; I'd get SYN-SENT on WWAN and active state on WAN.

                  Once I changed the PBR rule to use the gateway and not the gateway group (and, of course, tossed the states on WAN), traffic started flowing as desired.

                  Fun, fun, fun.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                    This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                    consent.not_received