Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    offloading OpenVPN using external gateway

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    70 Posts 2 Posters 12.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      chrispazz @bingo600
      last edited by

      @bingo600 latest try was with google IP as you asked....am I wrong?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • bingo600B
        bingo600 @chrispazz
        last edited by

        @chrispazz said in offloading OpenVPN using external gateway:

        @bingo600 said in offloading OpenVPN using external gateway:

        What does as host mean (you mean you ping the raspi) ?

        HOST is the captured Host address

        We need to see the mac addresses in those packets.

        b8:27:eb:8e:00:43 is Raspi MAC Address
        02:11:32:25:4e:f9 is pfsense WAN interface

        Full detailed trace is the following:

        192.168.5.1 > 192.168.5.99: ICMP echo request, id 43267, seq 28884, length 9
        19:51:42.213831 b8:27:eb:8e:00:43 > 02:11:32:25:4e:f9, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 59852, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 29)
        192.168.5.99 > 192.168.5.1: ICMP echo reply, id 43267, seq 28884, length 9
        19:51:42.723672 02:11:32:25:4e:f9 > b8:27:eb:8e:00:43, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 43: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 65165, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 29)

        What command did you use on the iMAC to make this trace , where it goes to the Raspi (but raspi as destination)

        If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

        pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

        QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
        CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
        LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

        C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          chrispazz @bingo600
          last edited by

          @bingo600 only "ping www.google.it".

          But in first trace I used the raspi as Host capture.

          C bingo600B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            chrispazz @chrispazz
            last edited by chrispazz

            Ok this is interesting:

            I added a floating rule with no filters but "out" direction and in advanced settings with the Raspi Gateway.

            With this, the connection go correctly thru the Raspi VPN.

            So, the external gateway thur pfsense is working correctly.
            I have to understand why when using a firewall rule in a specific interface is not using Raspi gateway

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • bingo600B
              bingo600 @chrispazz
              last edited by bingo600

              @chrispazz
              I don't think the first capture is showing the : ping www.google.it
              I think something is pinging the Raspi ... And it's prob the gw-monitor.
              I was fooled there

              It was my mistake concluding the policy route was working, in the first trace we saw.

              A working policy route package would be like the last one you made (google ip)
              but with the RasPI MAC instead of the ISP-Router MAC

              So at the moment pfSense policy routing is NOT working as intended

              If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

              pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

              QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
              CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
              LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

              C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                chrispazz @bingo600
                last edited by chrispazz

                @bingo600 Yes but the rules is matched because it is logged in the pfsense firewall log.
                It only is ignoring the gateway in advanced settings....
                The same rule in "floating" mode is working...

                C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  chrispazz @chrispazz
                  last edited by

                  This is really strange, now again the floating rule is not working.
                  I will try to reboot pfsense....

                  bingo600B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • bingo600B
                    bingo600 @chrispazz
                    last edited by

                    @chrispazz said in offloading OpenVPN using external gateway:

                    This is really strange, now again the floating rule is not working.
                    I will try to reboot pfsense....

                    Noooooo
                    Don't say you're using floating rules , i asked about that

                    If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

                    pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                    QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                    CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                    LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                    C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      chrispazz @bingo600
                      last edited by

                      @bingo600
                      I was NOT using floating rules at all.

                      I tried now to see the same rule in floating mode if it works with raspi gateway or not and with floating IT IS working.....

                      Why in floating mode use the specified gateway and in normal not floating mode ignores it?

                      C bingo600B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        chrispazz @chrispazz
                        last edited by chrispazz

                        This post is deleted!
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • bingo600B
                          bingo600 @chrispazz
                          last edited by

                          @chrispazz

                          It shouldn't
                          But AFAIK floating rules are always parsed first.

                          If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

                          pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                          QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                          CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                          LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            chrispazz @bingo600
                            last edited by

                            @bingo600 Should I open a bug in pfsense? 😧

                            bingo600B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • bingo600B
                              bingo600 @chrispazz
                              last edited by

                              @chrispazz
                              Not yet

                              I think one of the mods / gurus should review this thread first.

                              @stephenw10 @johnpoz
                              Any words here

                              If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

                              pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                              QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                              CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                              LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • bingo600B
                                bingo600
                                last edited by

                                I don't hope we have been bitten by NAT 😰
                                The policy rule rule was on a LAN ingress interface , looking at the HOST Source IP of the iMAC. And the Logging showed a match.

                                Technically the source IP is later being set to the pfSense WAN IP, but the new gateway ought to have been set before that.

                                I'm officialy confused šŸ¤•

                                I do hope your policy rule was the top most rule , and that you didn't have any rules before that on that interface , else we'we been chasing ghosts all night.

                                A permit ICMP any any before the policy rule would have made that "ghost"

                                /Bingo

                                If you find my answer useful - Please give the post a šŸ‘ - "thumbs up"

                                pfSense+ 23.05.1 (ZFS)

                                QOTOM-Q355G4 Quad Lan.
                                CPUĀ  : Core i5 5250U, Ram : 8GB Kingston DDR3LV 1600
                                LANĀ  : 4 x Intel 211, DiskĀ  : 240G SAMSUNG MZ7L3240HCHQ SSD

                                C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C
                                  chrispazz @bingo600
                                  last edited by

                                  @bingo600 eheheh

                                  Yes, the policy rule is the first one on that interface.

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • C
                                    chrispazz @chrispazz
                                    last edited by

                                    I tried some other tests but no luck. I am officially unable to apply that gateway

                                    😧

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.