• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

DNS Resolver - only on 443 > DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
dnsdns forwardervpnnetflix
10 Posts 4 Posters 1.5k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C
    charles_moody
    last edited by Oct 16, 2020, 10:44 AM

    Hey guys,

    I resetted my entire network and started from scratch with basic settings. I hope someone can point me in the right direction.

    I got basically all services running I need BUT with one exception: Most of my vlans are leaving the network trough a VPN (expressvpn), IoT and Smart Devices have no problems with netflix, but when trying to reach netflix.com on a browser I get DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN > EVEN on devices which are not on the VPN vlans.

    Where did I miss?

    -NO VPN > LAN + VL10_MGMT
    -VPN > VL30_VGSH + VL50_VGNET

    netgate-01.PNG

    netgate-02.PNG

    netgate-03.PNG

    netgate-04.PNG

    netgate-05.PNG

    netgate-06.PNG

    netgate-07.PNG

    netgate-08.PNG
    Unbound enabled / dnsmasq disabled
    netgate-09.PNG

    netgate-10.PNG

    netgate-11.PNG

    Have a great day!

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • K
      kiokoman LAYER 8
      last edited by Oct 18, 2020, 11:12 AM

      i can tell you that you don't need dnssec
      and you are not forwarding dns request
      maybe try with DNS Query Forwarding enabled
      I don't notice anything wrong with your screenshots but perhaps the error escapes me

      ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
      Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
      we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
      Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by johnpoz Oct 18, 2020, 12:12 PM Oct 18, 2020, 12:08 PM

        @kiokoman said in DNS Resolver - only on 443 > DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN:

        i can tell you that you don't need dnssec

        Why is that, he is not forwarding in unbound - so he would prob want dnssec.. Only if he is forwarding would he not want dnssec checked.

        Maybe I need more coffee.. But Im a bit confused on what your wanting to accomplish for clients.. So you want to route them out the vpn.. But what do you want them to use for dns?

        Looks like you have your resolver trying to resolve, not forward.. And have clients be able to use dot to unbound, but then unbound would just resolve out using this 1 vpn connection?

        But your not allowing the devices to talk to unbound on 853 per your rules, you forcing all traffic out gateway?

        You understand browsers these days also like to turn on doh by default, maybe your browser is trying to use doh, which you are routing through a vpn, and that might be blocked by the vpn?

        Maybe vpn providers tell you to only use their NSers - or your "leaking" ;)

        I really do not understand the use of dot or doh locally? Who are you trying to hide dns queries from on your local network? Yourself?

        What exactly are you wanting to happen? What do you want the clients to use for dns? Where do you want pfsense to resolve? Understanding that anything put in general is possible for pfsense to use for its own internal resolving, and it would not use dot or doh to talk to these servers.

        There is a redmine out to be able to adjust this behavior going forward.
        https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/10931

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        C 1 Reply Last reply Oct 21, 2020, 1:00 PM Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kiokoman LAYER 8
          last edited by Oct 18, 2020, 12:12 PM

          that's what confused me, if he does not want to forward why setting dns in general setup with gateway specified?
          or I am the one that need more coffee

          ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
          Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
          we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
          Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by Oct 18, 2020, 12:13 PM

            Yeah - not exactly sure what his end goal here is?? Its a bit of hodge podge of settings, or maybe I just need a few more cups ;)

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              charles_moody
              last edited by Oct 18, 2020, 7:06 PM

              Please grab a drink and spend some time with a fool.

              I had it all in openwrt, the vlans as regular internal networks/lan and clients going out the vpn.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                last edited by Oct 18, 2020, 11:09 PM

                Last time I Played with open or ddwrt was a really long time ago, but I do not believe it ran resolve - it ran forwarder.

                If you want some outside dns to be used, then either point all your clients to those directly, or setup unbound to forward. In your current screenshots your resolving.. So those entries in general don't have anything to do with your clients that ask pfsense (unbound) for dns.

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  charles_moody @johnpoz
                  last edited by Oct 21, 2020, 1:00 PM

                  @johnpoz said in DNS Resolver - only on 443 > DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN:

                  Maybe vpn providers tell you to only use their NSers - or your "leaking" ;)

                  In another thread here in the forum I read that those DNS-servers are neccessary for Netflix to load everything as usual using a VPN inbetween

                  or setup unbound to forward

                  Disabled DNSSEC and setup unbound to forward, I'm now able to reach netflix.com via https, thanks

                  unbound.PNG

                  But your not allowing the devices to talk to unbound on 853 per your rules, you forcing all traffic out gateway?

                  Could you please elaborate on this? I really don't want anything exposed to the world

                  Kind regards
                  Max

                  G 1 Reply Last reply Oct 21, 2020, 1:13 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • G
                    Gertjan @charles_moody
                    last edited by Oct 21, 2020, 1:13 PM

                    @charles_moody said in DNS Resolver - only on 443 > DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN:

                    elaborate

                    Here : https://forum.netgate.com/topic/139771/setup-dns-over-tls-on-pfsense-2-4-4-p2-guide/66?_=1603282378283

                    No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                    Edit : and where are the logs ??

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                      last edited by johnpoz Oct 21, 2020, 1:17 PM Oct 21, 2020, 1:14 PM

                      Your rules force all traffic out the gateway.

                      rules.png

                      And the rules below that make no sense, because rules are evaluated top down, first rule to trigger wins, no other rules are evaluated.

                      So your rule sending traffic out your gateway is any any.. When would there be traffic that does trigger that rules.

                      When would there be traffic to ! private, that does not match the rule above it any any?

                      If you want your clients to talk to pfsense IP.. Where do you allow that? You block talking to pfsense on 443, then your next rule says go out the vpn.. How does vpn have access to pfsense vlan30 interface for example?

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      9 out of 10
                      • First post
                        9/10
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                        This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                        consent.not_received