Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Need help with my VLAN firewall rules to make sure they do what I think they do

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    69 Posts 5 Posters 4.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • bingo600B
      bingo600 @A Former User
      last edited by

      @jwj

      They are resolving the supported OS'es (during instal/update) via a DNS TXT record.

      If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

      pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

      QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
      CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
      LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User @bingo600
        last edited by A Former User

        @bingo600 OK, ummmm. I guess... I can think of other ways to do that... Are they doing two things at once. That the box can resolv some domain and getting the list of supported OS's in one go. Why...

        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @A Former User
          last edited by

          Looking into a bit deeper something about MS dns not supporting cookie options.. But looks to me like the suggested work around was to just set +nocookie in the dig command.

          No matter what lame reasoning they came up with - doing a directed query like that is not the way to do it if you ask me.

          You could offer it up as a solution if the normal query failed, etc. But doing it in the background not a fan of.. Other option was to hard code the supported OS versions.. which would of been better options I think as well.

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          ? bingo600B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            A Former User @johnpoz
            last edited by

            @johnpoz Just go after some list they host somewhere on pi-hole.net.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • bingo600B
              bingo600 @johnpoz
              last edited by

              @johnpoz
              Did you find the git PR that shows the cookie issue ?
              I had a brief look , but didn't find any.

              /Bingo

              If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

              pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

              QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
              CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
              LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • bingo600B
                bingo600
                last edited by bingo600

                Ahh think it's this one

                (Win SRV 2008R2) , that is even out of support ... Grrrrr
                https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/issues/3578

                That leads to this one
                https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/issues/3595

                That even contains

                Try with dig +nocookie -t txt versions.pi-hole.net
                

                Sigh .... Redmond again šŸ¤’

                If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

                pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @bingo600
                  last edited by

                  Yeah and it was with 2008r2 that is DEAD... full end of life was jan 2020, so why would they be doing something to work around an issue with that in july of 2020?

                  All seems a bit stupid to me..

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  I bingo600B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • I
                    imthenachoman @johnpoz
                    last edited by

                    @johnpoz @bingo600 A lot of what y'all are saying is going way over my head. I am trying to decode/translate for myself. It sounds like y'all are talking about something specific to pi hole -- is that right? Just so I can better understand the conversation...

                    bingo600B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • bingo600B
                      bingo600 @imthenachoman
                      last edited by

                      @imthenachoman
                      Yes .. We're talking about pi-hole , and DNS blocking.
                      And that pi-hole won't update if you block DNS to anything but the pfSense.

                      If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

                      pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                      QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                      CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                      LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                      I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • I
                        imthenachoman @bingo600
                        last edited by

                        @bingo600 I see. Interesting. Thanks!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • bingo600B
                          bingo600 @johnpoz
                          last edited by bingo600

                          @johnpoz

                          I just got a new update for my pihole, i suppose you ought to see it too

                          This time i tried

                          PIHOLE_SKIP_OS_CHECK=true sudo -E pihole -r
                          

                          Selected repair , and the update went through wo. opening for ns1

                          But damm annoying 😠 šŸ‘Ž

                          If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

                          pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                          QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                          CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                          LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • johnpozJ
                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @bingo600
                            last edited by johnpoz

                            Looks like an update to FTL.. lets see what happens.. I have these rules in place..

                            blockdns.png

                            For the vlan that my pihole sits on..

                            Yeah this is nonsense...

                             [āœ—] Retrieval of supported OS list failed. dig failed with return code 9. 
                                  Unable to determine if the detected OS (Raspbian 10) is supported
                                  Possible causes for this include:
                                    - Firewall blocking certain DNS lookups from Pi-hole device
                                    - ns1.pi-hole.net being blocked (required to obtain TXT record from versions.pi-hole.net containing supported operating systems)
                                    - Other internet connectivity issues
                            

                            This is zero issue with grabbing that info.. Other that you forcing a direct query to ns1.. Gawd this just pisses me off that they do nonsense like this.. Arrrghh.. Why are people so freaking stupid?????

                            root@pi-hole:/home/pi# dig versions.pi-hole.net txt
                            
                            ; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u2-Raspbian <<>> versions.pi-hole.net txt
                            ;; global options: +cmd
                            ;; Got answer:
                            ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 16772
                            ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
                            
                            ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
                            ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
                            ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                            ;versions.pi-hole.net.          IN      TXT
                            
                            ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                            versions.pi-hole.net.   3600    IN      TXT     "Raspbian=9,10 Ubuntu=16,18,20 Debian=9,10 Fedora=31,32 CentOS=7,8"
                            
                            ;; Query time: 356 msec
                            ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
                            ;; WHEN: Sat Dec 26 19:21:24 CST 2020
                            ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 127
                            
                            root@pi-hole:/home/pi# 
                            

                            So they fixed working with some antiquated dns windows server 2008??? That is EOL!!! By just bypassing it. To break everyone else that would be filtering dns other than their own.. Ie pretty much every pihole user on the planet ;) This is just some of the stupidest shit ever.. WTF!!!

                            While I am a fan of pihole - this is just borked.. Same goes with some of the nonsense they are trying to do with dnssec.. If your going to forward, dnssec is pointless - he doesn't get that either.. Maybe we should fork their code ;)

                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                            bingo600B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • bingo600B
                              bingo600 @johnpoz
                              last edited by

                              @johnpoz said in Need help with my VLAN firewall rules to make sure they do what I think they do:

                              While I am a fan of pihole - this is just borked..

                              Totally agree .. Fix for an old outdated OS , and "bork" everyone else.

                              Same goes with some of the nonsense they are trying to do with dnssec.. If your going to forward, dnssec is pointless - he doesn't get that either..

                              I thought they wouldn't touch DoH at all as "PH is not a security product"

                              Maybe we should fork their code ;)

                              He..He
                              Intriquing , but i doubt i have time for that.

                              /Bingo

                              If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

                              pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                              QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                              CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                              LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.