LACP not working

stephenw10

I don't think you have an STP problem since I would expect to see that logged very clearly.

If you are getting support from us it will be highly beneficial if I can add notes to any ticket you have open.

Steve

cyberbot

I don't think you have an STP problem since I would expect to see that logged very clearly.

If you are getting support from us it will be highly beneficial if I can add notes to any ticket you have open.

Steve

Hi Steve than you, we are having a local support as we are from Europe.
that company is having engineer available to investigate with us.
are you guys active in Europe?

I don't think its a spanning tree either I've disabled the MAC-learning on the lag but still shows this.

Dec  1 01:58:16:I:System: dynamic lag interface 2/1/2's peer info (priority=5,id=d067.e5e6.fe1a,key=0) mis-matches with lag's peer info (priority=32768,id=d067.e5e6.fe1a,key=363), set to mismatch Error
Dec  1 01:58:16:I:System: dynamic lag interface 1/1/2's peer info (priority=6,id=d067.e5e6.fe1a,key=0) mis-matches with lag's peer info (priority=32768,id=d067.e5e6.fe1a,key=363), set to mismatch Error
Dec  1 01:58:16:I:System: Logical link on dynamic lag interface ethernet 2/1/2 is down.

stephenw10

Ok. You can purchase support from us but not on-site.

It's showing the peer as having a different ID/MAC address now. Did you swap the ports in use in pfSense? Different priorities there also, 5&6 vs 3&4 previously. Something has changed there.

Also there is no-where in Europe it's 2am yet, what timezone is that switch set to?

Steve

cyberbot

@stephenw10 said in LACP not working:

Ok. You can purchase support from us but not on-site.

It's showing the peer as having a different ID/MAC address now. Did you swap the ports in use in pfSense? Different priorities there also, 5&6 vs 3&4 previously. Something has changed there.

Also there is no-where in Europe it's 2am yet, what timezone is that switch set to?

Steve

the switch is in Europe +1. do you think the time is the cause?
we are based in Germany. do you think different on the time would cause this?

I see it one day ahead than the normal time. 1 Dec
there is nothing changed on the switch or cables are still the same as before.

Wednesday they arranged a engineer who will come on site to check and assist. if he cannot help I can reach out for you guys, but time different is going to be difficult.

stephenw10

I doubt the clock offset would cause a problem for lagg. It does show the switch is either not configured for ntp though or unable to reach it. Or just set the wrong timezone, and not UTC.

Previously the switch logs were showing this:

lag's peer info (priority=32768,id=e839.3511.faab,key=715)

That's the expected ID, it matches the MAC address of lagg0 in pfSense.
So what is this new ID? Is that a MAC you recognise?

It throws doubt on what is physically connected to what.

Steve

cyberbot

@stephenw10 said in LACP not working:

I doubt the clock offset would cause a problem for lagg. It does show the switch is either not configured for ntp though or unable to reach it. Or just set the wrong timezone, and not UTC.

Previously the switch logs were showing this:

lag's peer info (priority=32768,id=e839.3511.faab,key=715)

That's the expected ID, it matches the MAC address of lagg0 in pfSense.
So what is this new ID? Is that a MAC you recognise?

It throws doubt on what is physically connected to what.

Steve

this possibly because I connected last time two different cables. to test.
have port em2 em 3 connected to port 8 on each switch and ebc1 and etc 2 on port 2 on each switch.
maybe that why? the currenty lag is running on the port 2 on each switch. I can disable that lacp and try port 8 lacp.
I have tried on a different port group 8 on each switch and this error shows up.
so appear I have to configure priority on the lag, but don't know where and how. never seen it before.

Nov 30 23:43:40:I:System: dynamic lag interface 1/1/8's peer info (priority=3,id=e839.3511.faab,key=0) mis-matches with lag's peer info (priority=32768,id=e839.3511.faab,key=363), set to mismatch Error

stephenw10

Seems more like you have to omit the priority in the switch/port to have it match what looks like the default value pfSense is sending. But it's not something I've had to do before.

Steve

stephenw10

In fact there is no way to set a priority in pfSense:

https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?lagg(4)#BUGS

     There is no way to	configure LACP administrative variables, including
     system and	port priorities.  The current implementation always performs
     active-mode LACP and uses 0x8000 as system	and port priorities.

So that must be in the switch config somewhere. It looks like it's set to 0 in the output you have posted but there must be somewhere else it's pulling in that value.

Steve

cyberbot

@stephenw10 said in LACP not working:

In fact there is no way to set a priority in pfSense:

https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?lagg(4)#BUGS
     There is no way to	configure LACP administrative variables, including
     system and	port priorities.  The current implementation always performs
     active-mode LACP and uses 0x8000 as system	and port priorities.
So that must be in the switch config somewhere. It looks like it's set to 0 in the output you have posted but there must be somewhere else it's pulling in that value.

Steve

Hi Steve,
today we had a call with pfsense engineer, however the issue appear the switch still.

the pfsense is sending LACP and binding the ports nicely.
but the switch is still blocking the ports and we cannot see any log neither on the switch or the firewall.
the issue still remains unresolved unfortunately.

stephenw10

Yes, it looks like a switch issue to me too.

Have you been able to test a lagg to a single switch?

Check the full switch config from both switches. It must be pulling in the port priority from somewhere.

Steve

cyberbot

@stephenw10 said in LACP not working:

Yes, it looks like a switch issue to me too.

Have you been able to test a lagg to a single switch?

Check the full switch config from both switches. It must be pulling in the port priority from somewhere.

Steve

Hi Steve,
the priority we were able to fix it, with specifying the priority and the error of the flapping were gone, but the switch was still blocking the interfaces LAG

stephenw10

No longer logging the mismatch in the switch?

cyberbot

@stephenw10 said in LACP not working:

No longer logging the mismatch in the switch?

no, not on the switch and no flapping on the firewall,
but when we do show lag it still shows blocked LAG.

stephenw10

Can we see the current output from both sides?

cyberbot

@stephenw10

yes of course only there is no log now, nothing happening at all.

cyberbot

when I do show log on the switch nothing really happens about the LACP or errors neither on the pfsense

stephenw10

Ok but can we see ifconfig -vvv lagg0 from pfSense and show lag from the switch. The complete output from each.

Steve

cyberbot

@stephenw10 said in LACP not working:

Ok but can we see ifconfig -vvv lagg0 from pfSense and show lag from the switch. The complete output from each.

Steve

Hi Steve,
see below, the engineer still confirm the switch is the cause.

lagg0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
        options=800008<VLAN_MTU>
        ether e8:39:35:11:fa:ab
        inet6 fe80::ea39:35ff:fe11:faab%lagg0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xb
        inet 192.168.73.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.73.255
        laggproto lacp lagghash l2,l3,l4
        lagg options:
                flags=90<LACP_STRICT>
                flowid_shift: 16
        lagg statistics:
                active ports: 2
                flapping: 64
        lag id: [(8000,E8-39-35-11-FA-AB,016B,0000,0000),
                 (0001,60-9C-9F-4B-80-8C,4E21,0000,0000)]
        laggport: em2 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING> state=3f<ACTIVITY,TIMEOUT,AGGREGATION,SYNC,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
                [(8000,E8-39-35-11-FA-AB,016B,8000,0003),
                 (0001,60-9C-9F-4B-80-8C,4E21,0001,0002)]
        laggport: em3 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING> state=3f<ACTIVITY,TIMEOUT,AGGREGATION,SYNC,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
                [(8000,E8-39-35-11-FA-AB,016B,8000,0004),
                 (0001,60-9C-9F-4B-80-8C,4E21,0001,0102)]
        groups: lagg
        media: Ethernet autoselect
        status: active
        nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>

=== LAG "LAN" ID 1 (dynamic Deployed) ===
LAG Configuration:
   Ports:         e 1/1/2 e 2/1/2
   Port Count:    2
   Primary Port:  1/1/2
   Trunk Type:    hash-based
   LACP Key:      20001
Deployment: HW Trunk ID 1
Port       Link    State   Dupl Speed Trunk Tag Pvid Pri MAC             Name
1/1/2      Up      Blocked Full 1G    1     Yes N/A  0   609c.9f4b.105d  LAN1
2/1/2      Up      Blocked Full 1G    1     Yes N/A  0   609c.9f4b.105d LAN2

Port       [Sys P] [Port P] [ Key ] [Act][Tio][Agg][Syn][Col][Dis][Def][Exp][Ope]
1/1/2           1        1   20001   Yes   S   Agg  Syn  Col  Dis  Def  No   Err
2/1/2           1        1   20001   Yes   S   Agg  Syn  Col  Dis  Def  No   Err

stephenw10

The timeouts are back to short on the switch but do also look like they're set short in pfSense.

There are two additional sections in the 'show lag' output. The system lag info at the top and the partner info at the bottom. Both of which might be useful here.
For example:

SSH@ICX6450-24P Switch>show lag
Total number of LAGs:          1
Total number of deployed LAGs: 1
Total number of trunks created:1 (123 available)
LACP System Priority / ID:     1 / 609c.9f54.14f2
LACP Long timeout:             90, default: 90
LACP Short timeout:            3, default: 3

=== LAG "lacp1" ID 2047 (dynamic Deployed) ===
LAG Configuration:
   Ports:         e 1/2/1 e 1/2/3 
   Port Count:    2
   Primary Port:  1/2/1
   Trunk Type:    hash-based
   LACP Key:      22047
   LACP Timeout:  long
Deployment: HW Trunk ID 1
Port       Link    State   Dupl Speed Trunk Tag Pvid Pri MAC             Name
1/2/1      Up      Forward Full 10G   2047  No  1    0   609c.9f54.150b                 
1/2/3      Up      Forward Full 10G   2047  No  1    0   609c.9f54.150b                 

Port       [Sys P] [Port P] [ Key ] [Act][Tio][Agg][Syn][Col][Dis][Def][Exp][Ope]
1/2/1           1        1   22047   Yes   L   Agg  Syn  Col  Dis  No   No   Ope
1/2/3           1        1   22047   Yes   L   Agg  Syn  Col  Dis  No   No   Ope
                                                                  

 Partner Info and PDU Statistics 
Port          Partner         Partner     LACP      LACP     
             System ID         Key     Rx Count  Tx Count  
1/2/1    32768-00e0.ed86.a68c      690     5638     13113
1/2/3    32768-00e0.ed86.a68c      690     5625     13138

[2.4.5-RELEASE][admin@7100.stevew.lan]/root: ifconfig -vvv lagg0
lagg0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=500b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER,VLAN_HWTSO>
	ether 00:e0:ed:86:a6:8c
	inet6 fe80::2e0:edff:fe86:a68c%lagg0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x15
	inet 172.21.16.206 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.21.16.255
	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
	media: Ethernet autoselect
	status: active
	groups: lagg
	laggproto lacp lagghash l2,l3,l4
	lagg options:
		flags=10<LACP_STRICT>
		flowid_shift: 16
	lagg statistics:
		active ports: 2
		flapping: 0
	lag id: [(8000,00-E0-ED-86-A6-8C,02B2,0000,0000),
		 (0001,60-9C-9F-54-14-F2,561F,0000,0000)]
	laggport: ixl0 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING> state=3d<ACTIVITY,AGGREGATION,SYNC,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
		[(8000,00-E0-ED-86-A6-8C,02B2,8000,0001),
		 (0001,60-9C-9F-54-14-F2,561F,0001,0041)]
	laggport: ixl1 flags=1c<ACTIVE,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING> state=3d<ACTIVITY,AGGREGATION,SYNC,COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
		[(8000,00-E0-ED-86-A6-8C,02B2,8000,0002),
		 (0001,60-9C-9F-54-14-F2,561F,0001,0043)]

cyberbot

Hi Steve,

do you suggest to reconfigure the set up to long instead of short?
i can do that is not a issue at all, but the switch still blocking it