J1900 vs J3160 4x LAN fanless
-
I am using quite happily using the Qotom J1900 4x LAN headless, but it doesn't support AES.
Anyone have any experience with the J3610 4x LAN headless.
Supports AES, but does it really make that much of a difference for a small home network. with a few media boxes and PCs?
-
You mean the J3160?
Are you using a VPN?
What's your WAN speed?
Steve
-
@stephenw10 said in J1900 vs J3610 4x LAN fanless:
You mean the J3160?
Are you using a VPN?
What's your WAN speed?
Steve
- yes - J3160
- yes (get about 100Mg)
- 120Mg
-
You'd be unlikely to see any difference then. The J1900 is probably not pegged at 100% anywhere with that load.
You can try runningtop -aSH
at the command and line whilst pulling traffic over the VPN to be sure though.Steve
-
@stephenw10 said in J1900 vs J3160 4x LAN fanless:
top -aSH
If i read that correctly, the system is basically doing nothing.
last pid: 12442; load averages: 0.19, 0.70, 0.87 up 4+01:13:09 23:00:42 591 processes: 5 running, 552 sleeping, 34 waiting Mem: 487M Active, 1462M Inact, 2149M Wired, 151M Buf, 3696M Free ARC: 327M Total, 169M MFU, 151M MRU, 32K Anon, 1283K Header, 6573K Other 104M Compressed, 323M Uncompressed, 3.11:1 Ratio Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 11 root 155 ki31 0K 64K CPU0 0 92.1H 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu0}] 11 root 155 ki31 0K 64K CPU1 1 89.7H 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu1}] 11 root 155 ki31 0K 64K RUN 2 89.5H 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu2}] 11 root 155 ki31 0K 64K CPU3 3 85.8H 100.00% [idle{idle: cpu3}] 67885 root 23 0 101M 45684K piperd 0 1:06 2.78% php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm){php-fpm} 23242 unbound 20 0 163M 120M kqread 2 0:23 0.10% /usr/local/sbin/unbound -c /var/unbound/unbound.conf{unbound} 49127 root 20 0 10308K 6524K select 2 84:54 0.00% /usr/local/sbin/openvpn --config /var/etc/openvpn/client3.conf 74692 root 40 20 801M 724M bpf 1 39:10 0.00% /usr/local/bin/snort -R 22706 -D -q --suppress-config-log -l /var/log/snort/snort_igb022706 --pid-path /var/run --nolock-pidfil 12 root -92 - 0K 544K WAIT 0 20:51 0.00% [intr{irq259: igb0:que 0}] 12 root -92 - 0K 544K WAIT 0 11:44 0.00% [intr{irq267: igb2:que 0}] 12 root -92 - 0K 544K WAIT 1 10:31 0.00% [intr{irq268: igb2:que 1}] 75459 root 40 20 544M 466M bpf 2 9:44 0.00% /usr/local/bin/snort -R 14813 -D -q --suppress-config-log -l /var/log/snort/snort_ovpnc314813 --pid-path /var/run --nolock-pidf 12 root -60 - 0K 544K WAIT 1 7:08 0.00% [intr{swi4: clock (0)}] 21 root -16 - 0K 16K pftm 3 6:03 0.00% [pf purge] 12 root -92 - 0K 544K WAIT 1 5:39 0.00% [intr{irq260: igb0:que 1}] 12 root -92 - 0K 544K WAIT 3 4:26 0.00% [intr{irq272: igb3:que 1}] 12 root -92 - 0K 544K WAIT 2 3:37 0.00% [intr{irq271: igb3:que 0}] 74232 root 20 0 55976K 38704K nanslp 0 3:16 0.00% /usr/local/bin/php -f /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc dnsbl
-
Yeah, that shows it doing nothing at all so you can;t be moving any traffic over the OpenVPN at that point. OpenVPN is single threaded so what you're looking for is if one of the idle processes goes to 0 (or very close to it). In that case it is CPU limited and something else may get you better VPN performance.
Also if you let top run a few seconds it will show you the CPU usage by type line at the top.Steve