Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    How to separate 3 LANs on a quad-port NIC so they have no access to the other networks?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    14 Posts 4 Posters 1.2k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F Offline
      FireQ @johnpoz
      last edited by

      @johnpoz I thought that would provide an extra layer to keep the networks separate and I don't care too much about the bandwidth on the IOT and Guest networks. Would it be better to just disable DHCP on all downstream routers?

      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ Online
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @FireQ
        last edited by johnpoz

        Yeah it gives you more insight and control into what is on your network, and what they are doing.

        Why would you hide stuff behind another nat on your own network?

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 25.07 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07

        F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F Offline
          FireQ @johnpoz
          last edited by

          @johnpoz I don't want guests or the IOT devices with weak security to be able to access my main LAN or the firewall.

          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ? Offline
            A Former User
            last edited by A Former User

            Just create block rules on the network you want to isolate.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ Online
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @FireQ
              last edited by johnpoz

              @fireq

              What does that have to do with downstream nat.. Unless you have the rules inplace on your firewall to stop access they would still be able to access your lan.. Unless you were using the same network as what is behind your routers?

              Not sure what good removing your insight and control of stuff on your network - if the goal is blocking access.. Which is as simple 1 firewall rule..

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 25.07 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07

              F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V Offline
                viragomann @FireQ
                last edited by

                @fireq
                It may be more reliable to use the preset "this firewall" alias for blocking access to pfSense itselft then creating your own alias.

                F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • F Offline
                  FireQ @johnpoz
                  last edited by

                  @johnpoz thanks john. am still learning so obviously making mistakes but the feedback is helpful

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • F Offline
                    FireQ @viragomann
                    last edited by

                    @viragomann thanks, I tried that first but still had access to the gui so changed to the specific IP.

                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ Online
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @FireQ
                      last edited by

                      @fireq said in How to separate 3 LANs on a quad-port NIC so they have no access to the other networks?:

                      I tried that first but still had access to the gui

                      Keep in mind that just because you create a block rule doesn't mean there isn't an existing state that is allowing the traffic.

                      When you go to block something - you need to make sure there is no existing state that is allowing.

                      The "this firewall" is the best way to block access to the firewall for vlans you don't want to be able to access stuff on the firewall you don't want.. because it also includes the wan IP which is quite often public. So would not be included in any rfc1918 alias you use..

                      Here is a example set of rules for a locked down vlan..

                      rules.png

                      Can be modified for your wants/needs. It allows this vlan to ping pfsense IP on that vlan - for connectivity testing. It allows access to dns and ntp.. But then all other access to any other vlan or any firewall IP is rejected. Rejected can help with letting the client know - you ain't getting there... So no need to keep trying via retrans, etc. This can be helpful on local networks - would never do on wan.

                      Then it allows everything else, ie the internet.

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 25.07 | Lab VMs 2.8, 25.07

                      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • F Offline
                        FireQ @johnpoz
                        last edited by

                        @johnpoz great! thanks for the explanation. will use that example and modify for my setup.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.