Download at full speed then got packet loss
-
For my opinion you've bought the wrong device to run pfSense. That ZBOX is ~250 bucks as barebone with 2 Realtek NICs...makes my heart bleeding.
300/50(40) Mbps looks like Telekom Germany, refund that box if possible (14 day window) and get some serious pfSense gear.-Rico
-
@stephenw10
I ping on www.google.de.
It doesn't matter what I ping. -
Yes it is a telecom line.
It is really difficult to get good hardware for the PFsense in Germany that is energy efficient.What kind of hardware would you suggest?
-
Mmm, the Celeron N4100 is not that fast. It's possible you're hitting something there though you are seeing the full bandwidth. I would expect it to pass 300Mbops without issues though. Maybe it's stuck at the lowest speed.
Try running at the CLI
top -aSH
whilst testing. See if one core at loaded 100%.Steve
-
-
Nope. All 4 cores are at least 73% idle. That's only 224Mbps though.
I'm still not sure you're actually limiting that traffic though.
What does the speed test result show when you disable the Limiters? vs with the Limiters?
Steve
-
-
Hmm, well that looks OK. Maybe more than FQ_Codel can deal with then.
I don't actually see any packet loss there though, are you still seeing that?
-
There are always packet losses at full speed downloads. Worse is that the ping rises from 5ms to 50. Then you get problems with Voip
-
Mmm, the latency is unavoidable to a certain extent though I would not expect packet loss.
You can try setting a lower limit for all other traffic and passing VoIP traffic outside the Limiters to reserve bandwidth for it.
Steve
-
@stephenw10 said in Download at full speed then got packet loss:
Celeron N4100
More for my own education than anything, why is the general theme that the HW pfSense is running on is the problem and not the ISP with what looks to be a full link?
While Realtek NICs are not the best, the speed is only 25% of what the NIC should be able to do, so it is not stressed. I would not expect a unstressed NIC causing a problem.
I run on an i3 540 with 4 port Intel 1Gb NIC and even with a speed test running @ 980Mbps and file copies crossing the other NICs I see no change in pings and a CPU getting close to 30%. The CPU in the problem system is generations newer and should be faster per cycle than mine.
-
@andyrh
Unfortunately I can not say what the problem is. I only know that if there is no full load traffic on the line, there is no packet loss. I also think that my hardware should be sufficient. -
@andyrh said in Download at full speed then got packet loss:
why is the general theme that the HW pfSense is running on is the problem and not the ISP with what looks to be a full link?
It isn't, not here at least. As I said there I would expect that CPU to pass 300Mbps with ease and the output from top showed that to be true.
I would always expect to see some increase in latency when you use more WAN bandwidth but not packet loss as we're seeing here.
I would not expect to see either when loading the CPU with traffic between other interfaces. Unless you are maxing at least one core completely.Steve