MS activated DoH at the operating system level, in this "great" 20H2 release...?!
-
@Tzvia said in MS activated DoH at the operating system level, in this "great" 20H2 release...?!:
dangling this 'carrot'. Eat this one, it's more secure than that one... Free.
Thanks for this mindful post, do you have your own opinion and experience?
I’m happy to give you the "image", you give it a try and talk about it...
Carrots what? cool -
Sounds to me that though it's supported, it's not enforced. What would happen to those of us using the resolver and talking to the roots?
-
@provels said in MS activated DoH at the operating system level, in this "great" 20H2 release...?!:
Sounds to me that though it's supported, it's not enforced. What would happen to those of us using the resolver and talking to the roots?
This is exactly my concern, but since I have the information from an official source, I have no doubt.
We manage nearly 800 Win OP system licenses and even more Office suite licenses.There’s direct contact at MS and it’s unbelievable, but that’s what they said on the phone.
The "mortals" will only get this "image" next year, via the system update, which will be mandatory (21H2).
This raises serious concerns.
in the meantime anything can happen, but I thought I would share this with you...
I don't know anything about the server side and AD background yet, but they will definitely have a great idea for that too.
but anyway, all my evidence for the operation of DoH is above, now I dive deeper and share it here.
I don't usually open a topic here in the forum, but I thought it was important, it is an annoying statement DoH and I am confused by it...
The fact that everyone is just talking about it, but no one dares to try this bastard "image", ergo we deny...
BTW:
what interest I would have to spread horror news, this is a concrete experience and curiosity of course -
@provels said in MS activated DoH at the operating system level, in this "great" 20H2 release...?!:
What would happen to those of us using the resolver and talking to the roots?
You have your windows machine resolving? You still point to something that is not a doh server even if you were.. You would point to loopback if you were running some resolving software on your windows machine.
I am for sure against this whole central dns nonsense - send us your dns queries, your isp is spying on you..
As no disable it.. Again to use doh have to point know the fqdn that is on the cert.. If I don't point one of the doh servers and I point to something else - how could it be using doh? If it looks up shit via doh while I specifically point to 192.168.1.1 - then yes that is the beginning of the end.. And I move to linux..
Its like the IPv6, you can not really disable it.. You can just not use it.. Even turning it "off" still leaves it enabled... That is how I think this doh support is going to work.
Guess we will see when 21H2 comes out - which isn't all that far from now..
BTW - give me a link to download it from, I will fire it up as a VM.
-
So the fear is that MS/whoever and browsers will hardcode DoH servers and they'll bypass unbound by using 443? Other than being a bit slower, what would be the harm? Most any website uses an encrypted connection anyway. ISPs can't read encrypted traffic anyway. Or am I not paranoid enough? :)
-
@provels said in MS activated DoH at the operating system level, in this "great" 20H2 release...?!:
and they'll bypass unbound
That is the concern yes.. I can filter, I can split dns when you point to my own dns. If you bypass I have to trust what that is - I can not resolve..
How do I even resolve my own local resources if your pointing to something on the public.. So I can not even resolve host.localdomain.tld if your going to ask some doh server on the public internet - even if I point to local dns.
The encryption or being slower not all that big of concern - but they deciding that they should bypass what I as the system owner and network operator set for my clients to use is the big issue here.
If you encrypt what is being asked - I can not even tell what is even being asked... Even from my own machine.
If they want to enable the possibility of using doh, that is fine - the concern is doing it without my explicit consent to do so... Maybe I don't want app xyz to be able to resolve something.. Yet again taking control away from the operator if you bypass what I say to use for dns, or use something else for any sort of lookups..
-
The MS article posted (from last spring) said it would only apply if certain DNS servers were configured. Doesn’t sound like that’s the case per the OP.
Down sides: 1) bypass any restrictions (malware detection, adult sites, betting, sports, whatever employees shouldn’t do on company time), 2) hopefully won’t bypass company network DNS (Windows domain, split DNS), 3) entities providing it get data from what web sites are visited (like Google DNS), and 4) no local DNS caching.
-
@johnpoz
It seems then that there would be plenty of web security gateway providers who would be against this, as well as all of corporate world. -
Yeah I don't see how MS corp customers would be happy about this at all..
-
At any rate, I read Unbound 1.12.0 now supports DoH.
So if someone gets bored this weekend... -
What is the point of running doh locally - really?? Other than as a way to satisfy something that wants to use doh. So if I use a local doh, it wont use a public one. This seems more like a way to try and get people to thinking that dns needs to be encrypted.
Doh nor Dot actually does what they say it does anyway - it doesn't hide where you go from the bad old isps being able to spy.. It just changes how they have to go about it. They still see what IP you are going to, until everything and everywhere supports encrypted sni.. They can see where your going in the https handshake..
In what scenario is a local network hostile to the point that would make any sense to encrypt your local dns, and slow it down as well.
What is the extra resources in cpu cycles to have say 100 clients resolve stuff over normal dns, vs 100 clients all doing encryption and the extra cpu cycles the nameserver has to expend to support.
I just really can not think of a use case for running a local doh server..
-
@provels said in MS activated DoH at the operating system level, in this "great" 20H2 release...?!:
this weekend...
Because this weekend all the root-, tld-, domain- and name servers will support it also ?
Would be nice.
My domain name servers (bind) are ready to go.Would be the end of forwarding. Great. Yet another ancient 'setup' that can be buried. DNS would become so complex that know-body touches the default (pSense) settings any more. No more DNS questions : it just plain works out of the box (actually, DNS works out of the box RIGHT NOW but then the admin logged in and well ... checkout this forum to see what happened).
Nicely resolving over 853. Everything hidden (TLS). Everything authenticated (DNSSEC).
What the heck : even certs can be checked using DNS (DNSSEC).I get the bubbles ready.
Where are the two nuclear power plants for compensating the extra power consumption ?
-
@johnpoz said in MS activated DoH at the operating system level, in this "great" 20H2 release...?!:
BTW - give me a link to download it from, I will fire it up as a VM.
I am already working on a longer observation test environment and will be monitoring this machine (20H2 fresh) continuously...but I also have to do my concrete job...
so our ISP is not spying on us :), it is an enterprise network with 3 pcs. 10 Gig optical lines running and serving our radio stations centrally, we have an individual contract with the ISP, who is otherwise the national BIX
soon I will send the link in PM...THX
(pls note that, this is a Hungarian "image" by default)as I would like to note, this machine (20H2) works alongside another 57 windowsmachines and it is only on this that we experience this issue
(I did not install it in my room at home..:)+++edit:
@johnpoz - Thanks for the positive attitude, maybe it turns out what the hell is going on... -
Can the interface be set to english - I'm going to have a difficult time if the interface is in Hungarian ;) hehehe
I can prob muddle through - not like the icons change, that sort of thing.. But searching for stuff that is not english might be a bit painful like control panel etc..
When it comes to the nonsense that is doh, its hard to have a positive attitude to be honest.. I don't care if they want to offer it.. But turning it on by default in browsers is HORRIBLE.. If they attempt to do the same thing in the OS.. Its the just the end to be honest.. It is the wrong direction to be going.. Forcing the use of central dns is NOT the correct direction for privacy or security.
-
@johnpoz said in MS activated DoH at the operating system level, in this "great" 20H2 release...?!:
Can the interface be set to english - I'm going to have a difficult time if the interface is in Hungarian ;) hehehe
I think yes :), although I haven't tried...
the installer offers the language selection option in the beginingsince I want to be faithful to the environment, I didn't download the english image
but if you can't choose a language, let me know and I'll give you an English version
I hope it also produces these stupid things in the same way...
and it wasn't just for the Hungarians who intended this stupid DoH stuff, the stupid situation in the country is enough for us... hahaha
(I don't live there but I care what's going on)@johnpoz "If they attempt to do the same thing in the OS.. "
it really is not possible to take a positive approach to this... yes
this would take control out of the hands of the sysadmins and a lot of other shit -
I see the latest pfBlockerNG-devel includes several feeds to block DoH servers.
-
@provels said in MS activated DoH at the operating system level, in this "great" 20H2 release...?!:
I see the latest pfBlockerNG-devel includes several feeds to block DoH servers.
Yes, :) as I wrote above we have been using it for thousands of years..
but this is a special problem now, look at the Wireshark PRTSC (above) and / or the o.ss2.us domain to be blocked by pfBlockerNG -devel, but on this build it doesn't... (20H2 clean from MS VLSC account, especially for Hungarians... it's a joke only :))
I personaly hate the DoH, (what the fu.....k is this, because it is not privacy protection, -that's for sure)
I think the right one: DHCP for client(s) with pfSense DNS (ONLY) + Unbound + CloudFlare DNS DoT + DNSSEC and of course pfBlockerNG -devel
-
Thanks for the link - sure wont get to today.. Nor tmrw - but saturday might have some time.
Nice link - peaked out at just over 50MBps.. Not too shabby..
-
@johnpoz said in MS activated DoH at the operating system level, in this "great" 20H2 release...?!:
Nice link - peaked out at just over 50MBps.. Not too shabby..
I think that, Dropbox EU cloud storage server + Transatlantic optic cables, and the Google is now investing in an even larger capacity cable.
Life is spinning up between the continents.I would add to the test, (these are not influencing factors, but I describe them):
The install was pure 20H2 UEFI + GPT on 120GB SSD with Rufus.
After that I just did that:-with MiniTool Partition Wizard 80 + 40 GB,
- after, I transferred the connecttest in the registry to our own server. (IPv4 only + but we don't use IPv6 anywhere, not even in pfSense - so I didn't touch it)
-Firefox installation and then I turned off DoH in Firefox (forced mode)
about:config
network.trr.mode 5-Then the network icon indicated no internet, hmmm :), even though I pointed to our own server...
-I looked for the issue and watched for the traffic to our connecttest server, I watched for 1 hour, there was no traffic, Win10 didn't even try to connect.I read somewhere that, when there is no "connecttest" connection the Win tries to browser based to decide, whether have an internet connection or not..
It does this through its own browsers.....
-So I "fired up" the Chromium based Edge stuff (which is already mandatory in this build) and let’s see the miracle, after 2 - 3 minutes there was internet according to the icon
By then, I had already seen the connection to this server (original MS connecttest) what we discussed above in Wireshark PRTSC, which would not have been possible, because pfBlockerNG is blocking this domain...
I selected another blocked domain from one of the DNSBL feeds and tried it, this domain has also been bypassed the pfBlockerNG (o.ss2.us)
Briefly about the test so much, I will continue the test over the weekend and thanks for taking the time to do it yourself too. :)
BTW:
It is important to note that, there was never any traffic to our own connecttest server which was configured in the registry...
then now, which thing sets the Win parameters, if not the registry(?), ergo this is something hidden from us..(?!)
The network icon has been merrily showing internet access ever since :), and still no connection to our own server...suspicious:
-Oddly enough, Firefox and Chromium Edge also bypass pfBlockerNGContrary to promises, Chromium Edge (which is already built into this build - not downloaded version) does not include a DoH enable or disable parameter (specific option to Chromium-based browsers).
I couldn't find it anywhere!!!it should appear somewhere in a similar way, but nowhere....
-
@provels said in MS activated DoH at the operating system level, in this "great" 20H2 release...?!:
At any rate, I read Unbound 1.12.0 now supports DoH.
We are on a mailing list here (Unbound), we are already ahead of this .....actually 1.13.0rc2 pre-release...
unlike us others love DoH, it’s crazyjust watch: