Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Limit bandwidth per user or Share bandwidth evenly?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
    21 Posts 6 Posters 5.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      anand_phulwani @Jimbohello
      last edited by

      @Jimbohello I should have been bit clear, i have 3 connections

      • 100MBPS
      • 40MBPS
      • 8MBPS.

      My gateway groups are

      • 100MBPS_40MBPS_8MBPS
      • 100MBPS_8MBPS_40MBPS
      • 40MBPS_100MBPS_8MBPS

      In Floating rules, i am just trying to match the IN direction first
      Action: Match
      Interface: Lan
      Direction: In
      Address Family: IPv4
      Protocol: Any
      Source: LAN Net
      Destination: (Inverse/Not) LAN Net
      Gateway: 100MBPS_40MBPS_8MBPS
      In pipe: Upload_100MBPS_Queue
      Out pipe: Download_100MBPS_Queue

      Similar floating rule for 40MBPS_100MBPS_8MBPS with the following changes only
      Gateway: 40MBPS_100MBPS_8MBPS
      In pipe: Upload_40MBPS_Queue
      Out pipe: Download_40MBPS_Queue

      Now i have two questions

      • Is the floating rule above defined correctly?
      • I have read somewhere that for IN/OUT direction we should give IN/OUT queues separately, but defining just an OUT queue for an OUT direction floating rule gives this error "A queue must be selected for the In direction before selecting one for Out too."
      • When we have a gateway group with different speeds of each WAN, how can we define fixed pipes.

      Thanks for your help.
      Anand

      J 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        Jimbohello @anand_phulwani
        last edited by

        @anand_phulwani
        did you follw this simple tutorial

        https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/3e67dk/flexible_vs_fixed_limiters_troubleshooting_with/?utm_source=amp&utm_medium=&utm_content=post_body

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          Jimbohello @anand_phulwani
          last edited by

          @anand_phulwani

          are you using em driver ??

          create file
          /boot/loader.conf.local - final - best result ever !
          if_em_load="YES"
          cc_htcp_load="YES"
          hw.em.eee_setting="0"
          hw.em.rx_process_limit="-1"
          hw.em.txd="2048"
          hw.em.rxd="2048"
          net.link.ifqmaxlen="4096"

          the create like my setup

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            Jimbohello @anand_phulwani
            last edited by

            @anand_phulwani

            like my setup

            limiter config Download
            Codel
            FQ_codel
            queue lenght 100
            ecn enable

            limiter Queue Download
            Mask / Destination Adresse /32
            Codel

            limiter config Upload
            Codel
            FQ_codel
            queue lenght 100
            ecn enable

            limiter Queue Upload
            Mask / Source Adresse /32
            Codel

            limiter on lan rules
            in= upload-queue
            out=download-queue

            if you wan't floating just make the same in floating instead of lan rules but you will have to set the direction to out

            that's the best i can do

            floating-1.png change black spot with Lan Net
            floating-2.png change black spot with Desired Gateway

            floating-2.png floating-1.png

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              anand_phulwani
              last edited by

              @Jimbohello
              I have made the following for sharing bandwidth evenly

              • Upload Limiter
                01. Upload Limiter.jpg
              • Upload Queue
                02. Upload Queue.jpg
              • Download Limiter
                03. Download Limiter.jpg
              • Download Queue
                04. Download Queue.jpg
              • Floating Rule
                05. Floating Rule.jpg

              but it still isn't working, i am using the traffic graphs / online web speedcheck to check for equal division, but it isn't happening.

              Thanks again for so much help, you are the first person on the forum who is at least willing to discuss over it.

              Thanks again,
              Anand

              J D 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                Jimbohello @anand_phulwani
                last edited by

                @anand_phulwani
                replace the scheduler for fd_codel instead of worst-case

                everything else seem perfecto

                but this is for a max limit and not a per/user scenario.

                you probably have to reset all state or reboot

                if is still not working

                try in lan first not floating

                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  Jimbohello @anand_phulwani
                  last edited by

                  @anand_phulwani
                  as i understand this is a flexible limit base on per/user/max-limit-all
                  so if 6 pc download silmutanous pfsense should divise the max of 100M for these 6 pc

                  if your looking to get a fix limit/per/user
                  you should check out de tuturial 1er scenario 'FIXED limit'

                  ciao

                  BUT i MAY be Wrong ! ain't god ! :)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    anand_phulwani
                    last edited by

                    @Jimbohello said in Limit bandwidth per user or Share bandwidth evenly?:

                    so if 6 pc download silmutanous pfsense should divise the max of 100M for these 6 pc

                    This is exactly what i am looking for 100M divided equally between active clients.

                    replace the scheduler for fd_codel instead of worst-case

                    Done

                    you probably have to reset all state or reboot

                    I always reboot first to check.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      anand_phulwani @Jimbohello
                      last edited by

                      @Jimbohello
                      I changed it to FQ_Codel, there wasn't any option of FD_Codel.

                      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        Jimbohello @anand_phulwani
                        last edited by

                        @anand_phulwani

                        sorry my mistake

                        now

                        im’ not sure if division would be equal. this will only allow a saruration to 100m and reduce bandwich to other pc if a added pc come into games. etc

                        you can see if limiter work in limiter info or staus

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          durianbusuk @anand_phulwani
                          last edited by durianbusuk

                          @anand_phulwani as your floating rule is direction is 'out', you need to swap your in/out pipes. Place download to the left.

                          The left slot is always in the same direction as the floating rule direction. In this case, 'out' to the LAN means traffic from the firewall to your LAN devices (download).

                          Also, use tail drop for your queues; if you check the limiter info you will find that codel doesn't work if you have codel on both queue management and limiter, i.e. it's empty.

                          Turn off ECN and leave the queue length at default/empty.

                          From my experience bandwidth needs to be about 90% of speed test results before the even distribution will work.

                          Lastly, FQ-Codel doesn't distribute bandwidth evenly so stick to WF2Q+. To prove this, start a torrent or a steam download on 1 computer and do a speed test on another. If it works correctly you'll get roughly even bandwidth. FQ_Codel in this scenario, in a 40MBps connection, will have 2-3MBps to the speedtest and the rest to the torrent.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.