Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Official Realtek Driver Binary 1.95 For 2.4.4 Release

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    194 Posts 52 Posters 117.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Does it link at 2.5Gbps? Can we see the ifconfig output?

      What hardware are you using it in?

      Steve

      N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N
        nitewolfgtr @stephenw10
        last edited by nitewolfgtr

        @stephenw10
        It does link at 2.5Gbps and my hardware is HP 290-p0043w w/ Celeron G4900 and 4GB of RAM.

        I have Trendnet 2.5G network adapter installed in the PCIe x1 slot.

        Here's the ifconfig output. The 2.5Gbps NIC is re1. When I set my WAN interface back to igb0, I get 950Mbps down on speedtest. I just ran another test on re1 and I'm getting 615Mbps down.

        igb0: flags=8c02<BROADCAST,OACTIVE,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            options=6403bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dc
            hwaddr ac:16:2d:95:08:dc
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: no carrier
        igb1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            options=500b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO>
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            hwaddr ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
            status: active
        igb2: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            options=500b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO>
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            hwaddr ac:16:2d:95:08:de
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
            status: active
        igb3: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            options=500b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO>
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            hwaddr ac:16:2d:95:08:df
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
            status: active
        re0: flags=8803<UP,BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            options=2018<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,WOL_MAGIC>
            ether c4:65:16:30:2b:67
            hwaddr c4:65:16:30:2b:67
            inet 172.16.2.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.2.255
            inet6 fe80::1:1%re0 prefixlen 64 tentative scopeid 0x5
            inet6 2601:2c2:780:6919:c665:16ff:fe30:2b67 prefixlen 64 tentative
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: no carrier
        re1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            options=2018<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,WOL_MAGIC>
            ether 3c:8c:f8:f9:7b:30
            hwaddr 3c:8c:f8:f9:7b:30
            inet6 fe80::3e8c:f8ff:fef9:7b30%re1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6
            inet6 2001:558:6022:76:cc0e:e073:c4d8:89b7 prefixlen 128
            inet <REDACTED> netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 255.255.255.255
            nd6 options=23<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect (2500Base-T <full-duplex>)
            status: active
        enc0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1536
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            groups: enc
        lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
            options=680003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,LINKSTATE,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
            inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
            inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8
            inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            groups: lo
        pflog0: flags=100<PROMISC> metric 0 mtu 33160
            groups: pflog
        pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1500
            groups: pfsync
        lagg0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            options=500b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO>
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            inet 172.16.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.1.255
            inet6 fe80::1:1%lagg0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xb
            inet6 2601:2c2:780:6910:ae16:2dff:fe95:8dd prefixlen 64
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: active
            groups: lagg
            laggproto lacp lagghash l2,l3,l4
            laggport: igb1 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
            laggport: igb2 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
            laggport: igb3 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
        lagg0.20: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            inet 172.16.20.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.20.255
            inet6 fe80::1:1%lagg0.20 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xc
            inet6 2601:2c2:780:6912:ae16:2dff:fe95:8dd prefixlen 64
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: active
            vlan: 20 vlanpcp: 4 parent interface: lagg0
            groups: vlan
        lagg0.30: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            inet 172.16.30.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.30.255
            inet6 fe80::1:1%lagg0.30 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd
            inet6 2601:2c2:780:6913:ae16:2dff:fe95:8dd prefixlen 64
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: active
            vlan: 30 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: lagg0
            groups: vlan
        lagg0.40: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            inet 172.16.40.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.40.255
            inet6 fe80::1:1%lagg0.40 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xe
            inet6 2601:2c2:780:6914:ae16:2dff:fe95:8dd prefixlen 64
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: active
            vlan: 40 vlanpcp: 2 parent interface: lagg0
            groups: vlan
        lagg0.50: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            inet 172.16.50.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.50.255
            inet6 fe80::1:1%lagg0.50 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xf
            inet6 2601:2c2:780:6915:ae16:2dff:fe95:8dd prefixlen 64
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: active
            vlan: 50 vlanpcp: 4 parent interface: lagg0
            groups: vlan
        lagg0.60: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            inet 172.16.60.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.60.255
            inet6 fe80::1:1%lagg0.60 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x10
            inet6 2601:2c2:780:6916:ae16:2dff:fe95:8dd prefixlen 64
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: active
            vlan: 60 vlanpcp: 1 parent interface: lagg0
            groups: vlan
        lagg0.70: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            inet 172.16.70.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.70.255
            inet6 fe80::1:1%lagg0.70 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x11
            inet6 2601:2c2:780:6917:ae16:2dff:fe95:8dd prefixlen 64
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: active
            vlan: 70 vlanpcp: 5 parent interface: lagg0
            groups: vlan
        lagg0.80: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            inet 172.16.80.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.80.255
            inet6 fe80::1:1%lagg0.80 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x12
            inet6 2601:2c2:780:6918:ae16:2dff:fe95:8dd prefixlen 64
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: active
            vlan: 80 vlanpcp: 1 parent interface: lagg0
            groups: vlan
        lagg0.10: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
            ether ac:16:2d:95:08:dd
            inet 172.16.10.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.10.255
            inet6 fe80::1:1%lagg0.10 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x13
            inet6 2601:2c2:780:6911:ae16:2dff:fe95:8dd prefixlen 64
            nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
            media: Ethernet autoselect
            status: active
            vlan: 10 vlanpcp: 3 parent interface: lagg0
            groups: vlan
        
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          What if you use re0? What does the CPU load look like when you're testing? top -aSH

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N
            nitewolfgtr
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 said in Official Realtek Driver Binary 1.95 For 2.4.4 Release:

            top -aSH

            re0 works great and I get the full 950Mbps during speedtest.

            CPU load for re0 is around 20-25% during speedtest, whereas re1 is around 10-15%.

            Also, does this mean anything?
            Output of pciconfig -lv for re0 shows the correct controller, but re1 is missing the device attribute.

            % pciconfig -lv re0
            
            re0@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x843f103c chip=0x816810ec rev=0x15 hdr=0x00
                    vendor     = 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.'
                    device     = 'RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller'
                    class      = network
                    subclass   = ethernet
            
            % pciconfig -lv re1
            
            re1@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x012310ec chip=0x812510ec rev=0x00 hdr=0x00
                vendor     = 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.'
                class      = network
                subclass   = ethernet
            
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              The missing description is unlikely to matter.

              I was more interested in the queue or interrupt loads on your CPU cores while testing. igb will use multiple CPU cores by default. re usually isn't but this is new hardware so....

              CPU usage between those NICs looks to be inline with the throughput at least.

              Steve

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                pedropetz19 @breakaway
                last edited by

                @breakaway Thanks, you save me!!!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  spippo @Rico
                  last edited by

                  @Rico

                  THANKS! it works (on Xigmanas 12.1)

                  Do you know if WOL works? I tried to activate it, but I wasn't been able to make it work. Not sure if it's something that I do or it's just that it's not implemented in the driver (or the board for that matters).

                  Thank you
                  Bye

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • RicoR
                    Rico LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance
                    last edited by

                    Nope sorry, I don't own any Realtek Card. 😊

                    -Rico

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Now that there is a FreeBSD package for this I would use that over a, relatively, unknown binary source:

                      pkg add https://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:11:amd64/latest/All/realtek-re-kmod-v196.04_2.txz
                      

                      That would be much easier if it was in our repo though. Let me see...

                      Steve

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11079

                        Should be in snaphots soon.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by stephenw10

                          Looks good:

                          [2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT][admin@apu.stevew.lan]/root: pkg search realtek
                          realtek-re-kmod-v196.04_2      Kernel driver for Realtek PCIe Ethernet Controllers
                          

                          So do:
                          pkg install realtek-re-kmod
                          then
                          echo 'if_re_load="YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf.local

                          Then reboot and check the boot logs for:

                          re0: <Realtek PCIe GbE Family Controller> port 0x1000-0x10ff mem 0xf7a00000-0xf7a00fff,0xf7900000-0xf7903fff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1
                          re0: Using Memory Mapping!
                          re0: Using 1 MSI-X message
                          re0: ASPM disabled
                          re0: version:1.96.04
                          re0: Ethernet address: 00:0d:b9:37:30:10
                          

                          Current version should be installed every time. It's built against our kernel source etc.

                          It's unlikely this will be backported to 2.4.5 but far easier (and probably safer) to use in 2.5 when it's released or in snapshots now.

                          Steve

                          G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                          • G
                            Griffo @stephenw10
                            last edited by Griffo

                            @stephenw10 For some reason I cannot seem to get this to load.
                            I had the previous driver loaded on 2.4.5 but have upgrade to 2.5.0-Development

                            I've followed your instructions, it appears to install OK, but I can't see it in kldstat nor does my log look like yours. Do you have any suggestions on what i might be doing wrong?

                            [2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT][root@gw.griffo.co]/boot: cat loader.conf.local
                            if_re_load="YES"
                            
                            

                            My logs

                            Dec 12 13:04:04	kernel		re0: <RealTek 8168/8111 B/C/CP/D/DP/E/F/G PCIe Gigabit Ethernet> port 0xe000-0xe0ff mem 0x81300000-0x81300fff,0xa0100000-0xa0103fff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1
                            Dec 12 13:04:04	kernel		re0: Using 1 MSI-X message
                            Dec 12 13:04:04	kernel		re0: Chip rev. 0x2c800000
                            Dec 12 13:04:04	kernel		re0: MAC rev. 0x00100000
                            Dec 12 13:04:04	kernel		miibus0: <MII bus> on re0
                            
                            [2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT][root@gw.griffo.co]/boot: kldstat
                            Id Refs Address                Size Name
                             1   25 0xffffffff80200000  3ae7ee0 kernel
                             2    1 0xffffffff846fa000     1000 cpuctl.ko
                             3    1 0xffffffff846fb000     8c90 aesni.ko
                             4    1 0xffffffff84704000     37f8 cryptodev.ko
                             5    1 0xffffffff84708000      b28 coretemp.ko
                             6    1 0xffffffff84709000    26fe8 ipfw.ko
                             7    1 0xffffffff84730000    10e18 dummynet.ko
                            
                            [2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT][root@gw.griffo.co]/boot: pkg info | grep realtek
                            realtek-re-kmod-v196.04_2      Kernel driver for Realtek PCIe Ethernet Controllers
                            [2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT][root@gw.griffo.co]/boot:
                            
                            
                            [2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT][root@gw.griffo.co]/boot/modules: ls -al
                            total 1300
                            drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel      512 Dec 12 13:42 .
                            drwxr-xr-x  10 root  wheel     1536 Dec 12 13:32 ..
                            -r-xr-xr-x   1 root  wheel   106328 Nov 11 13:23 bwi_v3_ucode.ko
                            -r-xr-xr-x   1 root  wheel  1168400 Nov 20 04:51 if_re.ko
                            -rw-r--r--   1 root  wheel      148 Dec 12 13:29 linker.hints
                            [2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT][root@gw.griffo.co]/boot/modules:
                            
                            
                            G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • G
                              Griffo @Griffo
                              last edited by

                              Nevermind, I had so many other issues I've rolled back to 2.4.5 so it's probably moot.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Hmm, looks like you have everything right. You could try this additional line in loader.conf.local, though I did not need it here, the loader looks there anyway:

                                if_re_name="/boot/modules/if_re.ko"
                                

                                Steve

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • N
                                  NetworkingMicrobe
                                  last edited by NetworkingMicrobe

                                  Hi all,

                                  New to the pfSense world but wanted to follow up on this discussion. I've successfully compiled & installed the latest if_re.ko drivers from Realtek, v1.96.04, for my RTL8111/8168/8411 Gigabit ethernet controller (re0 interface). They are loaded upon boot without issue, as per kldstat and looking at logs in the web UI (Status > System Logs > System > General).
                                  This is an integrated controller on my motherboard (old P7H55-M PRO from Asus) which I'm testing for use as WAN in a homelab setup while I wait for my Intel NICs for LAN. The link is also recognized as 1Gbps as per ifconfig (1000Base-T <full-duplex>).

                                  I am facing performance issues though when benchmarking with iperf3. Using Cat5e or Cat6 cabling all around, with short runs from the firewall to my client, and have tried new cables as well.

                                  Using iperf3, when re0 is the SERVER, I get about 450Mbps. When re0 is the CLIENT, I get a big range, but about 450-600Mbps on average, sometimes peaking at 800Mbps for an entire run if I'm lucky. Retry (Retr column) is almost always all 0 or thereabouts.

                                  The same client can easily get 900+ Mbps with another iperf3 server on the network.

                                  I looked into CPU and memory usage during the tests, plenty of free memory on the system (8GB RAM on system), swap not in use at all. As for the CPU (Intel Core i3-530), usage looks something like this, with lots of idle room...

                                  CPU:  0.7% user,  0.0% nice,  8.0% system, 16.7% interrupt, 74.6% idle
                                  

                                  I was wondering if anyone faced similar performance issues, with lack of consistency seeming to occur as well (although never a steady 900Mbps+ or even 800Mbps+)? I saw that @nitewolfgtr and @stephenw10 spoke a bit about performance issues on a 2.5G card, but never came to any conclusions.

                                  Thanks!

                                  G CybermazeC J 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • G
                                    Griffo @NetworkingMicrobe
                                    last edited by

                                    @networkingmicrobe I had the same issue with my Qotom with the built in realteks. It seemed to have some magic stop around 450mbits, sometimes though it would go up to 600mbits. There appeared to be plenty of CPU left but it just maxed out. I replaced it with a new box with Intel NIC's and hit wire-speed gigabit easily.

                                    N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      @networkingmicrobe said in Official Realtek Driver Binary 1.95 For 2.4.4 Release:

                                      i3-530

                                      That's a 2 core 4 thread CPU so 74% idle could be 1 virtual core at 100%. Potentially the core running iperf.
                                      Try running top -aSH while you test.

                                      Better to test through the firewall rather than to or from it directly.

                                      Steve

                                      N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                      • N
                                        Napsterbater @stephenw10
                                        last edited by

                                        @networkingmicrobe If you want to benchmark pfSense on a particular device and setup. run iperf through pfSense not on it.

                                        It has been said MANY times on the fourms.

                                        Using iperf on the pfsense system itself is not a valid gauge at routing performance.

                                        CybermazeC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • CybermazeC
                                          Cybermaze @NetworkingMicrobe
                                          last edited by

                                          @networkingmicrobe I'm not entirely sure, but I suspect that the driver is limited in that one TCP/UDP stream can only utilize one core on the CPU, simply put, 450Mbps is what a single core on your CPU (Intel Core i3-530) can handle if you run iperf with one client thread (should be default).

                                          You can test that by running iperf on the client side with more threads using -P (that's a capital P), something like:

                                          iperf -c 192.168.0.1 -P 4
                                          

                                          Will run the client with 4 threads, each opening their own TCP stream (adjust IP address to whatever you are using).

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • CybermazeC
                                            Cybermaze @Napsterbater
                                            last edited by

                                            @napsterbater correct, it is not a valid gauge at routing performance, however I suspect that @networkingmicrobe is attempting to find out wether or not his NIC is capable of sending data close to the 1Gbit linespeed, not the actual routing throughput.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.